Re: bsp/riscv: Store/AMO address misaligned trap occured

2022-11-02 Thread Padmarao.Begari
Hi Gedare, > On Wed, 2022-11-02 at 09:58 -0600, Gedare Bloom wrote: > > t0 contains the address of .Lsecondary_processor_go > > start.S has: > ```asm > #if __riscv_xlen == 32 > .align 2 > #elif __riscv_xlen == 64 > .align 3 > #endif > > .Lsecondary_processor_go: > ``` > Can you confirm

Re: Fwd: Identify 3rd party source in spec?

2022-11-02 Thread Chris Johns
On 3/11/2022 2:50 pm, Chris Johns wrote: > On 3/11/2022 10:30 am, Gedare Bloom wrote: >> It was pointed out in Discord that the "third_party_list" command is >> unusual with respect to other waf commands, which are given as oneword >> formats (other than bsp_list and bsp_defaults). I think it

Re: Fwd: Identify 3rd party source in spec?

2022-11-02 Thread Chris Johns
On 3/11/2022 10:30 am, Gedare Bloom wrote: > It was pointed out in Discord that the "third_party_list" command is > unusual with respect to other waf commands, which are given as oneword > formats (other than bsp_list and bsp_defaults). I think it makes sense > to go with such a oneword format for

Re: Fwd: Identify 3rd party source in spec?

2022-11-02 Thread Gedare Bloom
It was pointed out in Discord that the "third_party_list" command is unusual with respect to other waf commands, which are given as oneword formats (other than bsp_list and bsp_defaults). I think it makes sense to go with such a oneword format for consistent commands. So I will instead start

Re: bsp/riscv: Store/AMO address misaligned trap occured

2022-11-02 Thread Gedare Bloom
t0 contains the address of .Lsecondary_processor_go start.S has: ```asm #if __riscv_xlen == 32 .align 2 #elif __riscv_xlen == 64 .align 3 #endif .Lsecondary_processor_go: ``` Can you confirm the value of __riscv_xlen is properly defined to 64 for the PolarFire? On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at

Re: Fwd: Identify 3rd party source in spec?

2022-11-02 Thread Gedare Bloom
On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 9:10 AM Gedare Bloom wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 1:10 AM Christian MAUDERER > wrote: > > > > Hello Chris, > > > > Am 01.11.22 um 22:08 schrieb Chris Johns: > > > On 2/11/2022 3:25 am, o...@c-mauderer.de wrote:> Is it a good idea to > > > make it a > > > mandatory

Re: Fwd: Identify 3rd party source in spec?

2022-11-02 Thread Gedare Bloom
On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 9:14 AM Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > > On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 10:10 AM Gedare Bloom wrote: >> >> On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 1:10 AM Christian MAUDERER >> wrote: >> > >> > Hello Chris, >> > >> > Am 01.11.22 um 22:08 schrieb Chris Johns: >> > > On 2/11/2022 3:25 am,

Re: Fwd: Identify 3rd party source in spec?

2022-11-02 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 10:10 AM Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 1:10 AM Christian MAUDERER > wrote: > > > > Hello Chris, > > > > Am 01.11.22 um 22:08 schrieb Chris Johns: > > > On 2/11/2022 3:25 am, o...@c-mauderer.de wrote:> Is it a good idea to > make it a > > > mandatory

Re: Fwd: Identify 3rd party source in spec?

2022-11-02 Thread Gedare Bloom
On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 1:10 AM Christian MAUDERER wrote: > > Hello Chris, > > Am 01.11.22 um 22:08 schrieb Chris Johns: > > On 2/11/2022 3:25 am, o...@c-mauderer.de wrote:> Is it a good idea to make > > it a > > mandatory attribute? It makes the yaml files > >> bigger. It will only mean that we

Re: Text Formatting Patches coming

2022-11-02 Thread Gedare Bloom
On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 9:46 AM Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > > On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 8:55 AM Gedare Bloom wrote: >> >> On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 4:07 PM Chris Johns wrote: >> > >> > On 1/11/2022 2:59 am, Gedare Bloom wrote: >> > > I am planning to roll out several text formatting changes over the

Re: Fwd: Identify 3rd party source in spec?

2022-11-02 Thread Christian MAUDERER
Hello Chris, Am 01.11.22 um 22:08 schrieb Chris Johns: On 2/11/2022 3:25 am, o...@c-mauderer.de wrote:> Is it a good idea to make it a mandatory attribute? It makes the yaml files bigger. It will only mean that we have to look for copy and paste bugs instead of missing attributes if someone

bsp/riscv: Store/AMO address misaligned trap occured

2022-11-02 Thread Padmarao.Begari
Hi Sebastian, The "Store/AMO address misaligned" trap occured in the "start.S" at "amoswap.w zero, zero, 0(t0)" while testing the sample application with the latest RTEMS master for RISC-V on the Microchip PolarFire SoC. The trap occured after this