Re: [PATCH] RTEMS Docs: Fix search field

2020-02-22 Thread Amar Takhar
Hi Niteesh, I updated it and created a patch for this here: https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3880/ It does fix the issue once it's approved I will push the changes. Thank you for highlighting this issue! Amar. ___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org

Re: [PATCH] RTEMS Docs: Fix search field

2020-02-22 Thread Niteesh G. S.
Hii On Sun, 23 Feb, 2020, 2:07 AM Chris Johns, wrote: > Hi > > How did you test this patch? > As I already told the search field works without this patch in sphinx versions newer than v1.6.4. This is a bug with all version of sphinx between v1.6.4 and v.1.5.0 So to reproduce this bug in my loca

Update sphinx_rtd_theme to 68a19ca / 0.4.3.dev0.

2020-02-22 Thread Amar Takhar
I've been running this version for a while now. It should fix any issues we're having I tested it and it works fine. See here for a ticket the patch is rather large: https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3880 Amar. ___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org

Re: [PATCH] RTEMS Docs: Fix search field

2020-02-22 Thread Chris Johns
Hi How did you test this patch? I have applied the patch, cleaned, built and installed the built docs, opened the User manual and searched for "Windows" and it found nothing. I am not sure if this is my set up, I am in another country to the machine with the docs. It could be something else. Tha

Re: [PATCH] Fix a minor "suspect" -> "subject" wording error

2020-02-22 Thread Chris Johns
Pushed. Thanks Chris On 22/2/20 10:17 pm, Martin Erik Werner wrote: > --- > The word "suspect" here looked like a mistake and I have changed it > based on this assumption. > > If it is not a mistake, what does "suspect" mean in this context? > > c-user/self_contained_objects.rst | 2 +- > 1 fi

Re: [PATCH] Add CoreMark Benchmark

2020-02-22 Thread Hesham Almatary
On Fri, 21 Feb 2020 at 18:16, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > Is this being added to rtems-examples? > Yes > Is it clear where this came from (URL) and what version it is per the origin? > The submodule has a link to our fork. It's clear it's forked from eembc/coremark and it has all copyrights+license

Re: [PATCH] RTEMS Docs: Fix search field

2020-02-22 Thread Niteesh G. S.
We could also fix this issue by updating sphinx to a newer version. But this patch will not break anything even if updated to the newer version. On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 5:35 PM G S Niteesh Babu wrote: > This patch fixes the search field which previously was not working > due to this commit 71dd

[PATCH] RTEMS Docs: Fix search field

2020-02-22 Thread G S Niteesh Babu
This patch fixes the search field which previously was not working due to this commit 71dd8bfbf94417ad55b2444e1dbd219db266f335 in sphinx. --- common/sphinx_rtd_theme_rtems/layout.html | 3 ++- common/sphinx_rtd_theme_rtems/layout_old.html | 3 ++- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(

[PATCH] Fix a minor "suspect" -> "subject" wording error

2020-02-22 Thread Martin Erik Werner
--- The word "suspect" here looked like a mistake and I have changed it based on this assumption. If it is not a mistake, what does "suspect" mean in this context? c-user/self_contained_objects.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/c-user/self_contained_objects.