Re: SupportConvertXXtoXX

2004-03-06 Thread David Dawes
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 09:36:19PM -0800, Mark Vojkovich wrote: On Fri, 5 Mar 2004, David Dawes wrote: On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 03:28:09AM +0100, Thomas Winischhofer wrote: Mark Vojkovich wrote: On Fri, 5 Mar 2004, Thomas Winischhofer wrote: David Dawes wrote: On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at

Re: SupportConvertXXtoXX

2004-03-06 Thread Mark Vojkovich
On Sat, 6 Mar 2004, David Dawes wrote: I thought we stopped using 64 bit scanlines altogether. Hmm, yes it looks that way. I guess we can remove that then, and the related code in xf86Init.c. When you use 64 bit scanlines you introduce a mess in the PutImage code. You have to

Re: SupportConvertXXtoXX

2004-03-05 Thread Thomas Winischhofer
David Dawes wrote: On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 01:38:06AM +0100, Thomas Winischhofer wrote: What exactly does a video driver have to be able to do if the SupportConvert32to24 flag is set at calling xf86SetDepthBpp, provided the hardware supports, for instance, 24bpp (framebuffer depth) only? It

Re: SupportConvertXXtoXX

2004-03-05 Thread Mark Vojkovich
On Fri, 5 Mar 2004, Thomas Winischhofer wrote: David Dawes wrote: On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 01:38:06AM +0100, Thomas Winischhofer wrote: What exactly does a video driver have to be able to do if the SupportConvert32to24 flag is set at calling xf86SetDepthBpp, provided the hardware supports,

Re: SupportConvertXXtoXX

2004-03-05 Thread Thomas Winischhofer
Mark Vojkovich wrote: On Fri, 5 Mar 2004, Thomas Winischhofer wrote: David Dawes wrote: On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 01:38:06AM +0100, Thomas Winischhofer wrote: What exactly does a video driver have to be able to do if the SupportConvert32to24 flag is set at calling xf86SetDepthBpp, provided the

Re: SupportConvertXXtoXX

2004-03-05 Thread David Dawes
On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 03:28:09AM +0100, Thomas Winischhofer wrote: Mark Vojkovich wrote: On Fri, 5 Mar 2004, Thomas Winischhofer wrote: David Dawes wrote: On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 01:38:06AM +0100, Thomas Winischhofer wrote: What exactly does a video driver have to be able to do if the

Re: SupportConvertXXtoXX

2004-03-05 Thread Mark Vojkovich
On Fri, 5 Mar 2004, David Dawes wrote: On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 03:28:09AM +0100, Thomas Winischhofer wrote: Mark Vojkovich wrote: On Fri, 5 Mar 2004, Thomas Winischhofer wrote: David Dawes wrote: On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 01:38:06AM +0100, Thomas Winischhofer wrote: What exactly

SupportConvertXXtoXX

2004-03-04 Thread Thomas Winischhofer
What exactly does a video driver have to be able to do if the SupportConvert32to24 flag is set at calling xf86SetDepthBpp, provided the hardware supports, for instance, 24bpp (framebuffer depth) only? (SupportConvert24to32 vice versa) Thomas -- Thomas Winischhofer Vienna/Austria thomas AT

Re: SupportConvertXXtoXX

2004-03-04 Thread Mark Vojkovich
On Fri, 5 Mar 2004, Thomas Winischhofer wrote: What exactly does a video driver have to be able to do if the SupportConvert32to24 flag is set at calling xf86SetDepthBpp, provided the hardware supports, for instance, 24bpp (framebuffer depth) only? It's expected to support a 24bpp

Re: SupportConvertXXtoXX

2004-03-04 Thread Thomas Winischhofer
Mark Vojkovich wrote: On Fri, 5 Mar 2004, Thomas Winischhofer wrote: What exactly does a video driver have to be able to do if the SupportConvert32to24 flag is set at calling xf86SetDepthBpp, provided the hardware supports, for instance, 24bpp (framebuffer depth) only? It's expected to

Re: SupportConvertXXtoXX

2004-03-04 Thread David Dawes
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 01:38:06AM +0100, Thomas Winischhofer wrote: What exactly does a video driver have to be able to do if the SupportConvert32to24 flag is set at calling xf86SetDepthBpp, provided the hardware supports, for instance, 24bpp (framebuffer depth) only? It has to use a