Hi Lucian,
Lucian Cojocar wrote,
> Waldemar Brodkorb ucibc-ng.org> writes:
>
> >
> > Hi Lucian,
> > Lucian Cojocar wrote,
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Any follow-up on this patch?
> >
> > Not yet. You are saying the second segmentation fault would be
> > expected. What is then the exact benefit
Waldemar Brodkorb ucibc-ng.org> writes:
>
> Hi Lucian,
> Lucian Cojocar wrote,
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Any follow-up on this patch?
>
> Not yet. You are saying the second segmentation fault would be
> expected. What is then the exact benefit of the patch, if the result
> is a segfault?
'memset' w
Hi Lucian,
Lucian Cojocar wrote,
> Hi,
>
> Any follow-up on this patch?
Not yet. You are saying the second segmentation fault would be
expected. What is then the exact benefit of the patch, if the result
is a segfault?
Or do you have a simple testcase showing breakage before your patch
and non-
Hi,
Any follow-up on this patch?
Thanks,
Lucian
On 06/10/2016 06:44 PM, Lucian Cojocar wrote:
> The 'BLT' instruction checks for *signed* values. So if a3, length
> parameter of memset, is negative, then value added to the PC will be
> large.
>
> memset(buf, 0xaa, 0x) triggers the bug.
