On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 12:08 PM Sebastian Huber
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> since C++ and Python seems to be the preferred languages for RTEMS Tools I
> think we need also a C++ guide. I would not re-invent the wheel and just pick
> up something existing. The Google C++ Style doesn't seem to be compl
Hello Andrew,
On 27/08/2019 16:58, Andrew Butterfield wrote:
Dear RTEMS developers, qualifiers,
I am involved with the ESA funded RTEMS (SMP) qualification activity,
and I, with colleagues, will be exploring how formal verification techniques
can help.
We will not "formally prove" all of RTE
On 28/08/2019 04:40, Chris Johns wrote:
On 28/8/19 4:08 am, Sebastian Huber wrote:
since C++ and Python seems to be the preferred languages for RTEMS Tools I
think we need also a C++ guide. I would not re-invent the wheel and just pick
up something existing. The Google C++ Style doesn't seem t
On 28/08/2019 03:38, Chris Johns wrote:
On 28/8/19 4:12 am, Sebastian Huber wrote:
has someone a hint for me how I can use an addr2line functionality in a C++
program for the RTEMS tools (the stupid solution would be to use the addr2line
program via a child process)? I would like to map addres
On 28/8/19 4:08 am, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> since C++ and Python seems to be the preferred languages for RTEMS Tools I
> think we need also a C++ guide. I would not re-invent the wheel and just pick
> up something existing. The Google C++ Style doesn't seem to be completely
> stupid and it is s
On 28/8/19 4:12 am, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> has someone a hint for me how I can use an addr2line functionality in a C++
> program for the RTEMS tools (the stupid solution would be to use the
> addr2line program via a child process)? I would like to map addresses from
> trace data to a source/li
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 1:42 AM Christian Mauderer
wrote:
> On 27/08/2019 21:43, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have sent a patch that fixes this issue:
> > https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2019-August/027540.html
> >
> > Please try it with this patch.
> >
> > Christian:
On 27/08/2019 21:43, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have sent a patch that fixes this issue:
> https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2019-August/027540.html
>
> Please try it with this patch.
>
> Christian: I have tested it with the sample app on BBB, can you please
> review it? :)
Hello,
I have sent a patch that fixes this issue:
https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2019-August/027540.html
Please try it with this patch.
Christian: I have tested it with the sample app on BBB, can you please
review it? :)
Best regards
>
___
d
---
rtemsbsd/include/bsp/nexus-devices.h | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/rtemsbsd/include/bsp/nexus-devices.h
b/rtemsbsd/include/bsp/nexus-devices.h
index e9da3be1..ac9afbce 100644
--- a/rtemsbsd/include/bsp/nexus-devices.h
+++ b/rtemsbsd/include/bsp/nexus-devices.h
@@ -70,8
Hello,
has someone a hint for me how I can use an addr2line functionality in a C++
program for the RTEMS tools (the stupid solution would be to use the addr2line
program via a child process)? I would like to map addresses from trace data to
a source/line information together with the ELF file.
Hello,
since C++ and Python seems to be the preferred languages for RTEMS Tools I
think we need also a C++ guide. I would not re-invent the wheel and just pick
up something existing. The Google C++ Style doesn't seem to be completely
stupid and it is supported out of the box by clang-format. So
Hello,
As RTEMS is using "Newlib" as its C library, sometimes RTEMS
developers need to contribute codes directly to it. For example in
my GSoC Project, I have to port various headers to Newlib.
This requires building Newlib on local system, making changes,
using right autoconf-tools version, creat
Dear RTEMS developers, qualifiers,
I am involved with the ESA funded RTEMS (SMP) qualification activity,
and I, with colleagues, will be exploring how formal verification techniques
can help.
We will not "formally prove" all of RTEMS, but will focus on critical
parts of the code, particularly t
Hello,
Since this fenv environment is not working as expected,
The testsuite I made in Linux environment is yet to be ported to RTEMS.
Vaibhav Gupta
On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 3:26 PM Vaibhav Gupta
wrote:
> Hello,
> In yesterday's weekly meeting I mentioned about fenv problems I faced while
> deve
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 11:59 AM Chris Johns wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Libcurl is not building for the BBB using HEAD on master. The config.log
> fragment with the failure is below. It looks like something to do with the
> frame
> buffer changes ... `_bsd_fb_fb_modmodule_sys_init` ?
>
> Thanks
> Chris
Hi
It has been a very productive summer. Already it is the time for the final
evaluations. Please get them done ASAP. The deadline is September 2
but it would be nice to get them done earlier.
Thanks.
--joel
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http:
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 6:06 PM Vijay Kumar Banerjee <
vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 11:59 AM Chris Johns wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Libcurl is not building for the BBB using HEAD on master. The config.log
>> fragment with the failure is below. It looks like something
Update #3785.
Signed-off-by: Pragnesh Patel
---
bsps/include/bsp/fatal.h | 6 +-
bsps/riscv/frdme310arty/btimer/btimer.c| 108 ++
bsps/riscv/frdme310arty/clock/clockdrv.c | 266 +++
bsps/riscv/frdme310arty/config/frdme310arty.cfg
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 11:59 AM Chris Johns wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Libcurl is not building for the BBB using HEAD on master. The config.log
> fragment with the failure is below. It looks like something to do with the
> frame
> buffer changes ... `_bsd_fb_fb_modmodule_sys_init` ?
>
> Hi Chris,
Can you
On 27/8/19 6:40 pm, Chris Johns wrote:
> On 27/8/19 6:36 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>> I temporarily removed the -Wl,--gc-sections from the libbsd build and
>> disabled
>> all unused functions which pull in unresolved references. I hope this fixes
>> your
>> build problem.
>>
>
> Awesome and tha
On 27/08/2019 13:43, Chris Johns wrote:
The only difference between this patch and mine is the checksum is the smaller
base64 version of it.
Yes, it doesn't matter to me how the hash is encoded.
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone
Hi,
The only difference between this patch and mine is the checksum is the smaller
base64 version of it.
Chris
On 27/8/19 5:21 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> This picks up the new rtems-record-lttng tool.
> ---
> rtems/config/tools/rtems-tools-5-1.cfg | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+),
From: Chris Johns
---
rtems/config/tools/rtems-libbsd-5.cfg | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/rtems/config/tools/rtems-libbsd-5.cfg
b/rtems/config/tools/rtems-libbsd-5.cfg
index 8f0141b..d6157d1 100644
--- a/rtems/config/tools/rtems-libbsd-5.cfg
+++ b/rtems
From: Chris Johns
- Add support to email a single report if configured to do so.
---
rtems/config/5/bsps/beagleboneblack.bset | 2 +
source-builder/sb/setbuilder.py | 114 ++-
2 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
diff --git a/rtems/config/5/bsps/beag
From: Chris Johns
---
rtems/config/tools/rtems-tools-5-1.cfg | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/rtems/config/tools/rtems-tools-5-1.cfg
b/rtems/config/tools/rtems-tools-5-1.cfg
index 47a865e..aed3f6a 100644
--- a/rtems/config/tools/rtems-tools-5-1.cfg
+++ b/r
From: Chris Johns
---
source-builder/sb/download.py | 10 --
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/source-builder/sb/download.py b/source-builder/sb/download.py
index d8061e6..1fb0155 100644
--- a/source-builder/sb/download.py
+++ b/source-builder/sb/download.py
@
From: Chris Johns
---
rtems/config/tools/rtems-kernel-5.cfg | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/rtems/config/tools/rtems-kernel-5.cfg
b/rtems/config/tools/rtems-kernel-5.cfg
index fe538b8..bf2ec9a 100644
--- a/rtems/config/tools/rtems-kernel-5.cfg
+++ b/rtems
On 27/8/19 6:36 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 27/08/2019 09:07, Chris Johns wrote:
>> configure:19546: arm-rtems5-gcc -o conftest -qrtems
>> -B/opt/work/chris/rtems/rsb/rtems-source-builder.git/rtems/build/tmp/sb-chris-staging/arm-rtems5/lib/
>>
>> -B/opt/work/chris/rtems/rsb/rtems-source-builder
On 27/08/2019 09:07, Chris Johns wrote:
configure:19546: arm-rtems5-gcc -o conftest -qrtems
-B/opt/work/chris/rtems/rsb/rtems-source-builder.git/rtems/build/tmp/sb-chris-staging/arm-rtems5/lib/
-B/opt/work/chris/rtems/rsb/rtems-source-builder.git/rtems/build/tmp/sb-chris-staging/arm-rtems5/beagle
> On 27 Aug 2019, at 5:16 pm, Sebastian Huber
> wrote:
>
>> On 27/08/2019 02:43, Chris Johns wrote:
>>> On 26/8/19 8:16 pm, Ravindra Kumar Meena wrote:
>> Step 5:
>> Maybe it would be good to present more detail on what is needed to install
>> Trace
>> Compass. This could be in the Trace Comp
This picks up the new rtems-record-lttng tool.
---
rtems/config/tools/rtems-tools-5-1.cfg | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/rtems/config/tools/rtems-tools-5-1.cfg
b/rtems/config/tools/rtems-tools-5-1.cfg
index 47a865e..733c53d 100644
--- a/rtems/config/tools/
On 27/08/2019 02:43, Chris Johns wrote:
On 26/8/19 8:16 pm, Ravindra Kumar Meena wrote:
Hello Chris and Sebastian,
I have attached the updated LTTng sched_switch documentation patch(v4). This one
is a whole single patch.
*What changed v3 to v4:*
Sebastian's patch for rtems-libbsd patch got mer
Hi,
Attempting to use the 5-freebsd12 branch shows the previous issue I found
related to atomics has been resolved. Sebastian, thank you. However there is
another issue detailed in the config.log below.
This is built with the latest tools and RTEMS kernel.
Thanks
Chris
configure:19542: result:
34 matches
Mail list logo