On 11/11/2015 6:45 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>
> I already use Binutils 2.25.
>
I think Joel has this working. I hope he will answer when he turns up.
>
> Does this break 4.11?
>
There is a 4.11 branch.
Chris
___
devel mailing list
On 11/11/15 14:54, Joel Sherrill wrote:
On Nov 10, 2015 6:56 AM, "Sebastian Huber"
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 08/11/15 01:05, Chris Johns wrote:
>>
>> Are there any architecture regressions with gcc-6?
>
>
> m32c,
On 08/11/15 01:05, Chris Johns wrote:
Are there any architecture regressions with gcc-6?
m32c, moxie, v850 don't work with GCC 6.
epiphany and or1k still use non-FSF GCC.
What archs have to actually run?
arm, powerpc, sparc.
I am happy to move to gcc-6 for archs we know are working.
On 10/11/2015 11:56 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>
>
> On 08/11/15 01:05, Chris Johns wrote:
>> Are there any architecture regressions with gcc-6?
>
> m32c, moxie, v850 don't work with GCC 6.
I thought moxie was building with a new binutils.
>
> epiphany and or1k still use non-FSF GCC.
>
---
rtems/config/4.12/rtems-all.bset | 17
rtems/config/4.12/rtems-arm.bset | 4 ++
rtems/config/4.12/rtems-autotools-base.bset| 23 +++
rtems/config/4.12/rtems-autotools-internal.bset| 13 ++
I think Chris may want to change the way RSB deals with versions, so
hold off on committing until he can comment. I assume this is just cp
from 4.11 to 4.12 plus search-replace?
On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Sebastian Huber
wrote:
> ---
>