On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 07:52:28AM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Alex Deucher dixit:
and two for bsd
1. bsd monolithic
2. bsd-coremodular as above
why not just let the kernel provide the drm? Most if not all recent
linux and bsd kernels (last few years) have drm
Alex Deucher dixit:
and two for bsd
1. bsd monolithic
2. bsd-coremodular as above
why not just let the kernel provide the drm? Most if not all recent
linux and bsd kernels (last few years) have drm support. The dri and
ddx will adapt depending on what's
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 06:03:41PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 11:55:58AM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 10:05:38AM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
But isn't it better to move forward than backwards ?
If the result is no better, then we need to fix the
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 11:55:58AM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 10:05:38AM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
But isn't it better to move forward than backwards ?
If the result is no better, then we need to fix the problems found. Going
back to an older version, and just because
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 08:14:59PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
Some have said here today that the drivers can adapt to older DRM
versions. That's how it should be, but I don't know if it is true
or not. I've seen some things in my initial testing that may cast
some doubt on it, but there were too
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 08:14:59PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 11:52:27PM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 06:40:07PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 11:24:43PM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 06:17:50PM -0500,
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 10:05:38AM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 08:14:59PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 11:52:27PM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 06:40:07PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 11:24:43PM +,
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 11:32:56AM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
It looks like the DRM kernel source in xc/extras/drm is broken and
incomplete, especially for BSD platforms. The Linux version only
appears to build for a narrow range of kernels, and this either
needs to be fixed, or the minimum
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 04:40:42PM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 11:32:56AM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
It looks like the DRM kernel source in xc/extras/drm is broken and
incomplete, especially for BSD platforms. The Linux version only
appears to build for a narrow range
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 11:59:15AM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 04:40:42PM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 11:32:56AM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
It looks like the DRM kernel source in xc/extras/drm is broken and
incomplete, especially for BSD
On Tuesday 08 of February 2005 17:59, David Dawes wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 04:40:42PM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 11:32:56AM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
It looks like the DRM kernel source in xc/extras/drm is broken and
incomplete, especially for BSD platforms.
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, David Dawes wrote:
It looks like the DRM kernel source in xc/extras/drm is broken and
incomplete, especially for BSD platforms. The Linux version only
appears to build for a narrow range of kernels, and this either
needs to be fixed, or the minimum kernel requirements
Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, David Dawes wrote:
It looks like the DRM kernel source in xc/extras/drm is broken and
incomplete, especially for BSD platforms. The Linux version only
appears to build for a narrow range of kernels, and this either
needs to be fixed, or the minimum
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 05:12:29PM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 11:59:15AM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 04:40:42PM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 11:32:56AM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
It looks like the DRM kernel source in
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 06:17:50PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 05:12:29PM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 11:59:15AM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 04:40:42PM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 11:32:56AM -0500,
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 11:24:43PM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 06:17:50PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 05:12:29PM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 11:59:15AM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 04:40:42PM +,
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 06:40:07PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 11:24:43PM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 06:17:50PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 05:12:29PM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 11:59:15AM -0500,
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 11:52:27PM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 06:40:07PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 11:24:43PM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 06:17:50PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 05:12:29PM +,
On Wednesday 09 of February 2005 00:24, Alan Hourihane wrote:
If we import the current DRM trunk code, there are three linux directories.
1. linux for 2.4 kernels (monolithic)
2. linux-2.6 for 2.6 kernels (monolithic)
3. linux-core for 2.6 kernels with modular
19 matches
Mail list logo
