Re: Ticket #3515: covoar failure while running for full testsuites

On Wed, 19 Feb 2020 at 22:51, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote: > > > > On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 12:08 AM Bran S wrote: >> >> Hi Guys, >> > Hi Bran! >> >> I am trying to understand and solve Ticket #3515. >> https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3515 >> >> $ /home/user45/quick-start/rtems/5/share/rtems/tester/

Re: [PATCH] drvmgr: Fix determination of prefix in grlib uart driver

On 20/02/2020 17:34, Gedare Bloom wrote: Yes, I'll push in the next few minutes. Thanks, I forwarded the patch to Gaisler more than a week ago, but didn't receive an answer. -- Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany Phone : +49 89 189 47 4

Re: GSOC: Call for Mentors

Hello Gedare, I probably have no time to be a mentor this year. It depends a bit on the project and the student. I can help out as an active co-mentor. -- Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16 Fax : +49 89 18

Re: Project query

All right. I will get started with coverity right away On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 1:02 AM Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 10:56 AM suyash singh > wrote: > > > > I found this interesting project > > https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3710 > > > > There are no prerequisites given for this

[PATCH v2] Add Amaan to MAINTAINERS

--- MAINTAINERS | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index f00f2753f2..437b55418b 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ Ben Gras b...@rtems.org Pavel Pisa pp...@pikron.com Christian Mauderer

Re: [PATCH] Add Amaan to MAINTAINERS

Made this patch before fetching/rebasing master, so it won't apply cleanly. v2 after rebasing is on its way. On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 10:15 AM Amaan Cheval wrote: > --- > MAINTAINERS | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > index 2732d773c4..99f473ef

[PATCH] Add Amaan to MAINTAINERS

--- MAINTAINERS | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 2732d773c4..99f473efe0 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ Ben Gras b...@rtems.org Martin Galvan martin.gal...@tallertechnologies.com Pave

Re: SPDX License Identifier Only and Full Copy?

On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 2:49 PM Chris Johns wrote: > > On 21/2/20 3:20 am, Gedare Bloom wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 12:58 AM Thomas Doerfler > > wrote: > >> > >> Hello, > >> > >> I just want to speak up here. I talked with Sebastian today and I really > >> tend to keep the license text in

Re: SPDX License Identifier Only and Full Copy?

On 2020-02-21 12:15 +1100, Chris Johns wrote: > > Does the Linux kernel rules apply to the 2 clause BSD license we have? I don't think so but I've always included BSD licenses in the file as the license expressly states that it should be included. This on top of adding an SPDX marker. Also, t

Re: Loading RTEMS applications from u-boot on Raspberry Pi 2

Hii Cláudio, On Fri, 21 Feb, 2020, 4:55 AM Cláudio Maia (clrrm), wrote: > Hi Niteesh, > > Thank you for your input. Following your suggestion allowed me to boot > successfully RTEMS from u-boot. > Moreover, I confirm that “-O rtems" does not work for me as well. > Your welcome :) I have a few

Re: SPDX License Identifier Only and Full Copy?

On 21/2/20 12:11 pm, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2020, 3:49 PM Chris Johns > wrote: > > On 21/2/20 3:20 am, Gedare Bloom wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 12:58 AM Thomas Doerfler > > > wrote:

Re: Loading RTEMS applications from u-boot on Raspberry Pi 2

Hi Jan, I tried your solution and it does not work in my case. The following is an example of the output that I get: — U-Boot> fatload mmc 0 0x3000 hello.exe reading hello.exe 3456844 bytes read in 269 ms (12.3 MiB/s) U-Boot> bootelf 0x3000 CACHE: Misaligned operatio

Re: Loading RTEMS applications from u-boot on Raspberry Pi 2

Hi Niteesh, Thank you for your input. Following your suggestion allowed me to boot successfully RTEMS from u-boot. Moreover, I confirm that “-O rtems" does not work for me as well. I have a few questions that I would like to ask you. What exactly is going on when we execute “bootm 0x20 - 0

Re: GSOC: Call for Mentors

> On Feb 17, 2020, at 14:58 , Gedare Bloom wrote: > > Assuming we get accepted on 2/20, I will be able to start adding mentors > shortly after. Please let me know if you're interested to mentor this summer, > either in a primary or co-mentor capacity. As usual, I will provide "backup" > men

Re: SPDX License Identifier Only and Full Copy?

On 21/2/20 3:20 am, Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 12:58 AM Thomas Doerfler > wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I just want to speak up here. I talked with Sebastian today and I really >> tend to keep the license text in each file. >> >> Rational: >> >> - With the BSD license, anyone can pi

Re: Project query

On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 10:56 AM suyash singh wrote: > > I found this interesting project > https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3710 > > There are no prerequisites given for this one > This one is a bit on the open-ended side. You should get started by looking at our current status with Coverity, and t

Re: GSOC 2020 project query

On 20/02/2020 20:26, Gedare Bloom wrote: > I answered in your initial email. In general, it is OK for you to > "ping" an email that has not been responded to in about 5-7 days. And for the GSoC tickets: If there is an owner, don't hesitate to add him on CC. Some of us have filters that highlight m

Re: GSOC 2020 project query

On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 12:24 PM Christian Mauderer wrote: > > Hello Utkarsh, > > On 20/02/2020 19:07, Utkarsh Rai wrote: > > Based on @Gedare Bloom's feedback, adding memory protection > > or enhancing Wi-fi Support in > > libbsd

Re: GSOC 2020 project query

I answered in your initial email. In general, it is OK for you to "ping" an email that has not been responded to in about 5-7 days. On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 11:07 AM Utkarsh Rai wrote: > > Based on @Gedare Bloom's feedback, adding memory protection or enhancing > Wi-fi Support in libbsd are two

Re: Project for GSoC 2020

On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 12:45 PM Utkarsh Rai wrote: > > Based on your feedback, adding memory protection or enhancing Wi-fi Support > in libbsd are two projects that I would like to work upon. > > For MMU support I think a lot unmerged PowerPC code is already present, but > since I would be us

Re: GSOC 2020 project query

Hello Utkarsh, On 20/02/2020 19:07, Utkarsh Rai wrote: > Based on @Gedare Bloom's feedback,  adding memory protection >  or enhancing Wi-fi Support in > libbsd  are two projects that I > would like to work upon. Both sound

Re: GSoC organizations list announced

Heartiest Congratulations and best wishes to everyone! On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 6:40 PM Vaibhav Gupta wrote: > Congratulations. RTEMS > ___ > devel mailing list > devel@rtems.org > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel __

GSoC organizations list announced

Congratulations. RTEMS ___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

GSOC 2020 project query

Based on @Gedare Bloom's feedback, adding memory protection or enhancing Wi-fi Support in libbsd are two projects that I would like to work upon. For MMU support I think a lot unmerged PowerPC code is already present, but

Re: Project query

I found this interesting project https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3710 There are no prerequisites given for this one On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 10:31 PM Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 9:43 AM suyash singh > wrote: > > > > So can I work on x86_64 BSP without hardware with simulator? >

Re: Project query

On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 9:43 AM suyash singh wrote: > > So can I work on x86_64 BSP without hardware with simulator? > https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/2898 > > Also out of the prerequisites I only know C programming language but I am > ready to learn everything else. > I think it will be too hard

Re: Project query

On Wed, 19 Feb 2020 at 21:38, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2020, 12:58 PM Gedare Bloom wrote: >> >> On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 9:45 AM suyash singh >> wrote: >> > >> > sorry clicked reply instead of "reply all" >> > >> > >> > I don't have any boards and experience. What interests m

Re: Project query

So can I work on x86_64 BSP without hardware with simulator? https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/2898 Also out of the prerequisites I only know C programming language but I am ready to learn everything else. On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 9:13 AM Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 6:29 PM Joel S

Re: [PATCH] drvmgr: Fix determination of prefix in grlib uart driver

Yes, I'll push in the next few minutes. On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 1:41 AM wrote: > > Hello, > > Could someone please push this change? > There has been a lot of activity on this list recently, and I fear I will > lose track at some point. > > Cheers, > >Jan > > > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht--

Re: Error in building rv32imac BSP

On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 9:23 AM Jiri Gaisler wrote: > > > On 2/20/20 5:03 PM, Eshan Dhawan wrote: > > > > make[3]: Leaving directory > > '/home/eshan/development/rtems/kernel/rtems/rv32imac/riscv-rtems5/c/rv32imac' > > checking for RTEMS_CPU_MODEL... > > checking for RTEMS_BSP_FAMILY... riscv > >

Re: Error in building rv32imac BSP

On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 9:24 AM Mritunjay Sharma wrote: > > Hi Eshan, > > I think the error here is "no acceptable cc found in $PATH" which means GCC > compiler might be missing > > Please try to fix it with : > > sudo apt install gcc > > Or > > sudo apt install build-essential > > If GCC compile

Re: Error in building rv32imac BSP

Hi Eshan, I think the error here is "no acceptable cc found in $PATH" which means GCC compiler might be missing Please try to fix it with : sudo apt install gcc Or sudo apt install build-essential If GCC compiler is already installed, there are chances that symbolic link is missing. In that

Re: Error in building rv32imac BSP

On 2/20/20 5:03 PM, Eshan Dhawan wrote: > > make[3]: Leaving directory > '/home/eshan/development/rtems/kernel/rtems/rv32imac/riscv-rtems5/c/rv32imac' > checking for RTEMS_CPU_MODEL... > checking for RTEMS_BSP_FAMILY... riscv > checking for CPU_CFLAGS... (cached) -march=rv32imac -mabi=ilp32 > che

Re: SPDX License Identifier Only and Full Copy?

On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 12:58 AM Thomas Doerfler wrote: > > Hello, > > I just want to speak up here. I talked with Sebastian today and I really > tend to keep the license text in each file. > > Rational: > > - With the BSD license, anyone can pick any file from the RTEMS repo and > use/modify it i

Error in building rv32imac BSP

/home/eshan/development/rtems/kernel/rtems/configure --prefix=/home/eshan/development/rtems/5 --enable-maintainer-mode --target=riscv-rtems5 --enable-rtemsbsp=rv32imac --enable-tests --enable-posix --disable-networking --enable-cxx I ran this command and it returns the output hecking for gmake...

Waf Build System Status in RTEMS?

Hello, Are there any progress updates to the Waf build system integration in RTEMS? I have pulled [1] and it seems like it hasn't got many updates since December. I wonder what's still remaining/blocking to merge it, or at least push it as a development branch (without re-writing history) that ot

Re: Status of implementation of fenv.h test suites

On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 2:33 AM Vaibhav Gupta wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2020, 12:47 PM Eshan Dhawan > wrote: > >> Hello >> The current fenv.h test suite supports only basic functions that check >> that fenv.h environment is present or not >> I would like to extend the test suite further >>

AW: [PATCH] drvmgr: Fix determination of prefix in grlib uart driver

Hello, Could someone please push this change? There has been a lot of activity on this list recently, and I fear I will lose track at some point. Cheers, Jan > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: devel [mailto:devel-boun...@rtems.org] Im Auftrag von Jan Sommer > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 12.

Re: Status of implementation of fenv.h test suites

On Thu, Feb 20, 2020, 12:47 PM Eshan Dhawan wrote: > Hello > The current fenv.h test suite supports only basic functions that check > that fenv.h environment is present or not > I would like to extend the test suite further > What more functions can be added to it. > Test all the functions of f

[PATCH v3] eng: Rework file template section

Update #3053. --- v2: Clarify COPYING update and placeholders. v3: * Prefer verbatim licence texts. * Add Python file template. eng/coding-file-hdr.rst | 251 ++-- 1 file changed, 221 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) diff --git a/eng/coding-file-hdr.r