On 2/10/2015 8:33 am, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> Why do you think it is wrong?
Because the check is for 'arm' and the file is 'mips'.
Chris
>
> The background for this change is that we need an explicit one-to-one mapping
> of libbsd and original FreeBSD files.
>
> - Chris Johns
On 10/1/2015 2:38 PM, Chris Johns wrote:
On 2/10/2015 8:33 am, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Why do you think it is wrong?
Because the check is for 'arm' and the file is 'mips'.
If I recall correctly, the MIPS version is the most generic
version and it is used for architectures which don't have
On 10/1/2015 3:34 PM, Chris Johns wrote:
On 2/10/2015 9:15 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
On 10/1/2015 2:38 PM, Chris Johns wrote:
On 2/10/2015 8:33 am, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Why do you think it is wrong?
Because the check is for 'arm' and the file is 'mips'.
If I recall correctly, the
- Chris Johns schrieb:
> On 2/10/2015 8:33 am, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> > Why do you think it is wrong?
>
> Because the check is for 'arm' and the file is 'mips'.
The mips variant is generic (C code only). There is no functional change.
Before this change we simply
On 2/10/2015 9:15 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>
> On 10/1/2015 2:38 PM, Chris Johns wrote:
>> On 2/10/2015 8:33 am, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>> Why do you think it is wrong?
>>
>> Because the check is for 'arm' and the file is 'mips'.
>
> If I recall correctly, the MIPS version is the most
On 1/10/2015 2:56 am, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> diff --git a/wscript b/wscript
> index 673479f..88334e4 100644
> --- a/wscript
> +++ b/wscript
> @@ -1053,42 +1053,41 @@ def build(bld):
>'rtemsbsd/telnetd/pty.c',
>'rtemsbsd/telnetd/telnetd.c']
> if
Why do you think it is wrong?
The background for this change is that we need an explicit one-to-one mapping
of libbsd and original FreeBSD files.
- Chris Johns schrieb:
> On 1/10/2015 2:56 am, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> > diff --git a/wscript b/wscript
> > index