[PATCH] Check the validity of git repository.

Sir, Please check if this works. Thanks and Regards Abhinav Jain Earlier the function valid was checking the validity of the git repository, the program was working in. For doing this the function was first checking whether path exists or not and after that it was checking whether the

Re: GSOC proposal - Runtime tracing

Hi! I have uploaded my final proposal pdf for GSOC'18. I have tried to incorporate all the comments made. PFA the final draft of the proposal. Thanks for being such a wonderful community! I enjoyed every bit of the application process. Warm regards, Vidushi Vashishth ​

Re: x86_64 port and BSP (GSoC 2018)

On 26/03/2018 14:49, Amaan Cheval wrote: > Hi! > > Thanks for your comments on the document, by the way. Regarding the > following comment: > >> We should support multiboot as well for legacy X86 BIOSes. There are > headers about that can do this. > > This is a great point - this way legacy

Re: [PATCH] Check the validity of git repository.

Sir, I sent the mail using git-send-email only. I don't know why git reports it as corrupt. I will resend it. Thanks and Regards Abhinav Jain On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 4:39 AM, Chris Johns wrote: > On 23/02/2018 15:02, Abhinav Jain wrote: > > I have made the changes as per

Re: Improve coverage analysis toolset

1. Yes , I plan to work on identifying the discrepancies between what covoar reports directly and what the gcov reports based on its gcov output. 2. I understand this point that the scripting that generates symbol set file, needs to be modified accordingly 3. I have planned to make a note and

Re: x86_64 port and BSP (GSoC 2018)

Hi! Thanks for your comments on the document, by the way. Regarding the following comment: > We should support multiboot as well for legacy X86 BIOSes. There are headers about that can do this. This is a great point - this way legacy BIOSes only need something like GRUB (or a bootloader

Re: [PATCH] rsb: Add '--patchdir' option description

On 21/02/2018 01:47, Maksim E. Kozlov wrote: > According to commit d30be3129e9681a74efc80ce241aaf3c3a5b0efe in > rtems-source-builder repo. > > Signed-off-by: Maksim E. Kozlov Pushed. Thank you. Chris ___ devel mailing list

Re: [PATCH] Check the validity of git repository.

On 23/02/2018 15:02, Abhinav Jain wrote: > I have made the changes as per your suggestions. > Please review the changes and guide me, whether I have done it correcctly or > not > and also if something more is to be added to the code. > I cannot push this patch, git reports it as corrupt. Did

Re: [PATCH] cpu-supplement: Add ARM BSPs chapter

On 14/03/2018 17:20, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 13/03/18 22:58, Chris Johns wrote: >> On 09/03/2018 19:55, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>> On 06/11/17 10:03, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 26/10/17 08:22, Sebastian Huber wrote: > Please review this patch carefully. It adds a new chapter "ARM Board

Re: x86_64 port and BSP (GSoC 2018)

On 20/03/2018 18:10, Amaan Cheval wrote: > On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 11:44 AM Chris Johns wrote: >> On 20/03/2018 16:21, Amaan Cheval wrote: >>> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 8:23 AM Chris Johns wrote: On 19/03/2018 18:36, Amaan Cheval wrote: >>> (Assuming that

Re: Improve coverage analysis toolset

Just a couple of questions and planning issues. The planning issues are because the requirements for some of the work are likely not solid on our side. 1. Do you plan to work on identifying the discrepancies between what covoar reports directly and what gcov reports based on its gcov file output?

Re: Improve coverage analysis toolset

submitted ! If you find time , please give final review as well. Thanks On 26 Mar 2018 1:44 a.m., "Joel Sherrill" wrote: > I am out and not at a computer. Someone can double check me but I believe > you can replace the PDF you upload. > > Unless someone answers soon, just

Re: Improve coverage analysis toolset

I am out and not at a computer. Someone can double check me but I believe you can replace the PDF you upload. Unless someone answers soon, just upload it. --joel On Mar 25, 2018 2:37 PM, "Vijay Kumar Banerjee" wrote: > It's the last day before the deadline! > Please

Re: Improve coverage analysis toolset

It's the last day before the deadline! Please provide a final review of the proposal before submitting. Thanks -- vijay On 24 March 2018 at 21:37, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote: > hello mentors and other developers of the community , there are only three > days

24 Hours Until GSoC Application Deadline

Hi Less than 24 hours left to get your applications in as final. Remember you can replace the PDF even when marked final. Please don't let a paperwork issue keep you from being considered. Thanks. --joel ___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org