Re: Desirable Application Stacks (Add-On Library Collections)

> On 2017-January-03, at 13:38, Christian Mauderer > wrote: > > - Ursprüngliche Mail - >> Von: "Joel Sherrill" >> An: "RTEMS Devel" >> Gesendet: Dienstag, 3. Januar 2017 19:41:14 >> Betreff: Desirable Application

Re: [RTEMS Project] #3240: cpukit/libmisc/stackchk/check.c stack addresses formatted incorrectly.

Joel, I followed all of Chris’ instructions as much as I understood: > On 2017-November-16, at 21:21, Chris Johns > wrote: > > On 17/11/2017 15:05, gro...@chichak.ca wrote: >> >> (I don’t know how to proceed with getting

Re: devel.rtems.org down?

Thanks Chris and Amar. Andrei > On 2019-September-02, at 19:04, Chris Johns wrote: > > On 3/9/19 10:48 am, Mr. Andrei Chichak wrote: >> Poking around, I find that devel.rtems.org isn’t >> answering. > > We are suffering a sustained load on Trac that is overloading

Re: V5.x porting guide or prototypical example?

Thank you Seb and Joel. I’ll do it. One of our customers Flock Audio (flockaudio.com) has a product on the market, PATCH, that uses an STM32F767 and RTEMS. The product is a replacement for a professional audio studio patch bay that is used to route microphones, instruments, compressors and

V5.x porting guide or prototypical example?

\Good day, A while back I put together a BSP for STM32F7 based on the STM32F407 BSP for an early version of RTEMS 5. Now that RTEMS 5 became 5.0, the BSP structure has moved around quite a bit and I need to redo my BSP. Is there a porting guide for 5.0 yet, or is there a shining example of a

Re: Purpose of _Copyright_Notice?

On 2020-May-05, at 06:37, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > The original intent wasn't as much a copyright notice as to just > leave some breadcrumb the system was based on RTEMS. I don't > know that even when it was introduced, there was any guarantee > it would be there. > > Any ideas on how to leave

Re: Interest in Virtual RTEMS Workshop

Hi Joel, About two weeks ago, a lady from Seattle organized a kite makers workshop, but virtual, over Google Meet. 3 sessions Friday afternoon, 8 Saturday, and 8 on Sunday. With very little fore notice, she managed to get people from Germany, England, Australia, Columbia, Argentina, as well

Re: Having a problem with an out of the box setup for STM32F4

I spent a bunch of time conversing with Chris Johns on Discord about this issue and Chris, with infinite patience, helped me find a possible issue. Using rtems-exeinfo -O we noticed an issue | __atexit.c: -mcpu=arm7tdmi -marm -march=armv4t | __call_atexit.c

Re: The compiler settings for Cortex-M4

Good day Sebastian, I was able to step through the boot process and see memset working properly this time. Then I was able to reach Init(); Now back to my BSP for the F767 and the ultimate goal of ethernet and mdns. Thanks for your help, Andrei > On 2021-September-13, at 23:56, Sebastian

Re: Guidance on constructing an RTEMS6 BSP

Hi Sebastian, So far there is no code. The BSP won’t build. The only code is: ../source-builder/sb-set-builder --prefix=$HOME/quick-start/rtems/6 --target=arm-rtems6 --with-rtems-bsp=stm32f4 --with-rtems-tests=yes 6/rtems-kernel Andrei > On 2021-August-10, at 00:20, Sebastian Huber >

Re: Having a problem with an out of the box setup for STM32F4

Sorry, I put in newlib and this stupid mail program put in newly. > On 2021-August-10, at 15:48, Mr. Andrei Chichak wrote: > > From what I can figure out, there seems to be a problem with the > out-of-the-box build of newly that the STM32F4 uses. > > memset() goes for a few ARM instructions

Re: Having a problem with an out of the box setup for STM32F4

> On 2021-August-12, at 03:36, Sebastian Huber > wrote: > > On 11/08/2021 18:22, Mr. Andrei Chichak wrote: >> On 2021-August-11, at 01:06, Sebastian >> Huber wrote: >>> On 10/08/2021 23:48, Mr. Andrei Chichak wrote: From what I can figure out, there seems to be a problem with the

Re: RTEMS_FATAL_SOURCE_EXCEPTION during startup

It’s bombing in printf. It’s so early that the stack hasn’t been set up yet, and it’s found an error and it’s trying to poot a message out on the console, which is also not set up yet. Umm, what could be wrong? Lemme think… (I’ve worked wth this bsp in RTEMS4.11, and a version in RTEMS5) I

Hands up, do you use the Mini Robomind BSP (MRM332)?

Hi all,The Mini Robomind is a board that was available through the Seattle Robotics Society that used the Motorola MC68332 processor. The BSP is called MRM332.I was wondering if anybody uses this BSP, either for a Mini Robomind or as a basis for some other MC68332 board?Why? I was talking with

Hands up, do you use the Mini Robomind BSP (MRM332)?

Hi all, The Mini Robomind is a board that was available through the Seattle Robotics Society that used the Motorola MC68332 processor. The BSP is called MRM332. I was wondering if anybody uses this BSP, either for a Mini Robomind or as a basis for some other MC68332 board? Why? I was talking