Hello Peter,
did you configure the console driver?
https://docs.rtems.org/branches/master/c-user/configuring_a_system.html#configure-application-needs-console-driver
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax
On 24/09/2019 15:34, Joel Sherrill wrote:
Before I update the compliance tracking to add pselect(), have any other
POSIX methods been added recently which I have missed?
This is only a partial implementation. The signal mask stuff is not
supported. I needed it for the new ping/ping6 commands.
On 25/9/19 1:08 am, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 9:41 AM Joel Sherrill wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 21, 2019, 10:18 AM wrote:
On Sep 21, 2019, at 11:03 , Joel Sherrill wrote:
On Sat, Sep 21, 2019, 9:55 AM Peter Dufault wrote:
I’ve searched but can’t find anywhere. I’d
On 25/9/19 1:03 am, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> Hi mko,
>
> RTEMS has a fairly strong relationship (dependency) with newlib, and
> that has been working well for a long time. Although the prospect of
> having a way to 'drop-in' alternative libc could be nice for small
> targets, it would be of more
> On Sep 24, 2019, at 17:41 , Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 4:29 PM Peter Dufault wrote:
>>
>> I've started testing the PowerPC MVME5500 "beatnik" BSP on the mainline.
>> I've run through the majority of the RTEMS tests, with some failures, but
>> when I went to run
On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 4:29 PM Peter Dufault wrote:
>
> I've started testing the PowerPC MVME5500 "beatnik" BSP on the mainline.
> I've run through the majority of the RTEMS tests, with some failures, but
> when I went to run any basic programs they do not produce any output. They
> are
I've started testing the PowerPC MVME5500 "beatnik" BSP on the mainline. I've
run through the majority of the RTEMS tests, with some failures, but when I
went to run any basic programs they do not produce any output. They are
obviously running, I can put in a "sleep(3)" and observe it, but no
---
user/bsps/arm/beagle.rst | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/user/bsps/arm/beagle.rst b/user/bsps/arm/beagle.rst
index 87c6ecf..fe2dc6f 100644
--- a/user/bsps/arm/beagle.rst
+++ b/user/bsps/arm/beagle.rst
@@ -61,9 +61,9 @@ Add the following to a file
On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 11:00 PM Vijay Kumar Banerjee <
vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 8:42 PM Gedare Bloom wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 2:14 AM Vijay Kumar Banerjee
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sun, Sep 22, 2019, 1:22 PM Niteesh wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 8:42 PM Gedare Bloom wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 2:14 AM Vijay Kumar Banerjee
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 22, 2019, 1:22 PM Niteesh wrote:
> >>
> >> Sorry, for so many questions.
> >> But I was actually following the latest quick start guide, but it is
>
---
testsuites/smptests/Makefile.am | 16 ++
testsuites/smptests/configure.ac| 2 +
testsuites/smptests/smpmrsp02/init.c| 231
testsuites/smptests/smpmrsp02/smpmrsp02.doc | 15 ++
4 files changed, 264 insertions(+)
create mode 100755
On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 10:03 AM Gedare Bloom wrote:
>
> Hi mko,
>
> RTEMS has a fairly strong relationship (dependency) with newlib, and
> that has been working well for a long time. Although the prospect of
> having a way to 'drop-in' alternative libc could be nice for small
> targets, it would
On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 2:14 AM Vijay Kumar Banerjee
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 22, 2019, 1:22 PM Niteesh wrote:
>>
>> Sorry, for so many questions.
>> But I was actually following the latest quick start guide, but it is lacking
>> information on building and running applications, the last page
On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 9:41 AM Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 21, 2019, 10:18 AM wrote:
>>
>>
>> > On Sep 21, 2019, at 11:03 , Joel Sherrill wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sat, Sep 21, 2019, 9:55 AM Peter Dufault wrote:
>> > I’ve searched but can’t find anywhere. I’d like to see the
Hi mko,
RTEMS has a fairly strong relationship (dependency) with newlib, and
that has been working well for a long time. Although the prospect of
having a way to 'drop-in' alternative libc could be nice for small
targets, it would be of more interest to us to see ways to optimize
newlib to shrink
Hi
Before I update the compliance tracking to add pselect(), have any other
POSIX methods been added recently which I have missed?
Thanks.
--joel
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 7:38 AM Sebastian Huber wrote:
>
> Module:rtems-libbsd
> Branch:master
> Commit:
Hi List,
I just got this news from my RSS feed, after a brief read, I think this is a
better and simpler alternative of newlib library, Does anyone know how to use
it in rtems project?
mko
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
On 24/9/19 4:06 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> Hello,
>
> with the libedit development package mentioned by Gedare,
Thank you for testing this.
> I got a bit further in the build:
>
> onfig: tools/rtems-llvm-8.0.1.cfg
> package: rtems-llvm-8.0.1-x86_64-linux-gnu-1
> building:
Hello,
with the libedit development package mentioned by Gedare, I got a bit
further in the build:
onfig: tools/rtems-llvm-8.0.1.cfg
package: rtems-llvm-8.0.1-x86_64-linux-gnu-1
building: rtems-llvm-8.0.1-x86_64-linux-gnu-1
error: building rtems-llvm-8.0.1-x86_64-linux-gnu-1
Build FAILED
19 matches
Mail list logo
