to actually verify that the
hardware I have is not supported by the ATI
driver?
Should I open a bug in bugzilla?
Thanks,
Salvio
Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Salvio wrote:
On Sun, 16 Nov 2003, Salvio wrote:
I have attached the latest config file and log.
What
keep in
working order and want to test the procedure before making at risk this
one).
Thanks,
Salvio
Marc Aurele La France wrote:
On Sun, 16 Nov 2003, Salvio wrote:
I have attached the latest config file and log.
I was incorrect in stating #1: I was testing the system disabling
do you have any thoughs?
Marc Aurele La France wrote:
On Sun, 16 Nov 2003, Salvio wrote:
I have attached the latest config file and log.
I see no attachments here.
Marc.
+--+---+
| Marc Aurele La France | work
Actually the window in which I run top only refreshes when
the CPU is not maxed out. I'm trying to find a way of logging
to a file the CPU activity but it all seems to me that the X
process if eating all the CPU cycles.
Salvio wrote:
before changing anything, when moving windows, top shows:
70
to present days) and none of them has been actually
answered.
Let me know if there are other things I can try.
Thanks,
Salvio
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
,
Salvio
Marc Aurele La France wrote:
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Salvio wrote:
If `top` shows that the server is not entirely to blame for the CPU load,
see if turning on backing store has any effect.
CPU is idle - CPU is maxed out when moving windows
swap memory is not used
less than 50
: I'm using Red Hat 9 which ships with Gnome. This problem happens
using Gnome and it is a general problem across all X applications.
Salvio
Marc Aurele La France wrote:
On Sat, 8 Nov 2003, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
On Fri, 7 Nov 2003, Salvio Sergi wrote:
Everything starts fine
windows)
Is this a 3D app?
No.
This happens with all X applcations.
I'm testing using two XTerm windows and an empty desktop.
what is the meaning of this?
see if turning on backing store has any effect
What else do you need to know?
Salvio
Marc Aurele La France wrote:
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Salvio
OK - thanks
I'll have to try that on Friday (I won't be home before...) and will
post the results.
- Salvio
Marc Aurele La France wrote:
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Salvio wrote:
If `top` shows that the server is not entirely to blame for the CPU load,
see if turning on backing store has any
all possible permutations): always
with the same results.
I finally tried Accel on and off with no apparent consequence
(same speed)
Thanks,
Salvio
# XFree86 4 configuration created by redhat-config-xfree86
Section ServerLayout
Identifier Default Layout
Screen 0 Screen0 0 0
10 matches
Mail list logo
