On 2023-01-26 10:26, Christian MAUDERER wrote:
On 2023-01-25 19:10, Peter Dufault wrote:
On Jan 25, 2023, at 10:55 , Gedare Bloom wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 2:25 AM Christian MAUDERER
wrote:
On 2023-01-25 10:05, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 25.01.23 10:01, Christian MAUDERER wrote:
On
On 2023-01-25 19:10, Peter Dufault wrote:
On Jan 25, 2023, at 10:55 , Gedare Bloom wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 2:25 AM Christian MAUDERER
wrote:
On 2023-01-25 10:05, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 25.01.23 10:01, Christian MAUDERER wrote:
On 2023-01-25 09:59, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On
> On Jan 25, 2023, at 10:55 , Gedare Bloom wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 2:25 AM Christian MAUDERER
> wrote:
>>
>> On 2023-01-25 10:05, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>> On 25.01.23 10:01, Christian MAUDERER wrote:
On 2023-01-25 09:59, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 25.01.23 09:52,
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 2:25 AM Christian MAUDERER
wrote:
>
> On 2023-01-25 10:05, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> > On 25.01.23 10:01, Christian MAUDERER wrote:
> >> On 2023-01-25 09:59, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> >>> On 25.01.23 09:52, Christian MAUDERER wrote:
> OK. Updated list based on Thomas
On 2023-01-25 10:05, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 25.01.23 10:01, Christian MAUDERER wrote:
On 2023-01-25 09:59, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 25.01.23 09:52, Christian MAUDERER wrote:
OK. Updated list based on Thomas and Sebastians feedback:
From highest to lowest priority:
- Real time
On 25.01.23 10:01, Christian MAUDERER wrote:
On 2023-01-25 09:59, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 25.01.23 09:52, Christian MAUDERER wrote:
OK. Updated list based on Thomas and Sebastians feedback:
From highest to lowest priority:
- Real time capabilities: No hard real time requirements for
On 2023-01-25 09:59, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 25.01.23 09:52, Christian MAUDERER wrote:
OK. Updated list based on Thomas and Sebastians feedback:
From highest to lowest priority:
- Real time capabilities: No hard real time requirements for libbsd
core, but we have to make sure that it
On 25.01.23 09:52, Christian MAUDERER wrote:
OK. Updated list based on Thomas and Sebastians feedback:
From highest to lowest priority:
- Real time capabilities: No hard real time requirements for libbsd
core, but we have to make sure that it doesn't have a (relevant)
negative impact on
OK. Updated list based on Thomas and Sebastians feedback:
From highest to lowest priority:
- Real time capabilities: No hard real time requirements for libbsd
core, but we have to make sure that it doesn't have a (relevant)
negative impact on other subsystems.
- Maintainability: How easy is
On 23.01.23 16:39, Thomas DOERFLER wrote:
since we are maintaining an RTOS: IMHO Real time capabilities would need
a higher level, even above code/RAM sizes.
Meaining that the libbsd functionality should not have a (significant)
negative impact on RTEMS tasks NOT using libbsd.
There is
Hello,
since we are maintaining an RTOS: IMHO Real time capabilities would need
a higher level, even above code/RAM sizes.
Meaining that the libbsd functionality should not have a (significant)
negative impact on RTEMS tasks NOT using libbsd.
wkr,
Thomas.
Am 23.01.23 um 14:33 schrieb
Hello,
like suggested earlier in the original discussion I would suggest to
prioritize our development goals for libbsd and later evaluate the two
problems discussed in the thread based on this. Let's first agree on
development goals (that also can be added to the libbsd documentation).
From
12 matches
Mail list logo
