Hello Prashanth,
Am 08.08.22 um 15:49 schrieb Prashanth S:
Hi Christian,
We have Chris Johns and Christian Mauderer on the list. In this case
Chris has sent the mail. To avoid confusion, I never use a short form of
my name on the list. But it's easy to mix up so don't worry about it.
Hi Christian,
Oops, I apologize. I think I used gmail style quotes that might have added
html.
I will not use it.
Regards
Prashanth S
On Mon, 8 Aug 2022 at 05:31, Chris Johns wrote:
> Hi
>
> Could you please configure your email client to not send HTML emails to
> the list?
>
> I am reluctant
Hi
Could you please configure your email client to not send HTML emails to the
list?
I am reluctant to enable filtering in mailman and have managed to avoid it so
far.
Thanks
Chris
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
Hi Christian,
general note: You add an API to cpukit. Most APIs there should have a
> test case in the testsuite. In this case the test case would have to
> create some dummy CAN driver and check whether everything works like
> expected. As an example take a look at the SPI test:
>
>
Hello Duc,
general note: You add an API to cpukit. Most APIs there should have a
test case in the testsuite. In this case the test case would have to
create some dummy CAN driver and check whether everything works like
expected. As an example take a look at the SPI test:
Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] bsps/stm32f4 Include STM32F4 HAL
> (o...@c-mauderer.de)
>3. [PATCH] cpukit/dev/can: Added CAN support (Prashanth S)
>
>
> --
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2022 21:41:19 +02
---
cpukit/dev/can/can.c | 514 +
cpukit/include/dev/can/can-msg.h | 55 +++
cpukit/include/dev/can/can-queue.h | 127 +++
cpukit/include/dev/can/can.h | 102 ++
spec/build/cpukit/librtemscpu.yml | 6 +
5 files changed, 804
Hello Prashanth,
Am 19.07.22 um 15:09 schrieb Prashanth S:
Hi Christian,
This is to reply to review comments.
first question: You also worked on a driver for beagle DCAN. Did you
already adapt that driver to this API? If yes, it would be usefull to
post that as a patch too so that the
Hi Christian,
This is to reply to review comments.
> first question: You also worked on a driver for beagle DCAN. Did you
> already adapt that driver to this API? If yes, it would be usefull to
> post that as a patch too so that the direction and the method how it
> will be used is more clear.
Hello Prashanth,
first question: You also worked on a driver for beagle DCAN. Did you
already adapt that driver to this API? If yes, it would be usefull to
post that as a patch too so that the direction and the method how it
will be used is more clear.
Note that some of my comments might
---
cpukit/dev/can/can-queue.c| 112 +++
cpukit/dev/can/can.c | 480 ++
cpukit/include/dev/can/can.h | 115 +++
spec/build/cpukit/librtemscpu.yml | 5 +
4 files changed, 712 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
11 matches
Mail list logo
