Hi,
I've been running S3's Savage driver (version 1.1.18 S3) for the last
few days. I've been using a somewhat hackish setup, using
- the 2D driver within a current CVS HEAD server;
- the kernel module built from 4.2.0 sources and a heavily patched
2.4.18 kernel;
- the 3D driver built
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 12:25:16PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
No, there you are exagerating. I hardly doubt that they would go broke
or whatever if they released open source drivers. If anything, they
would sell more boards.
Not very many, and their competitirs would then have access to all
On Fri, 18 Jul 2003, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jul 2003, Tim Roberts wrote:
On 18 Jul 2003 20:16:35 -0500, William Suetholz wrote:
In business terms, the Linux market is not relevant. Sad but true.
For consumer desktop that's true. There is one potential business
case in the
Am Sam, 2003-07-19 um 17.52 schrieb Fred Heitkamp:
On Fri, 18 Jul 2003, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jul 2003, Tim Roberts wrote:
On 18 Jul 2003 20:16:35 -0500, William Suetholz wrote:
In business terms, the Linux market is not relevant. Sad but true.
For consumer desktop that's
On Sat, Jul 19, 2003 at 11:52:47AM -0400, Fred Heitkamp wrote:
If the server market is the biggest (and for Linux it is) then
only 2D support if that is required. I'd bet even the big
film studios don't use Linux to view the final rendering. They
probably use a Mac (Apple OS of some kind)
On 19 Jul, Havoc Pennington wrote:
On Sat, Jul 19, 2003 at 11:52:47AM -0400, Fred Heitkamp wrote:
If the server market is the biggest (and for Linux it is) then
only 2D support if that is required. I'd bet even the big
film studios don't use Linux to view the final rendering. They
probably
Hi,
PLEASE CC any answers to [EMAIL PROTECTED] as I'm not subscribed to the list.
first, my problem as summarized by David H. Dawes:
It appears that some 855GM-based laptops only pre-allocate 1MB of video
memory, and don't provide any BIOS configuration options for increasing
this. Although the
On Sat, 19 Jul 2003, Fred Heitkamp wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jul 2003, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jul 2003, Tim Roberts wrote:
On 18 Jul 2003 20:16:35 -0500, William Suetholz wrote:
In business terms, the Linux market is not relevant. Sad but true.
For consumer desktop that's
On Fri, 18 Jul 2003, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
For consumer desktop that's true. There is one potential business
case in the professional desktop market. SGI's, HP's and Sun's old
workstation customers have been moving over to Linux.
Thats no market secret to anyone at all. You just
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003, Alexander Stohr wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jul 2003, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
From: Fred Heitkamp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If the server market is the biggest (and for Linux it is) then
only 2D support if that is required. I'd bet even the big
film studios don't use Linux
From: William Suetholz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mr. Harris, yes I am one of Those people who want a device to work
in my chosen operating system,
/me wants Commodore 64 - BASIC BIOS 2.0 support, call it my favorite!
Cool machine, boots in 2 seconds to a fully useable prompt.
It must be an
11 matches
Mail list logo
