From a functionality point of view, what is the difference between
using Option UseFBDev and using the fb device driver directly via
Driver fbdev in XF86Config?
Specifically, in the case where I specify Driver radeon and Option
UseFBDev exactly what parts of the radeon fb driver are used
How do I do an XFree86 v4.3.0 build with debug symbols enabled?
-dean andreakis
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Ben,
Thanks for the information. I used fbset -x and updated XF86Config-4
accordingly.
All of the test results from my original post were without using the
kernel fbdev driver. I just now went ahead and added Option UseFBDev
to the lcd-related device section in XF86Config-4 and set BusID to
trying to load...
thx,
-dean andreakis
On Fri, 2003-06-13 at 14:47, Alex Deucher wrote:
this is from the DRI (front, back, and depth buffers) not the 2D driver
I think.
Alex
--- Andreakis, Dean (MED) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(WW) RADEON (0): Static buffer allocation failed -- need
]
Subject: RE: extending radeon driver for dual-headed mode
On Wed, 2003-05-21 at 17:04, Andreakis, Dean (MED) wrote:
1. DRI on my x86/RH9 is now disabled where it was enbled before the
changes.I will post my XF86Config and log file to the dri users list.
See http://bugs.xfree86.org/cgi-bin
