Re: How to run the full RTEMS testsuite

Thanks, I'll check it out. On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 6:57 AM Eshan Dhawan wrote: > > On 11-Apr-2021, at 1:15 AM, Ida Delphine wrote: > >  > For some reason I get this: > rtems-test: command not found > I've used this command a few times and it worked. I don't know what I > am doing wrong now...

Re: #3860 - GSoC enquiries

Hello all, I made some changes to my initial proposal draft based on some feedback I got. Here's is the modified version. Please help me review and suggest improvements. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VADJh3_kIhs578IEmBJ98rjR6p5E1XcksUkq1Ms4jRA/edit?usp=sharing Cheers, Ida. On Fri, Apr 9,

Tool update procedure (was Re: Fwd: GCC 10.3 Released)

On 10/4/21 1:19 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > On Fri, Apr 9, 2021, 9:07 AM Sebastian Huber > > wrote: > > On 08/04/2021 14:50, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > Is it time to bump the RSB GCC version for rtems6? > I am not sure, we are always quite

Re: [PATCH rtems-libbsd] Import telnetd from RTEMS repository

On 9/4/21 10:49 pm, Joel Sherrill wrote> libdebugger is probably the only service that is tied enough to RTEMS > that moving it would be a pain for maintenance. The others are just  > simple applications. libdebugger's transport layer is independent of the debugger implementation so in theory it

[PATCH] smpfatal08: halt secondary RISC-V processors

smpfatal08 fails on SMP RISC-V systems because all cpus are started by the boot-loader and clobber the test output. This patch stops the secondary cpus with a WFI (wait-for-interrupt). Harmless if only one cpu is started by the loader, as in the griscv bsp. From

Re: GSOC project: #4272 BSP Executable Conversion

Hello everyone , I am working on project "BSP Executable Conversion" (https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/4272) where I have to make BSP specific script for conversion of executables from RTEMS executable format to the BSP boot loader format so that it can be run on target. I know that the previous

Gsoc Proposal : Packaging Programming Language Draft 2

Hello Everyone, I have tried to implement the received feedback on draft 1 into this draft. I would like everyone to look into this and tell how the proposal can be improved further. Link: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1J4J114C3CrCKEV2L5vgobT-mE0f2xQx2waJTrQ0tNLQ/edit?usp=sharing --