RE: [PATCH] rtems-examples: Add CoreMark Benchmark

2021-05-04 Thread BAILLIEZ Damien
Hesham* Sorry for the typo ! -Message d'origine- De : BAILLIEZ Damien Envoyé : mardi 4 mai 2021 10:16 À : 'Hesham Almatary' Cc : devel@rtems.org Objet : RE: [PATCH] rtems-examples: Add CoreMark Benchmark Hello Heshman, Yes I only use Make. -Message d'origine- De : H.M.K

RE: [PATCH] rtems-examples: Add CoreMark Benchmark

2021-05-04 Thread BAILLIEZ Damien
Hello Heshman, Yes I only use Make. -Message d'origine- De : H.M.K. Almatary De la part de Hesham Almatary Envoyé : vendredi 30 avril 2021 19:39 À : BAILLIEZ Damien Cc : devel@rtems.org Objet : Re: [PATCH] rtems-examples: Add CoreMark Benchmark Hello Damien, Glad to know you have

Re: [PATCH] rtems-examples: Add CoreMark Benchmark

2021-04-30 Thread Hesham Almatary
Hello Damien, Glad to know you have an interest in it. Yes, we needed to add Make support for it, I just didn't get to work on that yet. Do you need to exclusively use Make and not waf though? On Fri, 30 Apr 2021 at 16:50, BAILLIEZ Damien wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I’ve seen in the Archives

Re: [PATCH] rtems-examples: Add CoreMark Benchmark

2021-04-30 Thread BAILLIEZ Damien
Hi all, I've seen in the Archives that the discussion about adding the CoreMark Benchmark ended a few weeks ago on the subject of Make support, which greatly interests me. Does someone involved with this know if there has been any progress ? Regards, Damien

Re: [PATCH] rtems-examples: Add CoreMark Benchmark

2021-03-15 Thread Gedare Bloom
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 6:02 AM Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > > On Mon, Mar 15, 2021, 5:53 AM Hesham Almatary > wrote: >> >> Hello Gedare, >> >> Yeah adding Make support should be straightforward. I just assumed >> Make will be deprecated soon based on [1] and haven't bothered >> supporting it. >>

Re: [PATCH] rtems-examples: Add CoreMark Benchmark

2021-03-15 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021, 5:53 AM Hesham Almatary wrote: > Hello Gedare, > > Yeah adding Make support should be straightforward. I just assumed > Make will be deprecated soon based on [1] and haven't bothered > supporting it. > > [1] >

Re: [PATCH] rtems-examples: Add CoreMark Benchmark

2021-03-15 Thread Hesham Almatary
Hello Gedare, Yeah adding Make support should be straightforward. I just assumed Make will be deprecated soon based on [1] and haven't bothered supporting it. [1] https://github.com/RTEMS/rtems-examples/blob/983926a7e519be85f630c620430e7e1ac3e0f4ea/README.Makefile#L32 On Sun, 14 Mar 2021 at

Re: [PATCH] rtems-examples: Add CoreMark Benchmark

2021-03-14 Thread Hesham Almatary
On Sat, 13 Mar 2021 at 23:38, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > I don't see any RTEMS specific instructions added. Especially > since I think you need them to deal with the submodule. > I relied on the existing README.waf which gives instructions to init and update submodules (including rtems-waf itself

Re: [PATCH] rtems-examples: Add CoreMark Benchmark

2021-03-14 Thread Gedare Bloom
Hi Hesham, Nice work getting this integrated in the upstream. I guess that the git submodule instructions for building with waf will work for this, but not Make. How hard would it be for you to integrate the submodule with Make? This is fine with me as-is, I just want to know if we can keep it

Re: [PATCH] rtems-examples: Add CoreMark Benchmark

2021-03-14 Thread Joel Sherrill
I don't see any RTEMS specific instructions added. Especially since I think you need them to deal with the submodule. What happens when you haven't dealt with the submodule? Is the error reasonable? I would think a directory is missing and the waf build will die. I am thrilled to see these

[PATCH] rtems-examples: Add CoreMark Benchmark

2021-03-12 Thread Hesham Almatary
CoreMark's primary goals are simplicity and providing a method for testing only a processor's core features. It is used primarily here as a performance benchmark. Built and tested for RISC-V rv64imafdc_medany on QEMU and HW --- .gitmodules | 3 +++ benchmarks/coremark/coremark