Re: GCC 8 PowerPC Argument Changes

https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2017-May/017824.html On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 1:24 PM, wrote: > I should be following the status of the SPE support but haven’t, it’s an > important platform for one of my clients. A little googling doesn’t make it > clear how well the

Re: GCC 8 PowerPC Argument Changes

I should be following the status of the SPE support but haven’t, it’s an important platform for one of my clients. A little googling doesn’t make it clear how well the support is moving in to GCC 8, I only found again that it would be a new target. Hopefully someone following GCC on the list

Re: GCC 8 PowerPC Argument Changes

On Feb 11, 2018 11:29 AM, "Peter Dufault" wrote: What’s the context where -mno-spe is used? The last time I followed this the SPE support in the powerpc target was to be discontinued and a powerpcspe target was to be introduced. It is in one of the PowerPC BSP family

Re: GCC 8 PowerPC Argument Changes

What’s the context where -mno-spe is used? The last time I followed this the SPE support in the powerpc target was to be discontinued and a powerpcspe target was to be introduced. > On Feb 9, 2018, at 16:17 , Joel Sherrill wrote: > > Hi > > I am using GCC 8 to test my

GCC 8 PowerPC Argument Changes

Hi I am using GCC 8 to test my bsp_specs changes. On the powerpc -mno-spe is gone. I don't know of a case where we have a BSP that checks if GCC supports an argument or not. I think we have just changed the custom file when we upgraded GCC. Any thoughts on the correct argument or better