On 10/23/2015 08:50 AM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
On October 23, 2015 7:02:34 AM CDT, Joel Sherrill
wrote:
On October 22, 2015 1:37:18 PM CDT, Isaac Gutekunst
wrote:
I think I may have some information that's actually useful.
I've
On October 23, 2015 7:02:34 AM CDT, Joel Sherrill
wrote:
>
>
>On October 22, 2015 1:37:18 PM CDT, Isaac Gutekunst
> wrote:
>>I think I may have some information that's actually useful.
>>
>>I've managed to actually execute some tests
On 10/23/2015 8:01 AM, Isaac Gutekunst wrote:
On 10/23/2015 08:50 AM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
On October 23, 2015 7:02:34 AM CDT, Joel Sherrill
wrote:
On October 22, 2015 1:37:18 PM CDT, Isaac Gutekunst
wrote:
I think I may have some
On October 22, 2015 1:37:18 PM CDT, Isaac Gutekunst
wrote:
>I think I may have some information that's actually useful.
>
>I've managed to actually execute some tests and lots of them are
>failing.
>
>sp01 and sp02 fail quite quickly, as an assertion fails.
>
We finally have a culprit. Enabling the CAN driver causes the same tests to
fail.
Thank you everyone for all the help! We actually have something to go on now.
Isaac
On 10/23/2015 09:37 AM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
On 10/23/2015 8:01 AM, Isaac Gutekunst wrote:
On 10/23/2015 08:50 AM, Joel
You can run the test suite on Qemu using the lm3s6965 BSP (you need Qemu
patches, see source directory of the BSP). I did run the tests and it
looks good.
On 22/10/15 20:37, Isaac Gutekunst wrote:
I think I may have some information that's actually useful.
I've managed to actually execute
I think I may have some information that's actually useful.
I've managed to actually execute some tests and lots of them are failing.
sp01 and sp02 fail quite quickly, as an assertion fails.
assertion "first != _Chain_Tail( _queues[ index ] )" failed: file
On 10/21/2015 9:09 AM, Isaac Gutekunst wrote:
On 10/21/2015 09:58 AM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
On 10/21/2015 8:35 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 21/10/15 15:08, Isaac Gutekunst wrote:
On 10/21/2015 09:00 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 21/10/15 14:56, Isaac Gutekunst wrote:
On
On 10/21/2015 8:35 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 21/10/15 15:08, Isaac Gutekunst wrote:
On 10/21/2015 09:00 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 21/10/15 14:56, Isaac Gutekunst wrote:
On 10/21/2015 08:24 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 21/10/15 14:13, Isaac Gutekunst wrote:
Thanks for the
On 21/10/15 15:08, Isaac Gutekunst wrote:
On 10/21/2015 09:00 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 21/10/15 14:56, Isaac Gutekunst wrote:
On 10/21/2015 08:24 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 21/10/15 14:13, Isaac Gutekunst wrote:
Thanks for the reply.
On 10/21/2015 01:50 AM, Sebastian Huber
On 21/10/15 15:35, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 21/10/15 15:08, Isaac Gutekunst wrote:
On 10/21/2015 09:00 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 21/10/15 14:56, Isaac Gutekunst wrote:
On 10/21/2015 08:24 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 21/10/15 14:13, Isaac Gutekunst wrote:
Thanks for the
On 21/10/15 15:48, Jay Doyle wrote:
On 10/21/2015 09:35 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 21/10/15 15:08, Isaac Gutekunst wrote:
On 10/21/2015 09:00 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 21/10/15 14:56, Isaac Gutekunst wrote:
On 10/21/2015 08:24 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 21/10/15 14:13,
On 10/21/2015 08:24 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 21/10/15 14:13, Isaac Gutekunst wrote:
Thanks for the reply.
On 10/21/2015 01:50 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 20/10/15 16:02, Isaac Gutekunst wrote:
[...]
As far as I can tell this would only occur if the caller of
On 21/10/15 14:56, Isaac Gutekunst wrote:
On 10/21/2015 08:24 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 21/10/15 14:13, Isaac Gutekunst wrote:
Thanks for the reply.
On 10/21/2015 01:50 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 20/10/15 16:02, Isaac Gutekunst wrote:
[...]
As far as I can tell this would
On 10/21/2015 09:00 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 21/10/15 14:56, Isaac Gutekunst wrote:
On 10/21/2015 08:24 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 21/10/15 14:13, Isaac Gutekunst wrote:
Thanks for the reply.
On 10/21/2015 01:50 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 20/10/15 16:02, Isaac Gutekunst
Hi Devel,
I'm pretty sure this is a devel question, not users.
I'm working with a colleague at Vecna to port lwIP to the STM32F7 BSP we've
developed.
We have a basic HTTP server that prints out the current list of tasks. We refresh the page at a
very high rate, and after about 1-30 minutes,
On 20/10/15 16:02, Isaac Gutekunst wrote:
Hi Devel,
I'm pretty sure this is a devel question, not users.
I'm working with a colleague at Vecna to port lwIP to the STM32F7 BSP
we've developed.
We have a basic HTTP server that prints out the current list of tasks.
We refresh the page at a
17 matches
Mail list logo