On Tuesday 15 July 2003 1:32 pm, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
[...]
I feel that the fact SharedLibObjCompile() is unused in our _current_ tree
is insufficient reason to remove it.
It provides nothing over and above NormalSharedLibObjCompile which is used.
Maybe I'm wrong...
Nick
On Tuesday 15 July 2003 4:00 pm, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
[...]
The imake rule in question will not be removed because there is nothing
to preclude its use by external packages such as those found in X.Org's
contrib/.
Ok. Thanks for explaining.
Am I on a road to nowhere in attempting to
On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Nick Hudson wrote:
The imake rule in question will not be removed because there is nothing
to preclude its use by external packages such as those found in X.Org's
contrib/.
Ok. Thanks for explaining.
Am I on a road to nowhere in attempting to change the build