one in limit-check for ScrnLimitChar function
(report by Egmont Koblinger).
--
Thomas E. Dickey
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@XFree86.Org
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, Warren Turkal wrote:
> Is there an effort to get rid of NeedFunctionPrototypes and to convert
> function prototypes to ANSI style? If so, I would like to work on doing
> this for the xwininfo binary.
People do work on this occasionally. I've made some notes here:
ht
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, Warren Turkal wrote:
>
> > Is there an effort to get rid of NeedFunctionPrototypes and to convert
> > function prototypes to ANSI style? If so, I would like to work on doing
> > this for the xwininfo binary.
>
>I change them whe
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
> Todd T. Fries wrote:
>
> > Penned by Daniel Stone on Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 04:51:49PM +1000, we have:
> > [..]
> > | I did suggest this (mv hp,v hp.old,v).
> >
> > If you guys care about history at all, aka the ability to checkout files
> > in the past
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 06:14:06AM -0500, Todd T. Fries wrote:
> > Penned by Daniel Stone on Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 04:51:49PM +1000, we have:
> > [..]
> > | I did suggest this (mv hp,v hp.old,v).
> >
> > If you guys care about history at all, aka the abili
On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, Thomas Dickey wrote:
>
> >> Would it be sensible and acceptable to have xterm default to
> >> using the encoding of the user's locale at startup? Seems to be
> >
> >only if you happen to be running redhat 8.x
>
> I'd like to know w
On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote:
> | I guess the comparable chunks are like this:
> |
> | select(6, [4 5], [], NULL, {0, 0}) = 1 (in [4], left {0, 0})
> | select(5, [4], [], [], {0, 0}) = 1 (in [4], left {0, 0})
> | select(5, [4], [], [], {0, 0}) = 1 (in [4], left {0, 0})
> | select(5
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Jamie Risk wrote:
> I don't know where, but I came across a information about bison
> version information for compiling XFree86. I'm not hurt that it didn't
> come from this list, but even an impolite "Use bison 1.35: RTFM!"
> would have been useful.
byacc is preferable.
(th