> Once it's set, If I'm not rebuilding the toolset, I'd guess I go
> straight to steps 2.5, 2.6 in the quick-start guide?
I'm sorry, I should have been more specific...I meant 2.5 (Build a
BSP) and 2.6 (Test a BSP) from the RTEMS quick-start?
Thanks again!
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 7:21 PM Joel
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 11:55 AM Matthew Joyce wrote:
>
> Dr. Joel,
>
> Thanks! This made me re-read your discord workflow advice from last
> week, and it brings me to another question...You wrote:
>
> "You don't have to rebuild the entire toolsuite at this point. Just
> add a functional test for
Dr. Joel,
Thanks! This made me re-read your discord workflow advice from last
week, and it brings me to another question...You wrote:
"You don't have to rebuild the entire toolsuite at this point. Just
add a functional test for sig2str.c to the testsuite (e.g. psxsigNN or
similar based on
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 8:07 AM Matthew Joyce wrote:
>
> Dear Mentors,
>
> I've implemented my new functions locally in Newlib, created basic
> tests in RTEMS, now I want to add the patches to the RSB to test them.
>
> I think I understand that once I submit these patches to newlib, they
> should
Dear Mentors,
I've implemented my new functions locally in Newlib, created basic
tests in RTEMS, now I want to add the patches to the RSB to test them.
I think I understand that once I submit these patches to newlib, they
should only include the added lines of source code...not any changes
