Re: glx failing

2003-11-14 Thread Frank Gießler
David Dawes wrote: The patch below fixes the problem. The command lengths for several rendering requests were getting set incorrectly because of mis-ordered variable initialisations. I'm committing it now. Index: g_render.c === RCS

Re: glx failing

2003-11-14 Thread David Dawes
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 12:40:55PM +0100, Frank Gießler wrote: David Dawes wrote: The patch below fixes the problem. The command lengths for several rendering requests were getting set incorrectly because of mis-ordered variable initialisations. I'm committing it now. Index: g_render.c

Re: glx failing

2003-11-13 Thread Torrey Lyons
At 10:01 AM -0800 11/10/03, Ian Romanick wrote: Frank Gießler wrote: with my current CVS snapshot (Changelog up to #530), glxgears gives me the following at startup: X Error of failed request: BadLength (poly request too large or internal Xlib length error) Major opcode of failed request:

Re: glx failing

2003-11-13 Thread David Dawes
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 04:40:30PM -0800, Torrey Lyons wrote: At 10:01 AM -0800 11/10/03, Ian Romanick wrote: Frank Gießler wrote: with my current CVS snapshot (Changelog up to #530), glxgears gives me the following at startup: X Error of failed request: BadLength (poly request too large or

glx failing

2003-11-10 Thread Frank Gießler
Hi all, with my current CVS snapshot (Changelog up to #530), glxgears gives me the following at startup: X Error of failed request: BadLength (poly request too large or internal Xlib length error) Major opcode of failed request: 144 (GLX) Minor opcode of failed request: 1 (X_GLXRender)

Re: glx failing

2003-11-10 Thread Ian Romanick
Frank Gießler wrote: with my current CVS snapshot (Changelog up to #530), glxgears gives me the following at startup: X Error of failed request: BadLength (poly request too large or internal Xlib length error) Major opcode of failed request: 144 (GLX) Minor opcode of failed request: 1