On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 11:17 PM, Chris Johns chr...@rtems.org wrote:
On 14/08/2014 6:58 am, Gedare Bloom wrote:
We need to decide if we want 1 repo per tool or a consolidated tools
repo. My opinion is to add the rtl-host and rtems-coverage as
git-submodules within another repo the project
On 8/13/2014 10:13 PM, Chris Johns wrote:
On 14/08/2014 7:34 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
On 8/13/2014 3:49 PM, Krzysztof Mięsowicz wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for your replies :-) I didn't see librld.a because I had old
version of repo and after updating it appears :-)
I think for now it would be
Hi,
I think we have small misunderstanding here :-) I'm currently trying to
move symbol generation to covoar - previously symbol list was generated in
shell script do_coverage.sh and passed to covoar in configuration file or
as a command line argument. What we want now is to allow covoar to
Hi,
Sorry about not responding before now. It had dropped of my list and I
had forgotten about it.
On 12/08/2014 9:58 pm, Krzysztof Mięsowicz wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently working on adding symbol generation to covoar. I'm going
to use rtl::process::execute function to run nm from covoar (as
On 8/13/2014 3:28 PM, Chris Johns wrote:
Hi,
Sorry about not responding before now. It had dropped of my list and I
had forgotten about it.
On 12/08/2014 9:58 pm, Krzysztof Mięsowicz wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently working on adding symbol generation to covoar. I'm going
to use
Hi,
Thanks for your replies :-) I didn't see librld.a because I had old version
of repo and after updating it appears :-)
I think for now it would be better to get everything integrated with old
nm-based approach. I had it working as a separate module, now I will
integrate it into covoar. I
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 4:48 PM, Joel Sherrill
joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com wrote:
On 8/13/2014 3:28 PM, Chris Johns wrote:
Hi,
Sorry about not responding before now. It had dropped of my list and I
had forgotten about it.
On 12/08/2014 9:58 pm, Krzysztof Mięsowicz wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently
On 8/13/2014 3:49 PM, Krzysztof Mięsowicz wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for your replies :-) I didn't see librld.a because I had old
version of repo and after updating it appears :-)
I think for now it would be better to get everything integrated with
old nm-based approach. I had it working as a
On 14/08/2014 7:34 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
On 8/13/2014 3:49 PM, Krzysztof Mięsowicz wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for your replies :-) I didn't see librld.a because I had old
version of repo and after updating it appears :-)
I think for now it would be better to get everything integrated with
old
