> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Johns [mailto:chr...@rtems.org]
> Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2020 3:21 AM
> To: Sebastian Huber; Sommer, Jan; devel@rtems.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] bsps/pc386: Fix IPI for non-consecutive APICIDs
>
> On 15/7/20 7:54 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> >
On 15/7/20 7:54 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 08/07/2020 08:55, jan.som...@dlr.de wrote:
>> Could someone please push this patch to the branches 5 and master?
>> Or do I need a ticket for the 5 branch first?
>
> If it is a bug fix, then the official procedure would be to add tickets for
> RTEMS
Apologies as I mistakenly sent this as a private mail.
I missed to tag Chris, Gedare and RTEMS Devel and that's why sending this
again on what
I responded.
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 10:35 PM Mritunjay Sharma <
mritunjaysharma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 7:48 PM Heinz Junkes
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 6:55 AM Richi Dubey wrote:
>
> Another quick question:
> typedef struct {
>
> #if defined(RTEMS_SMP)
> ...
> Chain_Control Scheduler_nodes;
>
> #endif
> /**
>* @brief The scheduler nodes of this thread.
>*
>* Each thread has a scheduler node for each scheduler
Hello, Mritunjay,
I'm afraid I've lost track of the situation. I am also still on holiday in
Norway for 2 weeks and
I don't always have perfect internet access.
Where can I find your blog. I only found something from June 9th. What is the
current location of the blog?
I'm afraid you've made a
Another quick question:
typedef struct {
#if defined(RTEMS_SMP)
...
Chain_Control Scheduler_nodes;
#endif
/**
* @brief The scheduler nodes of this thread.
*
* Each thread has a scheduler node for each scheduler instance.
*/
Scheduler_Node *nodes;
} Thread_Scheduler_control;
Why d
Hi,
I had a small question. The scheduler struct inside percpu.h looks like:
--
struct {
/**
* @brief The scheduler control of the scheduler owning this
processor.
*
*
Hello Niteesh,
I have currently no time to review this work. I am busy with the
preparations to integrate the new build system. A broken ARM compiler
delayed my testing a bit (this is related to another GSoC project).
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178
On 08/07/2020 08:55, jan.som...@dlr.de wrote:
Could someone please push this patch to the branches 5 and master?
Or do I need a ticket for the 5 branch first?
If it is a bug fix, then the official procedure would be to add tickets
for RTEMS 5 and 6. Since we had no working SMP support before I
Hello,
I would like to add some more information regarding these patches here.
These patches are currently not meant to replace the OpenFirmWare API from
libBSD.
For these patches to be completely compatible with libBSD we must support
creating and
registering *xref's* since the drivers use the *
>
> Ah OK. Can Richi hold the changes locally until we work through the
> process to
> bring this work into the project?
Yes, it'd be at least two weeks before I test my all changes and send a
patch.
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 5:22 AM Chris Johns wrote:
> On 8/7/20 3:35 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
11 matches
Mail list logo
