On 31/07/2019 07:30, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Have added the prev_state in client-side:
https://github.com/rmeena840/rtems-tools/commit/43ae797ba3c6123cc51a6244a62912c999f69a1e
The bit field is documented in the manual. I would simplify this to:
cctx->switch_out_int[ item->cpu ].prev_state =
On 30/07/2019 18:32, Ravindra Kumar Meena wrote:
> The next tasks are:
>
> 1. Detect if we switch to/from an idle thread. In this case
set the
> corresponding state to TASK_IDLE == 1026.
>
> I tried to work on this task. I am not sure how to detect it
On 31/07/2019 01:23, Gedare Bloom wrote:
Hello folks,
I'm trying to compile leon3 with clang, because I'm under the
impression it should be possible. I got as far as
mv -f base_sp/.deps/base_sp-apptask.Tpo base_sp/.deps/base_sp-apptask.Po
clang -target sparc-rtems5 -ccc-gcc-name sparc-rtems5-gcc
On 31/07/2019 07:02, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 31/07/2019 00:47, Joel Sherrill wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91303
Here's the output. Any ideas?
Yes, support for SPE was removed in GCC 8.
Oh, sorry. You are building GCC. This is a regression from last week.
--
Sebast
On 31/07/2019 00:47, Joel Sherrill wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91303
Here's the output. Any ideas?
Yes, support for SPE was removed in GCC 8.
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax
Hello folks,
I'm trying to compile leon3 with clang, because I'm under the
impression it should be possible. I got as far as
mv -f base_sp/.deps/base_sp-apptask.Tpo base_sp/.deps/base_sp-apptask.Po
clang -target sparc-rtems5 -ccc-gcc-name sparc-rtems5-gcc
-mcpu=leon3 -O2 -g -ffunction-sections -fd
I updated that page. Please have a look. You'll need to build RTEMS
out-of-tree, usually in a parallel build directory to your checked-out
rtems.git.
On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 11:20 AM Prajjwal Dangal
wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> I tried following the steps in the link
> https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/P
Hi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91303
Here's the output. Any ideas?
/home/joel/test-gcc/b-powerpc-rtems5-gcc/./gcc/xgcc
-B/home/joel/test-gcc/b-powerpc-rtems5-gcc/./gcc/ -nostdinc
-B/home/joel/test-gcc/b-powerpc-rtems5-gcc/powerpc-rtems5/newlib/
-isystem
/home/joel/test-gcc/b-po
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 12:29 PM Vaibhav Gupta
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 7:23 PM Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 7:44 AM Vaibhav Gupta
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 3:25 AM Gedare Bloom wrote:
>>>
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:43 AM Vaibh
fine with me
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 1:14 PM wrote:
>
> From: Christian Mauderer
>
> Remove static stuff that is never used.
> ---
> bsps/arm/beagle/gpio/bbb-gpio.c | 133
> 1 file changed, 133 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/bsps/arm/beagle/gpio/bbb-gpio.c b/bsps
On 30/07/2019 17:59, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 12:40 AM Christian Mauderer
> wrote:
>>
>> On 29/07/2019 22:11, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>>> We had a GSoC project about GPIO API implemented for RPi.
>>>
>>> https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/GSoC/2013/Raspberry_Pi_BSP_Peripherals
>>
>> Hel
From: Christian Mauderer
Remove static stuff that is never used.
---
bsps/arm/beagle/gpio/bbb-gpio.c | 133
1 file changed, 133 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bsps/arm/beagle/gpio/bbb-gpio.c b/bsps/arm/beagle/gpio/bbb-gpio.c
index 8532f544ab..bd081fae5a 100644
--- a/
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 9:29 PM Gedare Bloom wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 12:40 AM Christian Mauderer
> wrote:
> >
> > On 29/07/2019 22:11, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> > > We had a GSoC project about GPIO API implemented for RPi.
> > >
> > > https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/GSoC/2013/Raspberry_Pi_BSP_
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 7:23 PM Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 7:44 AM Vaibhav Gupta
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 3:25 AM Gedare Bloom wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:43 AM Vaibhav Gupta
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Hello,
>>> > Progress so far:
>>> > - ND
>
> > The next tasks are:
> >
> > 1. Detect if we switch to/from an idle thread. In this case set the
> > corresponding state to TASK_IDLE == 1026.
> >
> > I tried to work on this task. I am not sure how to detect it without
> > calling pthread_*.
> > Does this have to do something with
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 12:40 AM Christian Mauderer
wrote:
>
> On 29/07/2019 22:11, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> > We had a GSoC project about GPIO API implemented for RPi.
> >
> > https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/GSoC/2013/Raspberry_Pi_BSP_Peripherals
>
> Hello Gedare,
>
> thanks for the hint. It seems that
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 12:01 AM Sebastian Huber
wrote:
>
> On 29/07/2019 23:40, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 2:25 AM Sebastian Huber
> > wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> Joel asked me to document the normal patch review process. Should this
> >> be in a "Contributing" chapter in
On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 11:57 PM Sebastian Huber
wrote:
>
> On 30/07/2019 00:25, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> >> We have to be careful to do what makes them presentable to humans.
> >>
> > It would seem wise to make the hierarchy of requirements follow the
> > same organization as the hierarchy of the Ma
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 8:49 PM Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 10:15 AM Vaibhav Gupta
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 7:23 PM Joel Sherrill wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 7:44 AM Vaibhav Gupta
>>> wrote:
>>>
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 10:15 AM Vaibhav Gupta
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 7:23 PM Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 7:44 AM Vaibhav Gupta
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 3:25 AM Gedare Bloom wrote:
>>>
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:43 AM Vaibh
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 7:23 PM Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 7:44 AM Vaibhav Gupta
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 3:25 AM Gedare Bloom wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:43 AM Vaibhav Gupta
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Hello,
>>> > Progress so far:
>>> > - ND
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 7:44 AM Vaibhav Gupta
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 3:25 AM Gedare Bloom wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:43 AM Vaibhav Gupta
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hello,
>> > Progress so far:
>> > - NDBM patch is pushed by newlib.
>> > - NDBM Testsuite is sent to devel ([PAT
On 30/07/2019 14:40, Ravindra Kumar Meena wrote:
I checked in the RTEMS patch to add some basic support for thread
names.
Please update your RTEMS to the current master branch.
I check in some patches for the rtems-record program in your
rtems-tools
branch.
Please ru
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 3:25 AM Gedare Bloom wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:43 AM Vaibhav Gupta
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> > Progress so far:
> > - NDBM patch is pushed by newlib.
> > - NDBM Testsuite is sent to devel ([PATCH V6] ndbm test suite), its
> execution will be verified once newlib
>
> I checked in the RTEMS patch to add some basic support for thread names.
> Please update your RTEMS to the current master branch.
>
> I check in some patches for the rtems-record program in your rtems-tools
> branch.
>
> Please run your tests with new raw input data:
>
> ../../build/misc/rtems-
On 30/07/2019 00:16, Gedare Bloom wrote:
Seems to make sense to me. I noted just a few very small grammatical errors.
Thanks for the review, I fixed the errors.
I will now work on a description of the "normal patch review process".
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornierst
Hi Andrei,
Thank you for your feedback.
I think that we have document the deviations if “RTEMS” wants to be “MISRA
compliant”.
For the ESA pre-qualification project it is not required that RTEMS is “MISRA
compliant”, but may be it could be. In this case I think you are right, to be
MIRSA2012
On 29/7/19 5:07 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> Add NULL-pointer protection. Make MMU table read-only. Move vector
> table to start section.
Please push this change.
Thank you.
Chris
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/l
28 matches
Mail list logo
