Re: [PATCH v2 00/32] Integrate pre-qualified LEON3 BSP

On 29/6/2023 3:41 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 16.06.23 08:00, Sebastian Huber wrote: >> The register block specification were recently integrated in the RTEMS >> Software Engineering manual.  Now it is time to integrate the >> pre-qualified LEON3 BSP which uses the generated GRLIB header

Re: [RSB 2/4] 6: Update GCC 10 and 12

On 28/6/2023 3:33 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 28.06.23 04:37, Chris Johns wrote: >> Can you please provide something other than update in the commit message? >> >> If it is to pick up patches on these gcc release branches then please say so. > > This update has no particular reason. I just

Re: [PATCH rtems] Remove unused _IO_Relax

/ On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 12:17 PM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > On 28.06.23 19:02, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 11:29 AM Sebastian Huber > > > > wrote: > > > > On 28.06.23 18:17, Joel Sherrill

Re: [PATCH rtems-central] spec/wake-after: Update references to intervals

Thanks, v2 coming shortly. Kinsey On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 1:28 PM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > On 28.06.23 20:22, Kinsey Moore wrote: > > rtems_task_wake_after takes a parameter in terms of a count of clock > > ticks and not a measure in a subunit of seconds.

[PATCH rtems-central v2] spec/wake-after: Update references to intervals

rtems_task_wake_after takes a parameter in terms of a count of clock ticks and not a measure in a subunit of seconds. This updates documentation to reflect that and recommends clock_nanosleep() for applications requiring sleep for a time-based duration instead of a count of clock ticks. Updates

Re: [PATCH rtems-central] spec/wake-after: Update references to intervals

On 28.06.23 20:22, Kinsey Moore wrote: rtems_task_wake_after takes a parameter in terms of a count of clock ticks and not a measure in a subunit of seconds. This updates documentation to reflect that and recommends clock_nanosleep() for applications requiring sleep for a time-based duration

[PATCH rtems-docs v2] c-user: Update references to rtems_task_wake_after

rtems_task_wake_after takes a parameter in terms of a count of clock ticks and not a measure in a subunit of seconds. This updates documentation to reflect that. Updates #4772 --- c-user/scheduling-concepts/background.rst | 8 c-user/task/operations.rst| 6 +++--- 2

[PATCH rtems-central] spec/wake-after: Update references to intervals

rtems_task_wake_after takes a parameter in terms of a count of clock ticks and not a measure in a subunit of seconds. This updates documentation to reflect that and recommends clock_nanosleep() for applications requiring sleep for a time-based duration instead of a count of clock ticks. Updates

Re: [PATCH v2 00/32] Integrate pre-qualified LEON3 BSP

On 16.06.23 08:00, Sebastian Huber wrote: The register block specification were recently integrated in the RTEMS Software Engineering manual. Now it is time to integrate the pre-qualified LEON3 BSP which uses the generated GRLIB header files. The existing tests in the RTEMS test suite are

Re: [PATCH rtems] Remove unused _IO_Relax

On 28.06.23 19:02, Joel Sherrill wrote: On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 11:29 AM Sebastian Huber > wrote: On 28.06.23 18:17, Joel Sherrill wrote: > On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 11:07 AM Sebastian Huber > mailto:sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de>

Re: [PATCH rtems] Remove unused _IO_Relax

On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 11:29 AM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > On 28.06.23 18:17, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 11:07 AM Sebastian Huber > > > > wrote: > > > > On 28.06.23 18:05, Joel Sherrill

Re: [PATCH rtems] Remove unused _IO_Relax

On 28.06.23 18:17, Joel Sherrill wrote: On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 11:07 AM Sebastian Huber > wrote: On 28.06.23 18:05, Joel Sherrill wrote: > The only use was in a test. This function is used by this patch set:

Re: [PATCH rtems] Remove unused _IO_Relax

On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 11:07 AM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > On 28.06.23 18:05, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > The only use was in a test. > > This function is used by this patch set: > > https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2023-June/075497.html (1) Not in the

Re: [PATCH rtems] Remove unused _IO_Relax

On 28.06.23 18:05, Joel Sherrill wrote: The only use was in a test. This function is used by this patch set: https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2023-June/075497.html -- embedded brains GmbH Herr Sebastian HUBER Dornierstr. 4 82178 Puchheim Germany email:

[PATCH rtems] Remove unused _IO_Relax

The only use was in a test. --- cpukit/include/rtems/score/io.h| 8 --- cpukit/score/src/iorelax.c | 53 - spec/build/cpukit/librtemscpu.yml | 1 - spec/build/testsuites/validation/libvalidation.yml | 1 -