[PATCH] score: Fix per-CPU data allocation

Allocate the per-CPU data for secondary processors directly from the heap areas before heap initialization and not via _Workspace_Allocate_aligned(). This avoids dependency on the workspace allocator. It fixes also a problem on some platforms (e.g. QorIQ) where at this early point in the system i

[PATCH 2/2] gdb/python: Use python-config for the configuration if found.

From: Chris Johns - Do not assume the installed paths for the header and library. Ask python-config if found. Close #3537. --- source-builder/config/gdb-common-1.cfg | 25 + source-builder/sb/rtems-build-dep | 2 +- 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 5 deletions(

[PATCH 1/2] sb/execute: Port the rtemstoolkit performance fixes for python3

From: Chris Johns Close #3664. --- source-builder/sb/execute.py | 332 +-- 1 file changed, 278 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-) diff --git a/source-builder/sb/execute.py b/source-builder/sb/execute.py index 12d8114..0c25163 100755 --- a/source-builder/sb/execute.py

Re: need patch for old gcc docs for newer makeinfo was Re: Unable to build m68k arch on 4.9

Hello , I was also able to fetch the download now , has this change in the download link been merged ? Now i am stuck on the same problem as described by ticket #2581 *https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/2581 * Thank you for bringing this up !! --Shashvat On Mon,

RE: Zynq SMP CPU0 Not Waking CPU1

Hi, A little embarrassing but the problem has been solved. I was using SDK to load and run the image on my Zynq Board directly through SDK. Unbeknownst to me, SDK (even when using the RUN option instead of the DEBUG option) still hangs both processors and requires the user to start them up manu

Zynq SMP CPU0 Not Waking CPU1

Hi, I'm attempting to get SMP running on my Zynq board and am having an issue. It would appear that during CPU Initialization CPU0 initializes and then loops through _ARM_Data_memory_barrier waiting to receive a message from CPU1 before starting. The issue is that it would appear that it never

Re: waf and Python 3.7

On 18/12/2018 07:38, Joel Sherrill wrote: > On Mon, Dec 17, 2018, 2:21 PM Christian Mauderer wrote: > > Hello, > > I have trouble building rtems-tools (via source builder) on an > Arch-Linux machine with a Python 3.7. I searched for the problem and > f

Re: waf and Python 3.7

On Mon, Dec 17, 2018, 2:21 PM Christian Mauderer Hello, > > I have trouble building rtems-tools (via source builder) on an > Arch-Linux machine with a Python 3.7. I searched for the problem and > found out that it is due to an old waf version in the rtems-tools repo. > The bug is fixed since 9 mon

waf and Python 3.7

Hello, I have trouble building rtems-tools (via source builder) on an Arch-Linux machine with a Python 3.7. I searched for the problem and found out that it is due to an old waf version in the rtems-tools repo. The bug is fixed since 9 months and newer versions of waf don't have a problem with it

need patch for old gcc docs for newer makeinfo was Re: Unable to build m68k arch on 4.9

Bringing this back up. I have the sources fetching now but gcc requires a patch for the documentation because it was built using an old version of makeinfo that is more forgiving. I don't seem to be abl eot find these patches. I know we had them. I was just going to go through 4.9 and 4.10 to see

Re: clang-format Style for RTEMS

Hello Mikail, thanks for your summary. I tried a couple for C code formatters for RTEMS in the last couple of years and none delivered sufficiently good results. My hope was that we could use clang-format with some additions for RTEMS. However, it seems the hurdle to add new style options to

Re: PATCH: Multiprocessor support for SIS simulator

On 17/12/18 6:22 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > Hello Jiri, > > I tested your patches and checked it in: > > https://git.rtems.org/rtems-source-builder/commit/?id=96673d751ab488d5d892ae67c1842aef9d5c068b > > https://git.rtems.org/rtems-tools/commit/?id=820eba4546a21bf45d01f7742a59e5ad6da2a119 > >

[PATCH] Fix: File without suffix duplicates expm1.c

File expm1.c contains the latest licence header, source code is same. --- testsuites/psxtests/psxhdrs/math/expm1. | 38 - 1 file changed, 38 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 testsuites/psxtests/psxhdrs/math/expm1. diff --git a/testsuites/psxtests/psxhdrs/math/expm1