Remove a spurious "is undefined. " fragment which was likely a leftover
from sentence re-use.
---
c-user/self_contained_objects.rst | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/c-user/self_contained_objects.rst
b/c-user/self_contained_objects.rst
index 1c1e664..0be1423
Add a description of the previously missing RTEMS_NOT_DEFINED return
value for rtems_rate_monotonic_get_status().
Update the RTEMS_SUCCESSFUL return value descriptions for
rtems_rate_monotonic_get_status() and
rtems_rate_monotonic_get_statistics() which incorrectly used the same
description as
On 2020-02-29 04:18, Amar Takhar wrote:
On 2020-02-28 09:25 -0700, Gedare Bloom wrote:
If there is enough work, and the work can be suitably identified, then
it can also be a possible GSoC. There are also other possibilities to
improve our existing Python code bases to adhere to some proposed
On 2020-02-28 17:20, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 28/02/2020 06:23, Chris Johns wrote:
Hi,
Please find attached an error log for libbsd for the BBB.
This should be already fixed:
https://git.rtems.org/rtems-libbsd/commit/?id=7606ec29778f1fabf70f3fc10edca02155d02c8c
Looks like my mistake, I
---
user/hosts/posix.rst | 20 ++--
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/user/hosts/posix.rst b/user/hosts/posix.rst
index b46497c..d89d1a2 100644
--- a/user/hosts/posix.rst
+++ b/user/hosts/posix.rst
@@ -74,13 +74,29 @@ provide a manual override:
CentOS
Gotcha. And re-adding the devel@ mailing list.
It is just a matter of the RPM name changing (and likely the pax
implementation).
I will update the Users Guide and post a patch.
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 4:12 PM Jeff Mayes wrote:
> Yes, spax is the rpm. So, “yum install spax” and you get the
>> On 29 Feb 2020, at 6:10 am, Jeff Mayes wrote:
>
> Aha! So, spax provides pax now, and spax is in the BaseOS Repo. That’ll
> need to be updated in the documentation.
>
We need the PAX format from any source. I switched to the pax command because
POSIX defines it and silly me thought a
Pax to spax as an rpm?
I will try to.make a simple patch and let you review it
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020, 2:10 PM Jeff Mayes wrote:
> Aha! So, spax provides pax now, and spax is in the BaseOS Repo. That’ll
> need to be updated in the documentation.
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Joel
And regardless of the value of count it is successful?
> On Feb 28, 2020, at 12:17 , suyash singh wrote:
>
> count is unsigned int and will always be >=0.
>
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 10:42 PM suyash singh
> wrote:
> ---
> bsps/shared/grlib/1553/b1553brm.c | 6 ++
> 1 file changed, 2
On 2020-02-28 12:39 -0600, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
> We can't blanket upgrade tools to Python 3. The only thing I think we agreed
> when this was recently discussed is that we have categories of tools in Python
> and some have to be compatible with Python 2 and 3.
I wasn't suggesting that. I
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 11:18 AM Amar Takhar wrote:
> On 2020-02-28 09:25 -0700, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> > >
> > If there is enough work, and the work can be suitably identified, then
> > it can also be a possible GSoC. There are also other possibilities to
> > improve our existing Python code
On 2020-02-28 09:25 -0700, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> >
> If there is enough work, and the work can be suitably identified, then
> it can also be a possible GSoC. There are also other possibilities to
> improve our existing Python code bases to adhere to some proposed
> Python coding conventions, which
count is unsigned int and will always be >=0.
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 10:42 PM suyash singh
wrote:
> ---
> bsps/shared/grlib/1553/b1553brm.c | 6 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/bsps/shared/grlib/1553/b1553brm.c
> b/bsps/shared/grlib/1553/b1553brm.c
>
---
bsps/shared/grlib/1553/b1553brm.c | 6 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bsps/shared/grlib/1553/b1553brm.c
b/bsps/shared/grlib/1553/b1553brm.c
index 57ef70126b..4041423541 100644
--- a/bsps/shared/grlib/1553/b1553brm.c
+++
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 2:41 AM Sebastian Huber
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> there are several Python docstring formats available:
>
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3898572/what-is-the-standard-python-docstring-format
>
> The reStructuredText Docstring Format (Sphinx) is recommended by PEP 287:
>
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 5:34 AM Christian Mauderer
wrote:
>
> Hello Anmol,
>
> On 28/02/2020 10:31, Anmol Mishra wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I was going through the list of potential projects for GSoC 2020, I love
> > working with automation tools and "Code Formatting and Style Check for
> > RTEMS
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 5:10 AM Christian Mauderer
wrote:
>
> Hello Anmol,
>
> On 28/02/2020 10:49, Anmol Mishra wrote:
> > I can see python2 code being used. And as of 2020 python2 has been
> > depreciated but I assume everyone is aware of that. Is there any active
> > plan to shift the
This follow up from Jeff didn't hit the list.
On top of pax may be an inactive/dead project, there is the issue that
Grsecurity
has been cited as violating the GPL with their business of providing kernel
patches
to paying customers but not allowing redistribution of those patches.
dt/libfdt.h%/cpukit/include/libfdt.h%g' 00*
> sed -i 's%/libfdt/libfdt_env.h%/cpukit/include/libfdt_env.h%g' 00*
> --
> 2.16.4
>
> ___
> devel mailing list
> devel@rtems.org
> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
-
I had logged the verbose output from waf building the testsuite, but I
missed a couple of linker options in my makefile. It links now.
Is there a standalone rtems-libbsd example with a waf script or makefile?
Thank your for your quick response,
Alan
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 1:25 AM Sebastian Huber
On 28/02/2020 13:57, Joel Sherrill wrote:
I'm not opposed to this. I noticed a local uncommitted patch I posted a
while
back to bump dtc in rtems-tools. What about that as well?
It probably doesn't hurt to update this.
I updated the dtc code in RTEMS just because it was mentioned as an
I'm not opposed to this. I noticed a local uncommitted patch I posted a
while
back to bump dtc in rtems-tools. What about that as well?
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020, 12:52 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> ---
> cpukit/dtc/VERSION | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3
Hello Anmol,
On 28/02/2020 10:31, Anmol Mishra wrote:
> Hello,
> I was going through the list of potential projects for GSoC 2020, I love
> working with automation tools and "Code Formatting and Style Check for
> RTEMS score" looks exciting to me. I saw you edited the wiki and the
> owner was not
Hello Anmol,
On 28/02/2020 10:49, Anmol Mishra wrote:
> I can see python2 code being used. And as of 2020 python2 has been
> depreciated but I assume everyone is aware of that. Is there any active
> plan to shift the codebase. I am open to discussion for this.
We have the problem that some long
Hello Gedare and Chris,
On 27/02/2020 23:14, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 3:01 PM Chris Johns wrote:
>>
>> On 28/2/20 7:23 am, Alan Cudmore wrote:
>>> I noticed that the Zephyr RTOS (https://www.zephyrproject.org) uses a
>>> device tree based initialization for all of its BSPs.
I can see python2 code being used. And as of 2020 python2 has been
depreciated but I assume everyone is aware of that. Is there any active
plan to shift the codebase. I am open to discussion for this.
Regards
Anmol
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
Hello,
there are several Python docstring formats available:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3898572/what-is-the-standard-python-docstring-format
The reStructuredText Docstring Format (Sphinx) is recommended by PEP 287:
https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0287/
I suggest to use this one
Hello,
I worked a bit on Python development guidelines this week and noticed
that our Doxygen style guide is not really clear if function
descriptions should be in descriptive-style or imperative-style:
https://docs.rtems.org/branches/master/eng/coding-doxygen.html#function-declarations
The
Hello,
I was going through the list of potential projects for GSoC 2020, I love
working with automation tools and "Code Formatting and Style Check for
RTEMS score" looks exciting to me. I saw you edited the wiki and the owner
was not mentioned so pinging you for the same.
I have read the
29 matches
Mail list logo
