Re: [uclibc-ng-devel] write is not weak?

2018-06-25 Thread Waldemar Brodkorb
Hi, Christophe Lyon wrote, > > > What am I missing? > > > > May be it is just not implemented as weak in uClibc-ng/uClibc. > It was weak in our uClibc port. > I'm trying to understand it is no longer the case now that I rebased > the patches on top of uClibc-ng: is it a problem with uClib-ng or a

Re: [uclibc-ng-devel] write is not weak?

2018-06-25 Thread Christophe Lyon
On Sun, 24 Jun 2018 at 18:37, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote: > > Hi Christophe, > Christophe Lyon wrote, > > > Hi, > > > > While working on FDPIC support for ARM in uclibc-ng, I've noticed that > > the write() function if defined as a strong global symbol, while the > > __GI_write alias is weak. > > >

Re: [uclibc-ng-devel] write is not weak?

2018-06-24 Thread Waldemar Brodkorb
Hi Christophe, Christophe Lyon wrote, > Hi, > > While working on FDPIC support for ARM in uclibc-ng, I've noticed that > the write() function if defined as a strong global symbol, while the > __GI_write alias is weak. > > 0034 wF .text 005c .hidden __GI_write > 0034 g F

[uclibc-ng-devel] write is not weak?

2018-06-22 Thread Christophe Lyon
Hi, While working on FDPIC support for ARM in uclibc-ng, I've noticed that the write() function if defined as a strong global symbol, while the __GI_write alias is weak. 0034 wF .text 005c .hidden __GI_write 0034 g F .text 005c write my pre-processed write.i