Last mail for today, I checked ATI's fglrx source code and the pci.ids database and I found some discrepancies with XFree86's code (radeon_probe.c) for the identification of the chipsets. I would normally tell ATI is right, but ...
PCI_CHIP_RV380_3152 "ATI Radeon Mobility X300 (M24) 3152 (PCIE)" => fglrx : ATI MOBILITY RADEON X300 (M22 3152), so RV370 chipset (instead of RV380) => pci.ids : ATI|M22 [Radeon Mobility X300] PCI_CHIP_RV360_AR "ATI Radeon 9600XT AR (AGP)" => fglrx : ATI RADEON 9600 Series (RV350/RV360 4152) => pci.ids : ATI|RV350 AR [Radeon 9600] PCI_CHIP_RV370_5462 "ATI Radeon Mobility X600 SE (M24C) 5462 (PCIE)" => fglrx and pci.ids agree, but according to the radeon(4x) man page, the M24 chipset is comparable to a RV380 (instead of RV370) PCI_CHIP_RV370_5B62 "ATI Radeon X600 (RV370) 5B62 (PCIE)" => pci.ids : ATI|RV380 [Radeon X600 (PCIE)] => according to the radeon(4x) man page, the X600 has a RV380 chipset (instead of RV370) => but fglrx also says : RADEON X600 Series (RV370 5B62) whereas other X600 are given as RV380 PCI_CHIP_RS350_7835 "ATI Radeon Mobility 9200 IGP 7835" => fglrx : MOBILITY RADEON 9000 IGP RL300MB (what is RL300 ???) PCI_CHIP_RS300_5835 "ATI Radeon Mobility 9100 IGP (U3) 5835" => fglrx says : RS300M chipset ??? Moreover, the man page and source code should indicate clearly where the DRI is supported or not, because RADEONPreInitDRI(), is not always clean with that. Loïc Mahé - Toulouse, France
