Hi Thomas,
Thomas Petazzoni wrote,
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, 19 Aug 2016 21:46:44 +0200, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
>
> > Isn't it like with librt? Usually you use -lrt when using any
> > advanced realtime functions from the C library.
> > And any tutorial you find with your favourite internet search e
Hello,
On Fri, 19 Aug 2016 16:14:31 -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> > Isn't it like with librt? Usually you use -lrt when using any
> > advanced realtime functions from the C library.
> > And any tutorial you find with your favourite internet search engine
> > mentions to use -lpthread or -pthread wh
Hello,
On Fri, 19 Aug 2016 21:46:44 +0200, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
> Isn't it like with librt? Usually you use -lrt when using any
> advanced realtime functions from the C library.
> And any tutorial you find with your favourite internet search engine
> mentions to use -lpthread or -pthread when
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 09:46:44PM +0200, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
> Thomas Petazzoni wrote,
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Fri, 19 Aug 2016 14:03:45 -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> >
> > > If they want to keep taking advantage of the nop-out hack for dynamic
> > > linking glibc, a suitable so
Hi Thomas,
Thomas Petazzoni wrote,
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, 19 Aug 2016 14:03:45 -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
>
> > If they want to keep taking advantage of the nop-out hack for dynamic
> > linking glibc, a suitable solution would be a configure check
> > something like:
> >
> > checking whether -larc
Hello,
On Fri, 19 Aug 2016 14:03:45 -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> If they want to keep taking advantage of the nop-out hack for dynamic
> linking glibc, a suitable solution would be a configure check
> something like:
>
> checking whether -larchive needs -lpthread... yes
That's a whole lot of wor
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 07:53:20PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Hello,
>
> [Adding Rich in Cc.]
>
> On Fri, 19 Aug 2016 19:34:43 +0200, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
>
> > > Do we have a list of the pthread functions that libc.so/libc.a is
> > > supposed to provide? See the mail I just send about
Hello,
[Adding Rich in Cc.]
On Fri, 19 Aug 2016 19:34:43 +0200, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
> > Do we have a list of the pthread functions that libc.so/libc.a is
> > supposed to provide? See the mail I just send about the axel/libintl
> > issue where libintl also uses pthread_rwlock_*() without bei
Hi Leonid,
Leonid Lisovskiy wrote,
> On 8/17/16, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
> > I can do the regression testing if you cookup a patch?
>
> First of all, we must to ask topic starter Thomas Petazzoni to check
> the patch after it will be cooked.
> Yes, I can try to prepare the patch against linuxth
Hi Thomas,
Thomas Petazzoni wrote,
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 22:33:35 +0200, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
>
> > What about following patch, which creates dummies for
> > pthread_mutex_* functions in the !SHARED case:
> >
> > From 8d11aa1b9a983e0422dffa84eb1a7b71c616a096 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2
On 8/17/16, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
> I can do the regression testing if you cookup a patch?
First of all, we must to ask topic starter Thomas Petazzoni to check
the patch after it will be cooked.
Yes, I can try to prepare the patch against linuxthreads, but it will
consume some time.
Regards,
11 matches
Mail list logo
