> From: Mike A. Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I plan on replacing the Cards database in Red Hat Linux with a
> new mechanism sometime in the future which will be much more
> flexible, allow per architecture overrides, allow the config tool
> to know what hardware supports DRI and on what speci
On Fri, 4 Jul 2003, Chris Edgington wrote:
>Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2003 12:28:12 -0500
>From: Chris Edgington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="us-ascii"
>Subject: RH9 Display Settings Card List
>
>Does anyone know where t
Peter \"Firefly\" Lund wrote:
> > We have a report in Bugzilla (#464), concerning twm. This test can
> > only be made on NetBSD:
>
> Couldn't it be tracked down with valgrind?
In theory - yes.
Or use Rational Purify or Sun Workshop/Forte dbx (which has similar
functionality when you use the "che
There's a large number of docs in the X.org & XFree86 distributions under
xc/doc - most of them can also be found in PDF form at http://www.x-docs.org/
-Alan Coopersmith- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sun Microsystems, Inc. - Sun Software Group
Quality / User Experien
I'm not sure if this should be directed at you guys or the developers of x11
itself, but I was just wondering if you knew if there is a list of API's
available in X11/Xfree, and if so, where it can be found..
The reason I ask is because I am a contributing developer to wine and was
trying to find
On Sun, 6 Jul 2003, mnicolet wrote:
> I builded XFree86 4.2.0 on a not full *NIX compliant platform.
> I would like to test it extensively before I put it into production state.
> Does anyone know how to do it unattended ?
> Or, is there a test suite which tries all important/critical things befor
I builded XFree86 4.2.0 on a not full *NIX compliant platform.
I would like to test it extensively before I put it into production state.
Does anyone know how to do it unattended ?
Or, is there a test suite which tries all important/critical things before
they could bit ?
Thanks in advance
___
Some time ago, I posted a question regarding twm crash.
I was not able to reproduce it after, but I don´t played more than a few
minutes.
Later, some one told me that twm is inherently weak, and pointed me to fvwm.
My concern was mainly because I am new to X Windows, and I was fearing
regarding my
On Sat, 5 Jul 2003, Andras Huszar wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> How could I set the EXTRA_LDOPTIONS variable in every Makefile from xfree86.cf
> or other config file? Like CCOPTIONS, it's defined in xfree86.cf as:
> #define DefaultCCOptions -ansi -pedantic ...
Note that Imake.tmpl has
#ifndef E
