On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 10:53:07AM -0700, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jun 2004, Nicolas Joly wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 10:13:54AM -0700, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
> > >It might be that there is some mismatch in types on amd64.
> > > Eg. FB_SHIFT vs FbBits. It's hard to follow wh
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004, Nicolas Joly wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 10:13:54AM -0700, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
> >It might be that there is some mismatch in types on amd64.
> > Eg. FB_SHIFT vs FbBits. It's hard to follow what's going on
> > in fb.h.
>
> Agreed, i'm not comfortable with that piece
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 10:13:54AM -0700, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
>It might be that there is some mismatch in types on amd64.
> Eg. FB_SHIFT vs FbBits. It's hard to follow what's going on
> in fb.h.
Agreed, i'm not comfortable with that piece of code.
But, in my case, FB_SHIFT is defined to 5
http://tqqqt.mhcnjcnn.info/?ve1AxM_F4z6Uh__cGLLx
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel