Re: [PATCH] Fix declaration of pthread-structs in s-osinte-rtems.ads (ada/68169)

2015-12-02 Thread Jan Sommer
Am Wednesday 02 December 2015, 08:13:20 schrieb Joel Sherrill: > > On December 2, 2015 2:14:22 AM EST, Jeff Law wrote: > >On 12/01/2015 12:56 PM, Jan Sommer wrote: > >> Am Monday 30 November 2015, 16:19:30 schrieb Jeff Law: > >>> On 11/30/2015 03:06 PM, Jan Sommer wrote: >

Re: [PATCH] Fix declaration of pthread-structs in s-osinte-rtems.ads (ada/68169)

2015-12-01 Thread Jan Sommer
Am Monday 30 November 2015, 16:19:30 schrieb Jeff Law: > On 11/30/2015 03:06 PM, Jan Sommer wrote: > > Could someone with write access please commit the patch? > > The paperwork with the FSF has gone through. If something else is missing, > > please tell me. > > I won't be available next week. >

Re: [PATCH] Fix declaration of pthread-structs in s-osinte-rtems.ads (ada/68169)

2015-11-30 Thread Jan Sommer
Could someone with write access please commit the patch? The paperwork with the FSF has gone through. If something else is missing, please tell me. I won't be available next week. Best regards, Jan Am Tuesday 24 November 2015, 08:47:49 schrieb Jan Sommer: > It has gone through. > That was

[PATCH] Fix declaration of pthread-structs in s-osinte-rtems.ads (ada/68169)

2015-11-23 Thread Jan Sommer
Just noticed that I forgot to crosspost this mail to the rtems-devel list. If someone with commit rights could check and push the patches we might get it into the next release. Cheers, Jan--- Begin Message --- Hello, The paperwork seems to have gone through. Here is the patch again for the

Re: [PATCH] Fix declaration of pthread-structs in s-osinte-rtems.ads (ada/68169)

2015-11-23 Thread Sebastian Huber
Hello Jan, On 23/11/15 23:15, Jan Sommer wrote: If someone with commit rights could check and push the patches we might get it into the next release. what is the status of your copyright assignment to the FSF which is required to integrate changes into GCC? -- Sebastian Huber, embedded

Re: [PATCH] Fix declaration of pthread-structs in s-osinte-rtems.ads (ada/68169)

2015-11-23 Thread Jan Sommer
It has gone through. That was why I resubmitted the patch. Joel can confirm. Apparently he is on a respective list and saw my paperwork being cleared. Best regards, Jan Am Tuesday 24 November 2015, 07:45:30 schrieb Sebastian Huber: > Hello Jan, > > On 23/11/15 23:15, Jan Sommer wrote: > >

Re: [PATCH] Fix declaration of pthread-structs in s-osinte-rtems.ads

2015-11-04 Thread Jan Sommer
Am Tuesday 03 November 2015, 20:13:50 schrieb Arnaud Charlet: > > > Your ChangeLog entry is not in the proper format, see sections 6.8.1 and > > > 6.8.2 from http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/standards.html > > > > > > The diff itself is OK. > > > > Ok, fixed this. See the new diff below. > >

Re: [PATCH] Fix declaration of pthread-structs in s-osinte-rtems.ads

2015-11-03 Thread Jan Sommer
Am Monday 02 November 2015, 12:39:57 schrieb Sebastian Huber: > > On 31/10/15 16:47, Jan Sommer wrote: > > Hi, > > > > This patch changes the Ada-declaration of the pthread-related structs such > > as pthread_attr_t from a field-equivalent declaration to just reserving the > > right amount of

Re: [PATCH] Fix declaration of pthread-structs in s-osinte-rtems.ads

2015-11-03 Thread Jan Sommer
Am Tuesday 03 November 2015, 18:10:53 schrieb Arnaud Charlet: > > Let's try again. This time I made the diff against trunk with the changes > > Sebastian recommended, included a ChangeLog and used svn-diff. > > If this patch goes through, please let me know how the backporting works. > > Your

[PATCH] Fix declaration of pthread-structs in s-osinte-rtems.ads

2015-11-03 Thread Jan Sommer
Hi, Let's try again. This time I made the diff against trunk with the changes Sebastian recommended, included a ChangeLog and used svn-diff. If this patch goes through, please let me know how the backporting works. Best regards, Jan Index: ChangeLog

Re: [PATCH] Fix declaration of pthread-structs in s-osinte-rtems.ads

2015-11-02 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 31/10/15 16:47, Jan Sommer wrote: Hi, This patch changes the Ada-declaration of the pthread-related structs such as pthread_attr_t from a field-equivalent declaration to just reserving the right amount of memory. It is only rtems related and essentially copies the way how the types are

Re: [PATCH] Fix declaration of pthread-structs in s-osinte-rtems.ads

2015-10-31 Thread Jan Sommer
Am Saturday 31 October 2015, 16:47:35 schrieb Jan Sommer: > Hi, > > This patch changes the Ada-declaration of the pthread-related structs such as > pthread_attr_t from a field-equivalent declaration to just reserving the > right amount of memory. > It is only rtems related and essentially

[PATCH] Fix declaration of pthread-structs in s-osinte-rtems.ads

2015-10-31 Thread Jan Sommer
Hi, This patch changes the Ada-declaration of the pthread-related structs such as pthread_attr_t from a field-equivalent declaration to just reserving the right amount of memory. It is only rtems related and essentially copies the way how the types are defined in s-osinte-linux.ads. It makes