POSIX Issue 8 (2024) Download Available

2024-07-19 Thread Joel Sherrill
Hi The PDF and HTML versions of the new POSIX Issue 8 are now available. I have copied the announcement below: Dear all I am pleased to announce that the html version of the 2024 edition is now available to read online, more information and registration at http://publications.opengroup.org/c243

Fwd: [PATCH] stdatomic: make atomics compatible with GCC-14

2024-07-08 Thread Joel Sherrill
This looks like a newlib patch we want to be sure to pick up in the next newlib hash update. -- Forwarded message - From: Alexey Lapshin Date: Mon, Jul 8, 2024 at 2:39 AM Subject: [PATCH] stdatomic: make atomics compatible with GCC-14 To: new...@sourceware.org https://gcc.gnu.

Fwd: [ANNOUNCEMENT] GDB 15.1 released!

2024-07-07 Thread Joel Sherrill
Thoughts on updating to this for rtems6? -- Forwarded message - From: Joel Brobecker via Gdb-announce via Gdb Date: Sun, Jul 7, 2024 at 1:04 PM Subject: [ANNOUNCEMENT] GDB 15.1 released! To: Cc: Joel Brobecker via Gdb-announce GDB 15.1 released! Release 15.1 of G

Re: Updating GitHub Mirrors?

2024-07-04 Thread Joel Sherrill
Thanks. What times? On Thu, Jul 4, 2024, 12:12 PM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > - Am 4. Jul 2024 um 18:12 schrieb Joel Sherrill j...@rtems.org: > > > On Thu, Jul 4, 2024, 1:06 AM Sebastian Huber < > > sebastian.hu..

Re: Updating GitHub Mirrors?

2024-07-04 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Thu, Jul 4, 2024, 1:06 AM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > - Am 3. Jul 2024 um 19:29 schrieb Joel Sherrill j...@rtems.org: > > > Hi > > > > When/how do the mirrors of gcc, binutlls, newlib, etc get updated? > > They are

Updating GitHub Mirrors?

2024-07-03 Thread Joel Sherrill
Hi When/how do the mirrors of gcc, binutlls, newlib, etc get updated? I just patches to newlib this morning and one was to address a small problem blocking part of a GSoC project. Thanks. --joel ___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtem

Re: removing unused third-party headers (objbsd)?

2024-06-29 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 7:30 PM Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 10:41 AM Gedare Bloom wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 11:39 PM Sebastian Huber > > wrote: > > > > > > On 28.06.24 00:42, Gedare Bloom wrote: > > > > I've been doing back through my third-party source code attri

Re: Ada

2024-06-23 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Sun, Jun 23, 2024, 12:43 PM John Howard wrote: > Hello. > > I need Ada for RTEMS on Raspberry Pi. I will settle for whichever versions > work together. > > After moving to gitlab, is Ada continuously built and tested for RTEMS? > > Today, my non-gitlab RSB 5.3 build failed on Debian with error

Re: GCC 14: m68k, sh, and sparc64

2024-06-06 Thread Joel Sherrill
I reported this to newlib@ and someone posted a patch which is now merged and mirrored to the RTEMS github. I am updating the RSB to the new newlib hash and hopefully will push the MR tomorrow for review. --joel On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 1:42 PM Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > On Sun, Apr

RTEMS Doxygen Broken

2024-06-04 Thread Joel Sherrill
Hi The subject says it all. Doesn't look like the POSIX APIs are even included, CMSIS Definitions is listed 27 times with at least some not linking to content, etc. There are other headings which appear repeatedly. I am basically ignoring the warning messages. Can someone please look at this and

Re: RFC: Deprecate Old/Unused BSPs

2024-05-31 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 2:57 AM wrote: > Hello Joel, > > Am 30.05.24 um 17:04 schrieb Joel Sherrill: > > Hi > > > > In reviewing ports for deprecation, I noticed that a few architectures > > have some very old BSPs which are unlikely to be used anymore. Dropp

RFC: Deprecate Old/Unused BSPs

2024-05-30 Thread Joel Sherrill
Hi In reviewing ports for deprecation, I noticed that a few architectures have some very old BSPs which are unlikely to be used anymore. Dropping architectures and BSPs is beneficial for a few reasons: + Architecture removal cuts down on tool configurations when building all architectures. + BSP

RFC: Deprecate MIPS port in 6.1

2024-05-30 Thread Joel Sherrill
Hi There does not appear to be any recent activity for this port in RTEMS. Thread Local Storage is not supported yet. Dynamic loading has a mips dependent file but it looks like the last work was a patch from 2016 which was committed in 2020. No idea if this works. MIPS Technologies is now a RISC

RFC: Deprecate Moxie port in 6.1

2024-05-30 Thread Joel Sherrill
Hi There does not appear to be any activity for this port and the Moxie project does not have any recent activity. Any objections to deprecating this for 6 and removing before 7? Thanks --joel ___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.

Re: Upgrading tools - gcc, binutils, and gdb

2024-05-30 Thread Joel Sherrill
.3.11 for the same toolchain. It is currently available in > Linux and Baremetal toolchains since April/May. From a maintainence > perspective, having it also in RTEMS6 releases sounds very good. > > Thanks, Daniel > > > Den 5/30/2024 kl. 1:44 AM, skrev Joel Sherrill: > >

Re: Upgrading tools - gcc, binutils, and gdb

2024-05-29 Thread Joel Sherrill
Thanks. It may be a couple of days before I have a merge request ready. Thanks. On Wed, May 29, 2024, 6:28 PM Chris Johns wrote: > On 30/5/2024 7:22 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > I am in the middle of updating gcc to the recent 13.3 release to move us > off a > > git hash. &g

Upgrading tools - gcc, binutils, and gdb

2024-05-29 Thread Joel Sherrill
Hi I am in the middle of updating gcc to the recent 13.3 release to move us off a git hash. Is there any reason we are still on gdb 13? gdb 14.1 was released in Dec 2023. Is there any reason we are still on binutils 2.41? binutils 2.42 was release in Jan 2024. I don't mind updating them if no o

Fwd: GCC 13.3 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org

2024-05-14 Thread Joel Sherrill
GCC is getting closer to a real release. When this drops, we need to switch the RSB to it for 6 tools. --joel -- Forwarded message - From: Jakub Jelinek via Gcc Date: Tue, May 14, 2024, 11:33 AM Subject: GCC 13.3 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org To: The first relea

Re: RTEMS Deployment

2024-05-03 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Thu, May 2, 2024 at 11:48 PM Chris Johns wrote: > Hi, > > This email ask for the rtems-deployment repo to be moved RTEMS/Tools in > GitLab. > > It is a repo of RSB configs to build packages of common or user specific > vertical stacks. > I am in favor of it moving. --joel > > Thanks > Chris

Submit Outstanding Patches Via GitLab

2024-05-01 Thread Joel Sherrill
Hi If you have any patches that are still pending on the mailing list, please get yourself an account on gitlab.rtems.org and submit them as a merge request. Instructions are linked to in Chris' emails. Help is available on devel@ and Discord. Thanks. --joel ___

Re: [PATCH rtems-tools v5] tester/rtemstoolkit: add renode implementation

2024-05-01 Thread Joel Sherrill
gitlab.rtems.org is now alive. Please setup an account and follow the instructions for a merge request. We need to see how well things are working. :) --joel On Sun, Apr 28, 2024 at 11:35 PM Muhammad Sulthan Mazaya < msulthanmaz...@gmail.com> wrote: > Bumping last update of last year's renode

Re: GCC 14: m68k, sh, and sparc64

2024-04-29 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Sun, Apr 28, 2024 at 3:18 PM Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > On Sun, Apr 28, 2024 at 6:17 AM Sebastian Huber < > sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> the m68k, sh, and sparc64 build fails with GCC 14 due to: >> > > Two of

Re: GCC 14: m68k, sh, and sparc64

2024-04-28 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Sun, Apr 28, 2024 at 6:17 AM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > Hello, > > the m68k, sh, and sparc64 build fails with GCC 14 due to: > Two of those are scheduled to be removed after we branch 6. So only the m68k really matters. More below. > > make "CC_FOR_BUILD=g

Re: GCC 14: nios2

2024-04-28 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Sun, Apr 28, 2024 at 6:13 AM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > Hello, > > in order to build the nios2 GCC 14, you have to add --enable-obsolete to > the configure command line. With this option, it builds fine. I am not > sure how this option can be added to the RSB

Re: Repo Transition to GitLab

2024-04-26 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Fri, Apr 26, 2024, 12:49 AM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > On 26.04.24 00:38, Chris Johns wrote: > > Hi RTEMS Community > > > > The git repos on git.rtems.org are open and accepting patches. The > GitLab repos > > will move us to main, something we have been wait

Re: RTEMS 6 branching

2024-04-23 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 12:56 PM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > - Am 21. Apr 2024 um 3:00 schrieb Chris Johns chr...@rtems.org: > > > Hi, > > > > There has been some discussion about when we will branch and it is > timely we > > discuss this. This is my input. :)

Re: RSB format changes to meet coding standard

2024-04-21 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Sat, Apr 20, 2024, 7:19 PM Chris Johns wrote: > On 19/4/2024 7:15 pm, andrew.butterfi...@scss.tcd.ie wrote: > > Will you also do this with the formal code in rtems-central/formal ? > > Sorry, I do not use it so would prefer not to update it just yet. I think > it > best left to the leaders of

Re: [rtems-tools PATCH 1/2] rtemstoolkit: Fix decoding unicode strings in output

2024-04-19 Thread Joel Sherrill
Please apply both. I think this was the only bad issue with rc2 on CentOS 7 or 8. On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 10:09 PM wrote: > From: Chris Johns > > --- > rtemstoolkit/execute.py | 12 ++-- > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/rtemstoolkit/execute.py b/rtems

Re: RSB format changes to meet coding standard

2024-04-18 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Thu, Apr 18, 2024, 7:31 PM Chris Johns wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to run the python code we own through yapf and it's default to > standardise the formatting and to being it inline with the coding > standards. It > would be good to do this before we branch for RTEMS 6. > > I can crate a pat

Re: 6.1rc3 CentOS 7 Build Sweep Report

2024-04-18 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 2:00 AM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > Hallo Joel, > > it would be nice to have the interrupt get/set priority directives in > RTEMS 6. When do you want to create the RTEMS 6 branch? > Last spring. Seriously, Chris has been cutting 6.1 rc s

Re: rtems-kernel-init.c tries to re-make existing "/etc"

2024-04-18 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 9:50 AM Peter Dufault wrote: > > > > On Apr 18, 2024, at 10:34 AM, Kinsey Moore > wrote: > > > > A patch for EEXIST here should be fine. It would be nice if the caller > were more resilient. > > > > I also changed "default-network-init.h" to assert rtems_bsd_initialize()

Fwd: Deprecation/removal of nios2 target support

2024-04-17 Thread Joel Sherrill
We should track this but if the GNU tools drop support, this is normally the trigger for RTEMS. Unless the support situation changes, I think we will have to remove nios2 in RTEMS 7 --joel -- Forwarded message - From: Sandra Loosemore Date: Wed, Apr 17, 2024, 10:28 PM Subject: D

6.1rc3 CentOS 7 Build Sweep Report

2024-04-17 Thread Joel Sherrill
Hi 6.1rc3 appears to be in pretty good shape on CentOS 7 (w/GCC 8 and Python 3 SCL). Results should be on the build@ list. One odd issue appears to be in the rtems-tester. Testing a riscv-bsp with spike, I get this output. It is repeated with other spike/risc-v bsp tests. Any ideas? Exception in

Re: [RSB PATCH] 6/rtems-gcc: Revert to the gcc-13 release branch for MacOS fixes

2024-04-13 Thread Joel Sherrill
This is ok to push. Unfortunate but this is the reality. A GCC 14 release is still future tense. On Sat, Apr 13, 2024, 8:49 PM wrote: > From: Chris Johns > > Change back to gcc-13 branch and a git version as gcc-13.2 does > not build on MacOS 14.4. The fixes are on the gcc-13 release branch. >

Re: [PATCH] score: Improve C/C++ standard compatibility

2024-04-09 Thread Joel Sherrill
This looks ok. On Tue, Apr 9, 2024, 7:30 AM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > The processor mask implementation uses flsl() from which is > only BSD visible. Move the implementation to a separate header file to > hide it from the API level. This fixes build errors

Re: GCC 14: Some warnings are now errors

2024-04-09 Thread Joel Sherrill
Is 14 the version for RTEMS 7 tools? If so, that makes it easier to address the issues. And Chris says we need 13 for RTEMS 6 because older doesn't compile on new Mac tools. So that needs action. On Tue, Apr 9, 2024, 8:29 AM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > Hello, >

Re: [RSB PATCH] sb: Add sb-rtems-pkg to update the RTEMS package hashes and checksums

2024-04-03 Thread Joel Sherrill
for > readability. > > Kinsey > > On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 11:29 AM Joel Sherrill > wrote: > >> This looks handy. I don't have an issue with it. >> >> On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 11:25 PM wrote: >> >>> From: Chris Johns >>> >>>

Re: [RSB PATCH] sb: Add sb-rtems-pkg to update the RTEMS package hashes and checksums

2024-04-03 Thread Joel Sherrill
This looks handy. I don't have an issue with it. On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 11:25 PM wrote: > From: Chris Johns > > --- > source-builder/sb-rtems-pkg | 29 > source-builder/sb/download.py | 5 +- > source-builder/sb/git.py | 12 ++ > source-builder/sb/rtemspkg.py | 279

Re: [RSB PATCH] rtems: Update RTEMS packages to their HEAD

2024-04-03 Thread Joel Sherrill
Looks good. I will push. On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 11:23 PM wrote: > From: Chris Johns > > --- > rtems/config/tools/rtems-kernel-6.cfg | 4 ++-- > rtems/config/tools/rtems-libbsd-6.cfg | 4 ++-- > rtems/config/tools/rtems-tools-6.cfg | 6 +++--- > 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

Re: Finished Hello World Example

2024-04-02 Thread Joel Sherrill
This patch looks ok. We also need a screenshot of it running. I hope you made the deadline of applying via the Google site. We track proposals at https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/GSoC/2024 On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 2:47 PM SEAN TANG wrote: > > ___ > devel m

Re: Clarification Regarding Initial Project Scope for "Add BSP for Polarfire based Beagle"

2024-04-02 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Tue, Apr 2, 2024, 9:28 AM Purva Yeshi wrote: > Hello, > > I'm reaching out to seek clarification regarding the initial scope of the > "Add BSP for Polarfire based Beagle" project that I've applied for. > > As outlined in the project description, the primary aim is to create a BSP > for the Bea

Re: PowerPC e7400 executable is type powerpc:e500 making debug difficult

2024-03-30 Thread Joel Sherrill
it also makes sense to have a way to avoid it. > It also leads to dead/unused code in any deployment whose BSP uses this file Feel free to submit a patch > > > On Mar 29, 2024, at 2:05 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > > Hi > > > > Chris and I discussed this for

Re: approve google docs editing request

2024-03-30 Thread Joel Sherrill
You do not edit the master proposal template. You make a copy of it and turn it into your proposal. --joel On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 12:29 AM ashish ashish wrote: > I requested on google docs for editing to write my proposal. and it needs > approval. > please approve it. > request with email: ash

Re: PowerPC e7400 executable is type powerpc:e500 making debug difficult

2024-03-29 Thread Joel Sherrill
Hi Chris and I discussed this for a few minutes last night and wondered if code like this which includes arbitrary CPU model specific code could be the culprit? https://git.rtems.org/rtems/tree/bsps/powerpc/shared/exceptions/ppc_exc_initialize.c#n65 There may be other sections that do this. If

Re: [PATCH 0/1] x86_64: Fix stack aligment for x86-64 SysV ABI

2024-03-23 Thread Joel Sherrill
This is a great explanation. Would you mind filing a ticket with this explanatino and referencing the ticket in the commit message of the patch? When someone wonders about the change in the future, the ticket explanation will be useful On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 9:24 PM Matheus Pecoraro wrote: > I

Re: [Docs] c-user: Clarify CONFIGURE_TICKS_PER_TIMESLICE

2024-03-21 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 9:06 AM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > On 21.03.24 15:05, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > Isn't this content generated from rtems-central? > > Yes, it is generated. > > > > > Shouldn't there also be

Re: [Docs] c-user: Clarify CONFIGURE_TICKS_PER_TIMESLICE

2024-03-21 Thread Joel Sherrill
Isn't this content generated from rtems-central? Shouldn't there also be a change there? --joel On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 9:24 AM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > Close #4986. > --- > c-user/config/general.rst | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

gprof Support

2024-03-20 Thread Joel Sherrill
Hi Did gprof support some along as a side-effect of gcov support? Any hints on getting it working appreciated. --joel ___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [PATCH] Do not define CONFIGURE_TICKS_PER_TIMESLICE to 0

2024-03-20 Thread Joel Sherrill
This is generally ok but it contradicts the documented behavior for CONFIGURE_TICKS_PER_TIMESLICE which states "The value of the configuration option shall be greater than or equal to zero." If zero is to be an error, then that needs to change. Further, this series of changes has made me realize

Re: [PATCH] improved error checking in ticks per timeslice

2024-03-18 Thread Joel Sherrill
No. Just a lesson to remember -- Everyone along the path should have built rtems with all tests enabled. This is something that should never happen after the upcoming transition to GitLab. It definitely shows we need to build at least one BSP with tests enabled. On Mon, Mar 18, 2024, 7:45 PM zac

Re: utf32 support

2024-03-18 Thread Joel Sherrill
What does support for UTF-32 entail? Do you have an idea what software functions you are looking for? I see the International Components for Unicode (ICU) has a converter ( https://icu.unicode.org/download) which looks it might be part of a solution. Multibyte character methods defined by POSIX w

RTEMS 7 GDB Build Failure on FreeBSD 13

2024-03-18 Thread Joel Sherrill
Hi I am going through the logs on the test sweep VMs to see why some builds are failing. This is due to gdb's requirement for GMP and MPFR. What's the recommended way to address this? Load native packages? checking for the correct version of gmp.h... yes checking for the correct version of mpfr.h

Re: [PATCH rtems-tools] rtems-score-thread.ini: Remove _Thread_Close so trace examples link

2024-03-14 Thread Joel Sherrill
Thanks. All pushed now. On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 6:46 PM Chris Johns wrote: > OK > > Thanks > Chris > > On 12/3/2024 1:06 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > _Thread_Close no longer exists. There are multiple exapmles which > > show tracing in rtems-examples

[PATCH rtems-source-builder 2/2] rtems-gcc-*-newlib-head.cfg: Bump hash for newlib

2024-03-13 Thread Joel Sherrill
This was driven by the increase in fdset size from 64 to 256 files. --- rtems/config/tools/rtems-gcc-10-newlib-head.cfg | 4 ++-- rtems/config/tools/rtems-gcc-10.4-newlib-head.cfg | 4 ++-- rtems/config/tools/rtems-gcc-12-newlib-head.cfg | 4 ++-- rtems/config/tools/rtems-gcc-13-newlib-head.cf

[PATCH rtems-source-builder 1/2] rtems-tools-6.cfg: Bump hash to account for 5 months of changes

2024-03-13 Thread Joel Sherrill
In particular, the BSP set definitions for rtems-bsp-builder were out of sync with RTEMS and caused unnecessary failures reported to the build@ mailing list. --- rtems/config/tools/rtems-tools-6.cfg | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/rtems/config/tools/rtems-to

Re: Multiple PowerPC BSPs Fail to BUIld

2024-03-12 Thread Joel Sherrill
FWIW I am still waiting for an ACK on the fdset size increase patch to newlib. Once that's in place, I will bump the rtems-tools hash and newlib hash. --joel On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 10:16 PM Chris Johns wrote: > On 11/3/2024 6:04 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > sorry for breaking the build. I fi

Re: arm/tms570ls3137_hdk_with_loader build failures

2024-03-11 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 12:14 AM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > On 09.03.24 22:39, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > Hi > > > > The build sweep using rtems-bsp-builder reports that 8 build > > configurations of arm/tms570ls3137_hdk_with_l

[PATCH rtems-tools] rtems-score-thread.ini: Remove _Thread_Close so trace examples link

2024-03-11 Thread Joel Sherrill
_Thread_Close no longer exists. There are multiple exapmles which show tracing in rtems-examples which fail to link due to this. --- linkers/rtems-score-thread.ini | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/linkers/rtems-score-thread.ini b/linkers/rtems-score-thread.i

Multiple PowerPC BSPs Fail to BUIld

2024-03-09 Thread Joel Sherrill
Hi In looking at the build sweep log, I see what looks like motorola_powerpc and beatnik all have a common build failure that results in 53 configurations failing per https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/build/2024-March/051698.html This is one but there are a lot. debug powerpc/mvme2307 build:

arm/tms570ls3137_hdk_with_loader build failures

2024-03-09 Thread Joel Sherrill
Hi The build sweep using rtems-bsp-builder reports that 8 build configurations of arm/tms570ls3137_hdk_with_loader fail. See the following for more details. https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/build/2024-March/051698.html The first reported configuration is: 1 debug arm/tms570ls3137_hdk_with_load

Fwd: Coverity Scan: Analysis completed for RTEMS

2024-03-05 Thread Joel Sherrill
-- Forwarded message - From: Date: Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 7:49 PM Subject: Coverity Scan: Analysis completed for RTEMS To: Your request for analysis of RTEMS has been completed successfully. The results are available at https://u15810271.ct.sendgrid.net/ls/click?upn=u001.A

Fwd: Coverity Scan: Analysis completed for RTEMS-Newlib

2024-03-05 Thread Joel Sherrill
-- Forwarded message - From: Date: Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 7:51 PM Subject: Coverity Scan: Analysis completed for RTEMS-Newlib To: Your request for analysis of RTEMS-Newlib has been completed successfully. The results are available at https://u15810271.ct.sendgrid.net/ls/cl

Fwd: Coverity Scan: Analysis completed for RTEMS-Tools

2024-03-05 Thread Joel Sherrill
-- Forwarded message - From: Date: Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 5:56 PM Subject: Coverity Scan: Analysis completed for RTEMS-Tools To: Your request for analysis of RTEMS-Tools has been completed successfully. The results are available at https://u15810271.ct.sendgrid.net/ls/clic

Coverity Scan Runs Renabled

2024-03-05 Thread Joel Sherrill
Hi Coverity required an update of their client tool to keep doing scans. The new client tool was based on a libc library version which was newer than what was on the machine running the scans. This required setting this up again on another computer with a newer OS. I am forwarding three Coverity

Re: [PATCH 2/2] testsuites/dhrystone: Initialize before use

2024-03-01 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 8:21 AM Kinsey Moore wrote: > A very similar change was made in 2017 to resolve the same warning for a > different variable. The only real difference is that it is wrapped in > __rtems__ ifdefs. I can move this change to the #ifdef'd section if that's > preferable. > Do no

6.1rc2 on Rocky 9

2024-02-29 Thread Joel Sherrill
Hi Looks pretty good overall. This appears to be the only issue: Testing: riscv rv64imac_spike BSP to Build: rv64imac 'distclean' finished successfully (0.011s) Regenerate build specification cache (needs a couple of seconds)... real 0m25.545s user 2m30.639s sys 0m29.614s *** /home/joel/rtems-6.

6.1rc2 Tool Build Failures

2024-02-23 Thread Joel Sherrill
Hi rtems 6.1rc2 has a lot of tool build failures because I didn't have gmp-devel installed. hecking for gmp.h... no configure: error: gmp.h header not found This is reported as part of building gcc-newlib. Should the RSB account for this by building gmp at the same time? For now, I installed a

Re: Documentation theme update

2024-02-21 Thread Joel Sherrill
Based on Christian saying it works and me confirming that, I pushed this. Thanks a lot Chris! --joel On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 2:22 AM Christian MAUDERER < christian.maude...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > Hello Chris, > > On 2024-02-21 06:16, Chris Johns wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have a patch for

Re: [PATCH] testsuites/dl11: Test TLS on a secondary thread

2024-02-18 Thread Joel Sherrill
I think this is ok also. On Sun, Feb 18, 2024, 10:20 PM Chris Johns wrote: > Looks good. Thanks > > Chris > > On 19/2/2024 3:16 pm, Kinsey Moore wrote: > > This adds a pthread that runs the test as well to increase test > > coverage. The original test would have passed if all threads returned >

Re: [PATCH] improved error checking in ticks per timeslice

2024-02-17 Thread Joel Sherrill
ou on what to edit for this and how to propagate it dull. > > > On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 at 09:28, Sebastian Huber < > sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > >> >> >> On 14.02.24 15:18, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> > I'm cc'ing Sebastian b

Re: [PATCH rtems-source-builder 2/2] devel/qemu-xilinx: Fix build on GCC 13.2.0

2024-02-16 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 1:37 PM Kinsey Moore wrote: > On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 9:14 AM Sam Price wrote: > >> I was wondering if you had any notes on your process of working with >> qemu in the rtems builder. >> I imagine you have your own xilinx qemu forked to work on, and then >> take the patche

Re: RSB checksum updates for RTEMS 6

2024-02-16 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Fri, Feb 16, 2024, 12:56 AM Chris Johns wrote: > Hi, > > I have opened https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/4991 to track checksum > errors in > some of the sources being downloaded by the RSB such as: > > error: checksum failure file: > patches/Make-lang.in-b09fb02bb4c0d16fc2c842bec4069c033897b5f2.

Re: [PATCH] improved error checking in ticks per timeslice

2024-02-14 Thread Joel Sherrill
I'm cc'ing Sebastian because you edited the text in a generated file. He should be able to point us to the right place to fix it. On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 8:26 PM wrote: > From: Zack leung > > diff --git a/cpukit/doxygen/appl-config.h b/cpukit/doxygen/appl-config.h > index bd7cde628f..d480eb3971

Apparently Unused ARM Linker Symbol

2024-02-13 Thread Joel Sherrill
Hi In looking at linkcmds code, one of the folks in the class noticed this symbol which appears to be unused. This is a grep from the top of the tree. It appears that bsp_stack_main_size is defined but never really used. If someone can confirm this, it needs to be purged. [joel@localhost rtems]$

Wrong BSP Names in arm spec files

2024-02-13 Thread Joel Sherrill
Hi While teaching a class this week, I noticed that some arm optcachedata.yml files appear to reference BSP variants that are not associated with the BSP whose directory the yml file is located in. These greps show the issue: [joel@localhost arm]$ grep lm3s6965_qemu */optcachedat* imx/optcachedat

Incorrect Rendering in Rate Monotonic Manager Chapter

2024-02-09 Thread Joel Sherrill
Hi https://docs.rtems.org/branches/master/c-user/rate-monotonic/background.html#schedulability-analysis has a bullet list which does not have bullets. But they are there in the PDF version: https://docs.rtems.org/branches/master/c-user.pdf Is there something wrong with the markup? Is something b

Re: [PATCH] cpukit/jffs2: Handle used empty file system

2024-02-02 Thread Joel Sherrill
Ignoring any specific technical comments from others. (1) Should this have a ticket? Seems impactful and odd enough to since that shows up in release notes. (2) Should it also be applied to 5.x with a separate ticket? --joel On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 4:40 PM Kinsey Moore wrote: > On JFFS2 file s

Re: Naming convention for Rust target platforms

2024-01-31 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 12:31 AM Karel Gardas wrote: > On 1/30/24 18:13, Frank Kühndel wrote: > > Which name Rust accepts instead of "armv7a-rtems6-eabihf" depends on the > > naming convention of the Rust community: > > https://docs.rust-embedded.org/embedonomicon/custom-target.html > > Acco

Re: Naming convention for Rust target platforms

2024-01-30 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 3:15 PM Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 11:13 AM Frank Kühndel < > frank.kuehn...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > >> Hello Jan, >> >> On 1/29/24 19:41, jan.som...@dlr.de wrote: >> > Hi everyone, >> >

Re: Naming convention for Rust target platforms

2024-01-30 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 11:13 AM Frank Kühndel < frank.kuehn...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > Hello Jan, > > On 1/29/24 19:41, jan.som...@dlr.de wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > As mentioned in the other Rust thread, I am working on an initial Rust > port for RTEMS. > > The target platform for testi

Fwd: [rtems-bsp-builder] 2024-01-20 06:26:20: Profile(s): everything

2024-01-20 Thread Joel Sherrill
Looksike some of the rece t activities around the tms750 BSP have not been fully accounted for. Remember that if the set of BSPs has changed, the tiers definition files in rtems-tools need to be updated -- Forwarded message - From: OAR Tester for Ubuntu 22.04 Date: Sat, Jan 20, 2

Fwd: [RTEMS Project] #45: shsim does not build

2024-01-15 Thread Joel Sherrill
---+- Reporter: Joel Sherrill | Owner: Ralf Corsepius Type: defect | Status: closed Priority: normal | Milestone: 2 Component: bsps | Version: unknown Severity: major | Resolution: fixed Keywords

Fwd: [RTEMS Project] #60: GNATS: Additional state

2024-01-15 Thread Joel Sherrill
Looks like one of the commits has the wrong ticket number. And this ticket should be closed anyway. We haven't used GNATS in a long time. -- Forwarded message - From: RTEMS trac Date: Mon, Jan 15, 2024, 3:37 AM Subject: Re: [RTEMS Project] #60: GNATS: Additional state To: Cc:

RTEMS 6.1-rc1 RSB URL Issue

2024-01-11 Thread Joel Sherrill
Hi I was trying to test rc1 and all of the tool builds fail like this: == script: 86: source_dir_rtems_tools=${rtems_tools_source} source setup: rtems-tools-6.1-rc1-1: source rtems-tools -q -n ${rtems_tools_source} making dir: /home/joel/rtems-6.1rc1/rt

Re: CentOS 8 - no python

2024-01-09 Thread Joel Sherrill
Chris.. an RSB feature submission question at the bottom. Rest inlined. On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 9:30 AM Michael G. South wrote: > > > On Jan 8, 2024, at 10:53 , Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 10:13 AM Frank Kühndel < > f

Re: CentOS 8 - no python

2024-01-08 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 10:13 AM Frank Kühndel < frank.kuehn...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > Hi Joel, > > have a great 2024! > > On 12/24/23 22:16, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > Hi > > > > Trying to bring up Coverity builds on a Centos 8 machine, I ran into &

Re: Pause on console in libmisc/shell detecting terminal size (mvme5500, beatnik)

2024-01-04 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Thu, Jan 4, 2024, 5:47 PM zhengxiaojun <17935...@qq.com> wrote: > > > 在 2024/1/5 4:25, Peter Dufault 写道: > > I guess maybe the list went down for a while. I sent this on 12-30, and > just got a bounce message today and no "devel" mail until today. > > > > On master when I type a shell command

Re: [PATCH] cpukit/dosfs: Cast away ignored return

2024-01-04 Thread Joel Sherrill
Don't we put a space after the (void)? On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 12:55 PM Kinsey Moore wrote: > An error is already being reported. Checking the return value of this > function is not useful. > --- > cpukit/libfs/src/dosfs/msdos_file.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > di

Re: [PATCH rtems6 - v1 05/16] FIX: Add missing default case

2024-01-04 Thread Joel Sherrill
https://docs.rtems.org/branches/master/eng/vc-users.html#commit-message-guidance If that is missing something, please ask questions and we can address the Software Engineering Guide. --joel On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 2:24 PM Bernd Moessner wrote: > Dear Kinsey, > > sry for the stupid question. Wha

Re: [PATCH rtems6 - v1 05/16] FIX: Add missing default case

2024-01-04 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 12:49 PM Kinsey Moore wrote: > All of the patches here need an issue reference. Beyond that, this patch > is good to go in. I'm still reviewing the remainder of the set and I'll > leave the renaming discussion to Aaron. > I have only gotten this far into the patch set but

Re: [PATCH rtems6 - v1 04/16] Flashdev: Align IOCTL and shell function names

2024-01-04 Thread Joel Sherrill
This looks ok to me. Just more name realignment which shouldn't impact much. On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 12:34 PM wrote: > From: Bernd Moessner > > --- > cpukit/libmisc/shell/main_flashdev.c | 36 ++-- > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/cpuk

Re: [PATCH rtems6 - v1 03/16] Flashdev: Align IOCTL function and macro names

2024-01-04 Thread Joel Sherrill
This looks ok to me. Similar naming change. On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 12:34 PM wrote: > From: Bernd Moessner > > --- > cpukit/dev/flash/flashdev.c | 72 +-- > cpukit/include/dev/flash/flashdev.h | 12 ++-- > .../libtests/flashdev01/test_flashdev.c

Re: [PATCH rtems6 - v1 01/16] FIX: Add missing C++ include guards

2024-01-04 Thread Joel Sherrill
This looks ok to me. On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 12:34 PM wrote: > From: Bernd Moessner > > --- > cpukit/include/dev/flash/flashdev.h | 9 + > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/cpukit/include/dev/flash/flashdev.h > b/cpukit/include/dev/flash/flashdev.h > index d1dc08a5c4..675

Re: [PATCH rtems6 - v1 02/16] Flashdev: Unify IOCTL macro names

2024-01-04 Thread Joel Sherrill
I'm ok with this. I like the subject/verb/direct object naming of the ioctls. --joel On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 12:34 PM wrote: > From: Bernd Moessner > > --- > cpukit/dev/flash/flashdev.c | 16 > cpukit/include/dev/flash/flashdev.h | 16 > cpukit/lib

CentOS 8 - no python

2023-12-24 Thread Joel Sherrill
Hi Trying to bring up Coverity builds on a Centos 8 machine, I ran into this: + ../source-builder/sb-set-builder --log=l-sparc.txt --prefix=/home/joel/rtems-cron-coverity/tools/6 --mail --mail-to= bu...@rtems.org --mail-from=j...@rtems.org 6/rtems-sparc /usr/bin/env: ‘python’: No such file or di

Fwd: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for RTEMS-Tools

2023-12-24 Thread Joel Sherrill
Any suggestions on how to address these? -- Forwarded message - From: Date: Sun, Dec 24, 2023, 1:18 PM Subject: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for RTEMS-Tools To: Hi, Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to RTEMS-Tools found with Coverity Scan. 39

Re: [rtems-docs PATCH] sphinx/style: Fix building with the latest sphinx

2023-12-21 Thread Joel Sherrill
It is working for me on Rocky 9 with Sphinx 7.2.6 and a Texlive from this summer. The missing step was removing the older Sphinx version. Then I had to also install PlantUML npm. --joel On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 3:45 PM Chris Johns wrote: > On 20/12/2023 8:12 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: &g

Re: [rtems-docs commit] sphinx/style: Fix building with the latest sphinx

2023-12-19 Thread Joel Sherrill
It didn't work on the CentOS 7 system because Chris pushed while I was switching VMs. I now get the same output on CentOS 7 as on Rocky 9. It has sphinx-build 5.3.0 --joel On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 3:10 PM Chris Johns wrote: > Module:rtems-docs > Branch:master > Commit:e31a0b22fe43e0

Re: [rtems-docs PATCH] sphinx/style: Fix building with the latest sphinx

2023-12-19 Thread Joel Sherrill
I tried the patch on Rocky 9 with Python 3.9.14 and sphinx-build 5.3.0 from a pip local install. (rtemsdocs) [joel@localhost rtems-docs]$ ./waf distclean Waf: The wscript in '/home/joel/rtems-work/rtems-docs' is unreadable Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/joel/rtems-work/rtems-doc

Re: [PATCH] glossary: Add terms

2023-11-28 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 10:27 AM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > --- > c-user/glossary.rst | 50 +++ > eng/fv/approaches.rst | 2 +- > eng/fv/overview.rst | 6 +++--- > eng/glossary.rst | 26 +- >

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >