Re: raspberry BSP: Maybe there is a bug in the linker file?

I will do it by either today or tomorrow. On Fri, 20 Dec, 2019, 12:03 PM Sebastian Huber, < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > On 19/12/2019 15:28, Niteesh wrote: > > As far as I know, 0x8000 is a fixed address where the bootloader jumps > > to after loading the application assuming

Re: raspberry BSP: Maybe there is a bug in the linker file?

On 19/12/2019 15:28, Niteesh wrote: As far as I know, 0x8000 is a fixed address where the bootloader jumps to after loading the application assuming the CPU is in 32bit mode. For 64bit mode, it jumps to 0x8. Would you mind testing this patch:

[PATCH] bsp/raspberrypi: Fix linker command file

The RTEMS entry point must be at 0x8000. Update #3774. --- bsps/arm/raspberrypi/start/linkcmds.in | 13 ++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/bsps/arm/raspberrypi/start/linkcmds.in b/bsps/arm/raspberrypi/start/linkcmds.in index d99b4fe23e..fde75877e7 100644

Re: [PATCH] config: Remove Ada configuration options

On 19/12/2019 15:20, Joel Sherrill wrote: What native GNAT version do you use to build the RTEMS GNAT? I use the same major versions, e.g. GCC 7 (sparc) or 9 (riscv). -- Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16 Fax

Re: [PATCH] config: Remove Ada configuration options

Given a cursory review, this looks OK. What native GNAT version do you use to build the RTEMS GNAT? --joel On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 9:26 AM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > Update #3845. > --- > cpukit/include/rtems/confdefs.h | 80 >

Re: raspberry BSP: Maybe there is a bug in the linker file?

On 19/12/2019 14:24, Christian Mauderer wrote: Hello, triggered by the discussion regarding RTEMS on raspberrypi 3 I did some tests. I haven't been able to start a RTEMS on my Pi 1 if I tried a version after commit c5fd79cd4704a4270ba0114a1009ab8556f997c9 from 29.07.2019. Right before it

Re: [PATCH v3] libmisc/top: Fix the idle time and priorities on SMP

On 16/12/2019 02:29, chr...@rtems.org wrote: From: Chris Johns - This patch is based on the patch attached to #3552 submitted by jameszxj. Closes #3552 I tested and pushed the patch. It looks good now: ENTER:Exit SPACE:Refresh S:Scroll A:All <>:Order +/-:Lines Uptime:

Re: raspberry BSP: Maybe there is a bug in the linker file?

On 19/12/2019 14:27, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 19/12/2019 14:24, Christian Mauderer wrote: >> Hello, >> >> triggered by the discussion regarding RTEMS on raspberrypi 3 I did some >> tests. I haven't been able to start a RTEMS on my Pi 1 if I tried a >> version after commit

Re: raspberry BSP: Maybe there is a bug in the linker file?

As far as I know, 0x8000 is a fixed address where the bootloader jumps to after loading the application assuming the CPU is in 32bit mode. For 64bit mode, it jumps to 0x8. On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 6:58 PM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > On 19/12/2019 14:24,

raspberry BSP: Maybe there is a bug in the linker file?

Hello, triggered by the discussion regarding RTEMS on raspberrypi 3 I did some tests. I haven't been able to start a RTEMS on my Pi 1 if I tried a version after commit c5fd79cd4704a4270ba0114a1009ab8556f997c9 from 29.07.2019. Right before it everything works as expected. The commit changes the

[PATCH] config: Improve EDF SMP scheduler configuration

Use CONFIGURE_MAXIMUM_PROCESSORS to configure the EDF SMP scheduler context. This avoids hard to debug configuration errors resulting in memory corruptions. Close #3815. --- cpukit/include/rtems/confdefs.h | 3 +-- cpukit/include/rtems/scheduler.h | 10 +++---

[PATCH] c-user: Document rtems_object_get_local_node()

Close #3841. --- c-user/object_services.rst | 28 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+) diff --git a/c-user/object_services.rst b/c-user/object_services.rst index 544ff02..860ce8c 100644 --- a/c-user/object_services.rst +++ b/c-user/object_services.rst @@ -49,6 +49,8 @@