Re: Review Request for DCAN patches

Hi Christian, I squashed the commits and pushed to the same branch. https://gitlab.com/slpp95prashanth/gsoc-2022/-/tree/can-dev-squashed1 Regards Prashanth S On Wed, 26 Oct, 2022, 10:56 pm , wrote: > Hello Prashanth, > > from my point of view the patches look good and I think you processed >

Re: Review Request for DCAN patches

Hello Prashanth, from my point of view the patches look good and I think you processed Gedares feedback too. So if no one objects I'll pus the patches on the weekend. Last version is this one: https://gitlab.com/slpp95prashanth/gsoc-2022/-/commits/30199c2af1c65f05f820a/ Like discussed in

Re: Increase Frequency of Updates of RTEMS GitHub Tools Mirroring

Am 26.10.22 um 01:06 schrieb Chris Johns: On 26/10/2022 4:46 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: In general, our current approach is quite a hack. We should do things more event driven. For example, if you want to update the RSB, then you create a pull request. This pull request starts a CI

[PATCH 2/2] user: Add documentation for leon2 and leon3 BSP

--- user/bsps/bsps-sparc.rst | 74 ++-- 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/user/bsps/bsps-sparc.rst b/user/bsps/bsps-sparc.rst index d0316a9..a2c2a47 100644 --- a/user/bsps/bsps-sparc.rst +++ b/user/bsps/bsps-sparc.rst @@ -20,11

[PATCH 1/2] user: Add documentation for NOEL-V BSP

--- user/bsps/bsps-riscv.rst | 57 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+) diff --git a/user/bsps/bsps-riscv.rst b/user/bsps/bsps-riscv.rst index 48e7ee7..73a6038 100644 --- a/user/bsps/bsps-riscv.rst +++ b/user/bsps/bsps-riscv.rst @@ -248,6 +248,63 @@ Serial

[PATCH] bsps/riscv: RISCV_MAXIMUM_EXTERNAL_INTERRUPTS

Increase RISCV_MAXIMUM_EXTERNAL_INTERRUPTS to 128 to support recent Qemu versions by default. --- spec/build/bsps/riscv/optextirqmax.yml | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/spec/build/bsps/riscv/optextirqmax.yml b/spec/build/bsps/riscv/optextirqmax.yml index

Re: [PATCH] bsps/arm: fix Cortex-M7 systick reload value

Hello Dariusz, thanks for the fix. I added a ticket and checked it in. We definitely have to improve our clock driver validation tests. We will add a ticket for this. Kind regards, Sebastian -- embedded brains GmbH Herr Sebastian HUBER Dornierstr. 4 82178 Puchheim Germany email:

[PATCH] bsps/arm: fix Cortex-M7 systick reload value

>From e17fb5abf82d03baf25ee16433c9d6e9861e3e3a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dariusz Sabala Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 11:11:20 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] bsps/arm: fix Cortex-M7 systick reload value - see ARM DUI 0646C Arm Cortex-M7 Devices Generic User Guide "The RELOAD value is calculated