Re: Testing Newlib patches

the coding conventions and rules. Thanks, Aditya Upadhyay On Wed, 22 Apr 2020, 05:09 Gedare Bloom, wrote: > On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 3:48 PM Eshan Dhawan > wrote: > > > > Found it :) > > > > Share it for posterity. > > > Thanks > > > > &g

Re: Update POSIX compliance guide

and what we need to include in RTEMS or RTEMS-LibBSD. Thanks, Aditya Upadhyay On Thu, 26 Mar 2020, 02:32 Joel Sherrill, wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 3:43 PM Eshan Dhawan > wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 1:49 AM Gedare Bloom wrote: >> &

Re: [PATCH v9] tests for fenv.h functions

One more thing, If Vaibhav has provided you this source code and you modified then put Vaibhav's name alongwith your name as Copyright info. On Thu, 26 Mar 2020, 23:10 Aditya Upadhyay, wrote: > > > On Thu, 26 Mar 2020, 22:59 Eshan dhawan, wrote: > >> --- >> tests

Re: [PATCH v9] tests for fenv.h functions

On Thu, 26 Mar 2020, 22:59 Eshan dhawan, wrote: > --- > testsuites/psxtests/psxfenv01/init.c| 87 - > testsuites/psxtests/psxfenv01/psxfenv01.doc | 9 ++- > testsuites/psxtests/psxfenv01/psxfenv01.scn | 4 - > 3 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) > >

Re: Sources to port fenv.h to ARM and AARCH64

On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 1:56 AM Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > > On Sat, Mar 21, 2020, 3:16 PM Aditya Upadhyay wrote: >> >> On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 1:30 AM Joel Sherrill wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 3:03 AM Aditya U

Re: Sources to port fenv.h to ARM and AARCH64

On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 1:30 AM Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > > On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 3:03 AM Aditya Upadhyay wrote: >> >> >> >> On Sat, 21 Mar 2020, 10:29 Eshan Dhawan, wrote: >>> >>> I went through the FreeBSD and NetBSD sources for

Re: [PATCH v7] tests for fenv.h functions

On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 11:04 PM Eshan Dhawan wrote: > > > > On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 10:48 PM Aditya Upadhyay wrote: >> >> On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 9:32 PM Eshan Dhawan wrote: >> > >> > I have added the changes as told by Aditya >> > I w

Re: [PATCH v7] tests for fenv.h functions

On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 9:32 PM Eshan Dhawan wrote: > > I have added the changes as told by Aditya > I would like to know is any other changes are required to be made to make the > patch usable > > Thanks > Eshan > > On 21-Mar-2020, at 8:20 PM, Eshan dhawan wrote: > > > > --- > >

Re: Sources to port fenv.h to ARM and AARCH64

On Sat, 21 Mar 2020, 10:29 Eshan Dhawan, wrote: > I went through the FreeBSD and NetBSD sources for implementation > In FreeBSD there is an architecture-specific implementation with different > header file for each architecture it supports . > Whereas in NetBSD there is a single fenv.h defined

Re: [PATCH v6] tests for fenv.h functions

= 0 ) rtems_test_assert ( fegetround() == FE_DOWNWARD ) ; ===> same here. Thanks, Aditya Upadhyay On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 12:21 AM Eshan Dhawan wrote: > > > > On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 12:19 AM Eshan Dhawan wrote: >> >> Hello Everyone, >> I had sent this patch a

Re: [PATCH] test for fegetround and fesetround

if you find one and send a patch to newlib mailing list. You may be spending most of the gsoc duration contributing to Newlib rather than RTEMS. Regards, Aditya Upadhyay On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 1:26 AM Eshan Dhawan wrote: > > hello everyone, > I am new here and I sent the patches: >

Re: [PATCH v3] ndbm test suite

You should also add these two files: .scn file and .doc file. On Tue, Jul 9, 2019, 5:48 PM Vaibhav Gupta wrote: > --- > testsuites/psxtests/Makefile.am | 7 + > testsuites/psxtests/configure.ac | 1 + > testsuites/psxtests/psxndbm01/init.c | 251 +++ > 3

Re: [PATCH v4] Port ndbm

On Tue, Jul 9, 2019, 11:49 PM Vaibhav Gupta wrote: > --- > newlib/libc/include/ndbm.h | 91 ++ > newlib/libc/search/Makefile.am | 1 + > newlib/libc/search/ndbm.c | 220 + > 3 files changed, 312 insertions(+) > create mode 100644

Re: [PATCH v2] port ndbm

On Wed, Jun 26, 2019, 8:32 PM Vaibhav Gupta wrote: > --- > newlib/libc/include/ndbm.h | 84 + > newlib/libc/search/Makefile.am | 1 + > newlib/libc/search/ndbm.c | 215 + > 3 files changed, 300 insertions(+) > create mode 100644

Re: Error: undefined reference to ndbm functions

On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 5:58 PM Joel Sherrill wrote: > > If you have finished ndbm, please do not attempt to write memcpy for SPARC. > It is not as important as having fenv.h methods. We have a default memcpy > implementation for all architectures. The hope was to find an already > implemented

Re: [PATCH v2] port ndbm

On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 11:14 AM Vaibhav Gupta wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 10:08 AM Aditya Upadhyay wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 2:11 AM Vaibhav Gupta >> wrote: >> > >> > Hello Gedare, >> > as you suggeste

Re: [PATCH v2] port ndbm

On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 2:11 AM Vaibhav Gupta wrote: > > Hello Gedare, > as you suggested, to use the group name of patch as 'newlib'. > I did that and then removed the line"%patch setup newlib -p1" > It has generated ndbm.h in include directory. > You are applying the patches to RSB just

Re: [PATCH] Add Testsuite for PSXINTTYPES01

.8eafae11ac > --- /dev/null > +++ b/testsuites/psxtests/psxinttypes01/init.c > @@ -0,0 +1,233 @@ > +/** > + * @file > + * @brief Test suite for inttypes.h methods > + */ > + > +/* > + * SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause > + * > + * Copyright (C) 2019, Aditya U

Re: [PATCH] Add Test suite for inttypes.h (psxinttypes.exe) in testsuites/psxtests

On Sat, Jun 1, 2019 at 10:22 PM Gedare Bloom wrote: > > > > On Sat, Jun 1, 2019, 8:29 AM Aditya Upadhyay wrote: >> >> On Sat, Jun 1, 2019 at 5:03 AM Gedare Bloom wrote: >> > >> > On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 10:17 AM Aditya Upadhyay >> > wrote:

Re: [PATCH] Add Test suite for inttypes.h (psxinttypes.exe) in testsuites/psxtests

On Sat, Jun 1, 2019 at 5:03 AM Gedare Bloom wrote: > > On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 10:17 AM Aditya Upadhyay wrote: > > > > Hi VARoDeK, > > > > This looks fine to me. I would love to see other's responses. > > > > This test is not right, it needs to be re

Re: [PATCH] Add Test suite for inttypes.h (psxinttypes.exe) in testsuites/psxtests

Hi VARoDeK, This looks fine to me. I would love to see other's responses. On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 8:47 PM VARoDeK wrote: > > --- > testsuites/psxtests/Makefile.am | 7 + > testsuites/psxtests/configure.ac | 1 + > testsuites/psxtests/psxinttypes01/init.c |

Re: Instructions to send a Patch

On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 12:52 AM Gedare Bloom wrote: > > On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 8:23 PM Vaibhav Gupta > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 11:47 AM Aditya Upadhyay > > wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 10:42 P

Re: Instructions to send a Patch

I try that? > Because there is need to mention alternative source path for header files, to > compile ndbm.c. > You can do this manually, but it would be a wise approach to use autoreconf. > . > Thankyou > Vaibhav Gupta > > > On Mon, 27 May, 2019, 7:38 PM Aditya Upadhyay, wrote: >

Instructions to send a Patch

Hi Vaibhav, You have sent a completely wrong patch. You do not need to include all these files what are existed there. You should generate a patch for your work like addition or modification or if you have added any other file. This patch should go to newlib mailing list. For your entire GSoC

Re: GSoC 2019

On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 11:05 AM Sebastian Huber wrote: > > On 02/04/2019 07:28, Vaibhav Gupta wrote: > > I had this discussion under comments section in my drafted proposal. > > Aditya said we will be using the Version control, they are using, to > > figure out the origin of file. > > It is much

Re: [PATCH] Add Test suite for inttypes.h (psxinttypes.exe) in testsuites/psxtests

Hi Vaibhav, Please send a patch using git. git send-email LOCATION_OF_PATCH_FILE --to devel@rtems.org --cc=Other_EMAIL_ID On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 10:36 AM Vaibhav Gupta wrote: > > Hello, > As guided by Aditya, and with init.c file provided by him, I have > successfully created patch for

Re: POSIX Compilance- #2966, GSoC Project 2019

On Tue, 19 Mar 2019, 22:42 Joel Sherrill, wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 10:29 AM Vaibhav Gupta > wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 4:40 AM Gedare Bloom wrote: >> >>> On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 2:24 PM Joel Sherrill wrote: >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > On Sun, Mar 17, 2019, 12:45 PM

Re: GSoC: Guidance for POSIX Compilance

ppreciated if you send a patch on devel. It will help you to understand the code flow and relation between the newlib c and rtems. inttypes methods test suite location: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1vnb0KBhkYLTPzbRJPMuwsnyWLP694VAa > Thanks > Vaibhav Gupta Thanks, Aditya Upadhyay ___

Re: [PATCH] POSIX inttypes Testsuite

iar with Copyright and license related things. > > There is no .doc file giving a description of the test purposes/cases. > Thanks for pointing it. Added it now. > > > On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 11:32 AM Aditya Upadhyay wrote: >> >> --- >> testsuites/psxtests/

[PATCH] Tests for inttypes methods

--- testsuites/psxtests/Makefile.am| 12 ++ testsuites/psxtests/configure.ac | 1 + testsuites/psxtests/psxinttypes01/init.c | 122 + .../psxtests/psxinttypes01/psxinttypes01.scn | 27 + 4 files changed, 162

Re: Errors returned while building a SPARC tool set

Hi Dannie, Did you check the python version? It should be a development version. First run this command: sudo apt-get python2.7-dev then try ../source-builder/sb-set-builder --log=1-sparc.txt --prefix=$HOME/development/rtems config/5/rtems-sparc64.bset Hope, It will solve your problem.

Re: error while running rtems-test with coverage

You can use this command to send a patch to devel: git send-email LOCATION_OF_PATCH_FILE --to devel@rtems.org --cc=_EMAIL_ID It makes easier to review the patch. On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 6:10 PM, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote: > I managed to get the tests running with the

Re: RSB build failure

install python-dev... Will solve the issue. If you are using ubuntu.. sudo apt-get install python-dev. On Sat, Mar 17, 2018, 3:30 PM Amaan Cheval wrote: > Hi! > > > checking for python... > /Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.7/bin/python > > checking for

Re: devel Digest, Vol 76, Issue 39

. You should double check it against the RSB to make sure the options are the same. Any comments and suggestions from senior member of community would be appreciated. Thanks & Regards, Aditya Upadhyay M.Tech - Indian Institute of Technology (ISM), Dhanbad, Voice: +91-9128811628 (M) On Mon,

Re: devel Digest, Vol 76, Issue 23

t. > > Thanks & regards, > Salil Sirotia, Hi Salil Sirotia, Welcome to RTEMS Organization. I would like to suggest you to go through the POSIX Compliance doc: https://docs.rtems.org/branches/master/posix-compliance/ For this project, You need to build newlib-cygwin. Here you can find n

[PATCH v2] Testsuite of inttypes methods.

--- testsuites/psxtests/psxinttypes01/init.c | 23 +++--- .../psxtests/psxinttypes01/psxinttypes01.scn | 6 +++--- 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/testsuites/psxtests/psxinttypes01/init.c b/testsuites/psxtests/psxinttypes01/init.c

[PATCH v2] Testsuite for inttypes methods

--- testsuites/psxtests/Makefile.am| 5 -- testsuites/psxtests/configure.ac | 5 -- testsuites/psxtests/psxinttypes01/init.c | 66 +++--- .../psxtests/psxinttypes01/psxinttypes01.scn | 8 +++ 4 files changed, 66

Re: [PATCH] Testsuites for inttypes methods

On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 8:08 PM, Gedare Bloom <ged...@rtems.org> wrote: > Can you merge these into one single test? they seem simple enough to > combine to me. > yes. I am doing the same. Thank you. > On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 2:30 PM, Aditya Upadhyay <aadit

[PATCH] Testsuites for inttypes methods

--- testsuites/psxtests/Makefile.am| 6 ++ testsuites/psxtests/configure.ac | 6 ++ testsuites/psxtests/psxinttypes01/Makefile.am | 22 ++ testsuites/psxtests/psxinttypes01/init.c | 58 ++

Re: Adding confstr() to rtems

On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 11:13 PM, Joel Sherrill <j...@rtems.org> wrote: > > > On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Aditya Upadhyay <aadit0...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 10:07 PM, Joel Sherrill <joel.sherr...@gmail.com> >> wrote

Re: Adding confstr() to rtems

defined in that file but these v7 constants are guarded by __CYGWIN. > On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 11:27 AM, Aditya Upadhyay <aadit0...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Hello All, >> >> I was trying to port confstr support in rtems from freebsd. In file >> unistd.h r

Adding confstr() to rtems

0 #define_CS_POSIX_V6_LPBIG_OFFBIG_CFLAGS11 #define_CS_POSIX_V6_LPBIG_OFFBIG_LDFLAGS12 #define_CS_POSIX_V6_LPBIG_OFFBIG_LIBS13 #define_CS_POSIX_V6_WIDTH_RESTRICTED_ENVS14 #endif It is working. Please correct me if i am not going in right direction. Thanks & Regards, Ad

Re: [PATCH 3/7] Import strnstr.c from FreeBSD.

Yes.. Definitely i will do. Sichen can directly send the patch for strnstr to newlib ml. Thanks, Aditya Upadhyay On 17 Aug 2017 7:03 p.m., "Joel Sherrill" <j...@rtems.org> wrote: > > > On Aug 17, 2017 8:19 AM, "Gedare Bloom" <ged...@rtems.org> wrote: &g

Checksum failure in sparc tool set building

source-builder/rtems$ Any help will be greatly appreciable. Thanks & Regards, Aditya Upadhyay ___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Generation of ccoshl.o file

-rtems4.12-newlib$ make install. I am attaching the script by which i am trying to build newlib. I do not know where i am making mistake. Thanks & Regards, Aditya Upadhyay j-newlib Description: Binary data ___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org

[PATCH] Implementation of inttypes.h and test related to its methods.

--- cpukit/inttypes/imaxabs.c | 47 +++ cpukit/inttypes/imaxdiv.c | 51 cpukit/inttypes/strtoimax.c| 131 cpukit/inttypes/strtoumax.c| 111 +

[PATCH] Implementation of inttypes.h and its tests within the samples testsuites named psxinttypes01

--- cpukit/inttypes/imaxabs.c | 5 +- cpukit/inttypes/imaxdiv.c | 26 +++ cpukit/inttypes/strtoimax.c | 170 cpukit/inttypes/strtoumax.c | 164 --- cpukit/inttypes/wcstoimax.c | 183

[PATCH 2/2] implementation of inttypes.h and test related to its methods

From: aadit0402 --- cpukit/Makefile.am | 1 + cpukit/configure.ac | 1 + cpukit/inttypes/Makefile.am | 14 +++ cpukit/inttypes/imaxabs.c| 40 + cpukit/inttypes/imaxdiv.c

Re: Offlist - Introduce Yourself to Community

uites/samples/hello/init.c @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ #include #include +#include /* forward declarations to avoid warnings */ rtems_task Init(rtems_task_argument argument); Thanks & Regards, Aditya On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 9:55 PM, Joel Sherrill <j...@rtems.org> wrote: > I am not

Re: GSoC 2017

Hello Amar, I have uploaded the first draft of my proposal. I request you and other experts to review and comment on the same. Thanks & Regards, Aditya On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 7:20 PM, Amar Takhar <a...@rtems.org> wrote: > On 2017-03-29 13:59 +0530, aditya upadhyay wrote: > >

GSoC 2017

Hello Amar, I have gone through these links what so ever, you have updated in this "ticket 2918".I have configured and installed libbsd using waf and now i am having set up for sparc(erc32), arm (xilinx_zynq_a9_qemu) ,i386/pc386 architecture and executed the hello world application as i have

GSoC 2017

Hello all, I am trying to implement pthread_condattr_getclock() in pthread.h in POSIX directory. but i am not able to understand where and which location(files and directories) these changes would require.As there are 3 pthread.h files and i think implementation of this function is done at this

Re: Help

n the open project page. On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:03 PM, Gedare Bloom <ged...@rtems.org> wrote: > Hello Aditya Upadhyay, > > What is your goal for working on / contributing to RTEMS? > > POSIX Compliance is a reasonably good project to chip away at. Joel > shoul

Help

to you. Thanks & Regards, Aditya Upadhyay Master Of Technology, Dept. of Computer Science & Engg., Indian Institute of Technology(ISM), Dhanbad Email id: aadit4...@gmail.com ___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel