Re: [PATCH rtems-libbsd 2/2] if_ffec: Allow PHY that is connected to other FFEC

2022-06-02 Thread Gedare Bloom
On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 1:35 AM Christian MAUDERER wrote: > > Am 01.06.22 um 14:50 schrieb Gedare Bloom: > > Should this be upstreamed? > > I don't think so. The solution is quite device specific and has some > restrictions like the right initialization order (like noted in the > commit

Re: [PATCH rtems-libbsd 2/2] if_ffec: Allow PHY that is connected to other FFEC

2022-06-02 Thread Christian MAUDERER
Am 01.06.22 um 14:50 schrieb Gedare Bloom: Should this be upstreamed? I don't think so. The solution is quite device specific and has some restrictions like the right initialization order (like noted in the commit description). I don't think that FreeBSD will accept it. I have seen some

Re: [PATCH rtems-libbsd 2/2] if_ffec: Allow PHY that is connected to other FFEC

2022-06-01 Thread Gedare Bloom
Should this be upstreamed? On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 6:22 AM Christian Mauderer wrote: > > The i.MX6UL (and some others from the i.MX family) have shared MDIO > lines for multiple FFECs. This patch allows to use the MDIO interface > from another Ethernet controller. > > Note that you have to make

[PATCH rtems-libbsd 2/2] if_ffec: Allow PHY that is connected to other FFEC

2022-05-23 Thread Christian Mauderer
The i.MX6UL (and some others from the i.MX family) have shared MDIO lines for multiple FFECs. This patch allows to use the MDIO interface from another Ethernet controller. Note that you have to make sure that the FFECs are initialized in the right order. Normally that can be done via FDT. ---