Re: Bug #4923: ARM VFP context switch fix

Hello Cedric, thanks for having a look at this. On 06.02.24 16:37, Cedric Berger wrote: Hello, I've started to investigate bug #4923. A first problem can be found after applying the following patch to the paranoia.exe test:

Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] libtest: Add packet processor

On 5/2/2024 9:13 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > Hello Chris, > > thanks for having a look at it. > > On 02.02.24 00:14, Chris Johns wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Thanks for the updated documentation, protocol and use cases. It has helped. >> Now >> I understand some of the context I have raised further

Bug #4923: ARM VFP context switch fix

Hello, I've started to investigate bug #4923. A first problem can be found after applying the following patch to the paranoia.exe test: https://devel.rtems.org/attachment/ticket/4923/bug-1-make-paranoia-test-fail.patch The test fails because of the added sleep(1) at the beginning of Init()