On 22/07/2021 08:43, Chris Johns wrote:
On 22/7/21 5:08 am, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 21/07/2021 21:04, Gedare Bloom wrote:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 12:31 PM Sebastian Huber
wrote:
On 21/07/2021 20:28, Gedare Bloom wrote:
Why not throw an error here instead? In production, you wouldn't
On 22/7/21 5:08 am, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 21/07/2021 21:04, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 12:31 PM Sebastian Huber
>> wrote:
>>> On 21/07/2021 20:28, Gedare Bloom wrote:
Why not throw an error here instead? In production, you wouldn't want
this code...
>>> The
On 21/07/2021 21:04, Gedare Bloom wrote:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 12:31 PM Sebastian Huber
wrote:
On 21/07/2021 20:28, Gedare Bloom wrote:
Why not throw an error here instead? In production, you wouldn't want
this code...
The main issue is the bad chip design. If we don't have this code, we
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 12:31 PM Sebastian Huber
wrote:
>
> On 21/07/2021 20:28, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> > Why not throw an error here instead? In production, you wouldn't want
> > this code...
>
> The main issue is the bad chip design. If we don't have this code, we
> can't test the extended
On 21/07/2021 20:28, Gedare Bloom wrote:
Why not throw an error here instead? In production, you wouldn't want
this code...
The main issue is the bad chip design. If we don't have this code, we
can't test the extended interrupts. In production, you want tested code.
+
On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 6:50 AM Sebastian Huber
wrote:
>
> Update #3269.
> ---
> bsps/sparc/leon3/start/eirq.c | 86 +++---
> bsps/sparc/shared/irq/irq-shared.c | 17 --
> 2 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git
Update #3269.
---
bsps/sparc/leon3/start/eirq.c | 86 +++---
bsps/sparc/shared/irq/irq-shared.c | 17 --
2 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bsps/sparc/leon3/start/eirq.c b/bsps/sparc/leon3/start/eirq.c
index d6373bf00a..4f5f910106
