Hi Thomas, Anthony,
Anthony G. Basile wrote,
> On 6/22/17 9:06 AM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 08:47:06 -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> >
> >> Yes, I'm worried about regressions. __FAVOR_BSD is still used in the
> >> following:
> >>
> >> include/setjmp.h
>
On 6/22/17 9:06 AM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 08:47:06 -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
>
>> Yes, I'm worried about regressions. __FAVOR_BSD is still used in the
>> following:
>>
>> include/setjmp.h
>> include/unistd.h
>> include/signal.h
>> include/features.h
>> i
Hello,
On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 08:47:06 -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> Yes, I'm worried about regressions. __FAVOR_BSD is still used in the
> following:
>
> include/setjmp.h
> include/unistd.h
> include/signal.h
> include/features.h
> include/netinet/udp.h
>
> and deals with the differences in
On 6/22/17 8:37 AM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 08:33:31 -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
>
>> I just did a grep of glibc master/HEAD and it looks like __FAVOR_BSD has
>> been removed. If we remove __FAVOR_BSD from uclibc, will buildroot
>> stuff build fine? You can te
Hello,
On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 08:33:31 -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> I just did a grep of glibc master/HEAD and it looks like __FAVOR_BSD has
> been removed. If we remove __FAVOR_BSD from uclibc, will buildroot
> stuff build fine? You can test by just removing those lines from
> features.h and
On 6/21/17 4:11 PM, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
> Hi,
> Thomas Petazzoni wrote,
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Wed, 31 May 2017 23:41:26 +, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
>>> From: "Anthony G. Basile"
>>>
>>> man feature_test_macros(7) specifies that _BSD_SOURCE and _SVID_SOURCE have
>>> been deprecated in favor
