Hi Vineet,
Vineet Gupta wrote,
> _dl_zalloc callers don't check for allocaton failure. It kind of makes
> sense since such early allocations are unlikely to fail, and even if
> they do, ldso would segv anyways thus bringing the issue to attention.
>
> However there's a gcc nuance which led to thi
_dl_zalloc callers don't check for allocaton failure. It kind of makes
sense since such early allocations are unlikely to fail, and even if
they do, ldso would segv anyways thus bringing the issue to attention.
However there's a gcc nuance which led to this patch.
It seems gcc at -O2 (for DODEBUG
