Re: SPDX License Identifier Only and Full Copy?

Hello, I just want to speak up here. I talked with Sebastian today and I really tend to keep the license text in each file. Rational: - With the BSD license, anyone can pick any file from the RTEMS repo and use/modify it in any project (and this is fine). The original authors (and their

Re: SPDX License Identifier Only and Full Copy?

Hello, On 18/02/2020 16:58, Gedare Bloom wrote: I suggest to use a master COPYING file and use file headers without the full license text. https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2018-December/024198.html It would be nice to get some feedback here. I'm generally ok with just the spdx and

Status of implementation of fenv.h test suites

Hello The current fenv.h test suite supports only basic functions that check that fenv.h environment is present or not I would like to extend the test suite further What more functions can be added to it. -Eshan Dhawan ___ devel mailing list

Re: Project query

On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 6:29 PM Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2020, 6:12 PM John Millard wrote: >> >> Greetings: >> >> I took Joel’s week-long class in June. > > > :) Thanks. Hope you enjoyed it. > >> I’m currently retired and looking for a project, but clearly not a GSoC guy. >>

Re: Project query

On Wed, Feb 19, 2020, 6:12 PM John Millard wrote: > Greetings: > > I took Joel’s week-long class in June. > :) Thanks. Hope you enjoyed it. I’m currently retired and looking for a project, but clearly not a GSoC > guy. The default list of tickets is mostly old or currently assigned. >

Project query

Greetings: I took Joel’s week-long class in June. I’m currently retired and looking for a project, but clearly not a GSoC guy. The default list of tickets is mostly old or currently assigned. The “open projects” page looks more relevant. I can buy hardware if somewhat reasonably priced. Having

Re: Project query

On Wed, Feb 19, 2020, 12:58 PM Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 9:45 AM suyash singh > wrote: > > > > sorry clicked reply instead of "reply all" > > > > > > I don't have any boards and experience. What interests me about this > project is that microblaze is used in FPGA which are

Open Source Hackathon Mentorship Invitation

Message sent on behalf of Misha Patel: Hello, My name is Misha Patel and I’m reaching out on behalf of the HackIllinois Outreach team. HackIllinois is a 36-hour collegiate Open Source hackathon that takes place annually at the University of

Re: Tool Roadmap for the RTEMS Pre-Qualification

On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 8:44 AM Jose Valdez wrote: > > Hello Gedare, > > Thank you for your review. > > Please find my answers below. > > Best regards > > José > > -Original Message- > From: Gedare Bloom [mailto:ged...@rtems.org] > Sent: quarta-feira, 19 de fevereiro de 2020 15:05 > To:

Re: Project query

On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 9:45 AM suyash singh wrote: > > sorry clicked reply instead of "reply all" > > > I don't have any boards and experience. What interests me about this project > is that microblaze is used in FPGA which are used in a variety of fields like > science, medicine and defence.

Re: rtems-test returns all test as invalid output

On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 5:08 PM Eshan Dhawan wrote: > rtems-test --rtems-bsp=erc32-run > can you please try --rtems-bsp=erc32-sis > --rtems-tools=$HOME/development/rtems/5/ > ~/development/rtems/kernel/erc32/sparc-rtems5/c/erc32/testsuites/samples > Hello, > I ran this command and it showed

Re: Ticket #3515: covoar failure while running for full testsuites

On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 12:08 AM Bran S wrote: > Hi Guys, > > Hi Bran! > I am trying to understand and solve Ticket #3515. > https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3515 > > $ /home/user45/quick-start/rtems/5/share/rtems/tester/bin/covoar - > -S >

Re: Project query

sorry clicked reply instead of "reply all" I don't have any boards and experience. What interests me about this project is that microblaze is used in FPGA which are used in a variety of fields like science, medicine and defence. Porting an os to it would be a great contribution On Tue, Feb 18,

RE: Tool Roadmap for the RTEMS Pre-Qualification

Hello Gedare, Thank you for your review. Please find my answers below. Best regards José -Original Message- From: Gedare Bloom [mailto:ged...@rtems.org] Sent: quarta-feira, 19 de fevereiro de 2020 15:05 To: Jose Valdez Cc: sebastian huber; rtems-de...@rtems.org Subject: Re: Tool

Re: Tool Roadmap for the RTEMS Pre-Qualification

Hi Jose, Thank you for the detailed information. I have a few questions: 1) Will the output of test analysis and report generator tools be plaintext, and will it be structured or unstructured (flat file)? 2) Do you consider the covoar tool as viable for code coverage? That is what we have been

Re: GSOC: Call for Mentors

Hello Gedare, I also want to Co-mentor a project. --Vaibhav Gupta On Tue, Feb 18, 2020, 11:21 AM Amaan Cheval wrote: > Hey! I'd like to co-mentor a project too. Thanks! > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 8:56 AM Vijay Kumar Banerjee < > vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Gedare, >> >> Please

Re: Top of file: licence header or Doxygen comment?

On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 6:03 AM Sebastian Huber wrote: > > On 19/02/2020 13:56, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2020, 6:30 AM Sebastian Huber > > > > wrote: > > > > On 19/02/2020 13:01, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2020,

RE: Tool Roadmap for the RTEMS Pre-Qualification

Hello, Following the e-mail sent by Sebastian, please find here the missing information, regarding the tools for RTEMS pre qualification. Best regards José === Test Executor === The Test Executor will be the software that manages the execution of the RTEMS Tests. It will set the necessary

[PATCH] c-user: Clarify CONFIGURE_MAXIMUM_PRIORITY

Update #3875. --- c-user/configuring_a_system.rst | 43 ++--- 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/c-user/configuring_a_system.rst b/c-user/configuring_a_system.rst index d6d9411..5deabd7 100644 --- a/c-user/configuring_a_system.rst

Re: Top of file: licence header or Doxygen comment?

On 19/02/2020 13:56, Joel Sherrill wrote: On Wed, Feb 19, 2020, 6:30 AM Sebastian Huber > wrote: On 19/02/2020 13:01, Joel Sherrill wrote: > On Wed, Feb 19, 2020, 12:21 AM Chris Johns mailto:chr...@rtems.org> >

Re: Top of file: licence header or Doxygen comment?

On Wed, Feb 19, 2020, 6:30 AM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > On 19/02/2020 13:01, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2020, 12:21 AM Chris Johns > > wrote: > > > > On 19/2/20 5:18 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > > I want to

Re: Top of file: licence header or Doxygen comment?

On 19/02/2020 13:01, Joel Sherrill wrote: On Wed, Feb 19, 2020, 12:21 AM Chris Johns > wrote: On 19/2/20 5:18 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > I want to add a header and source file header template to the RTEMS Software > Engineering manual. What should be

Re: Top of file: licence header or Doxygen comment?

On Wed, Feb 19, 2020, 12:21 AM Chris Johns wrote: > On 19/2/20 5:18 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > I want to add a header and source file header template to the RTEMS > Software > > Engineering manual. What should be on the top of the file? The license > header or > > the Doxygen file comment

rtems-test returns all test as invalid output

rtems-test --rtems-bsp=erc32-run --rtems-tools=$HOME/development/rtems/5/ ~/development/rtems/kernel/erc32/sparc-rtems5/c/erc32/testsuites/samples Hello, I ran this command and it showed all tests were invalid in psxtests and only one tests was successful in samples -Eshan

Re: [4.11 PATCH] libcsupport/newlib: Call newlib's __sinit to force reent initialisation

On 19/02/2020 05:57, Chris Johns wrote: On 18/2/20 7:33 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 18/02/2020 01:25, chr...@rtems.org wrote: From: Chris Johns - Newlib overtites any FILE pointers set in stdin, stdout or stderr. Closes #3870 [...] The worker_task in newlib01 has different pointers and

AW: [PATCH v4 0/3] [rtems-libbsd] Fix compilation for amd64

Hi Chris, > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Chris Johns [mailto:chr...@rtems.org] > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 19. Februar 2020 00:13 > An: Sommer, Jan; devel@rtems.org > Betreff: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] [rtems-libbsd] Fix compilation for amd64 > > On 18/2/20 9:21 pm, Jan Sommer wrote: > > Similar

[PATCH v2] eng: Rework file template section

Update #3053. --- v2: Clarify COPYING update and placeholders. eng/coding-file-hdr.rst | 169 +++- 1 file changed, 139 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) diff --git a/eng/coding-file-hdr.rst b/eng/coding-file-hdr.rst index c724c5d..e6ebaf1 100644 ---

Re: [PATCH] LICENSE.BSD-2-Clause: Prefer no license text

On 19/02/2020 08:54, Chris Johns wrote: On 19/2/20 6:13 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: Update #3053. --- LICENSE.BSD-2-Clause | 11 ++- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) Maybe we should remove this file. It duplicates content from the new COPYING file and the RTEMS

Re: [PATCH] eng: Rework file template section

On 19/2/20 7:03 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 19/02/2020 08:54, Chris Johns wrote: >>> +Check if the top-level :file:`COPYING` file needs an update. >> What needs to be updated? I think there needs to more detail here, ie add >> your >> name etc. > > What about: > > Check the top-level

[4.11 PATCH v2] libmisc/shell: Fix the handling of joel scripts in telnet

From: Chris Johns - Fix the passing of std[in/out] to child threads - Fix deleting of managed memory in the key destructor - Only set the key in the main loop thread - Only allocate a shell env outside of the main loop - Fix memory leak if the task start fails - Remove error level from shell

Re: [PATCH] eng: Rework file template section

On 19/02/2020 08:54, Chris Johns wrote: +Check if the top-level :file:`COPYING` file needs an update. What needs to be updated? I think there needs to more detail here, ie add your name etc. What about: Check the top-level :file:`COPYING` file. If you are a new copyright holder, then add

[4.11 PATCH v2] libcsupport/newlib: Call newlib's __sinit to force reent initialisation

From: Chris Johns - Newlib overtites any FILE pointers set in stdin, stdout or stderr. Closes #3870 --- cpukit/libcsupport/src/newlibc_reent.c | 5 - testsuites/libtests/newlib01/init.c| 8 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git