Re: Change of behavior of shift+ (without numlock)

2003-08-04 Thread David Dawes
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 03:10:02PM +0200, Egbert Eich wrote: >Bugzilla 558 requests to change the behavoir of shift+ > >> In reasonable X GUIs (GNome/KDE), shift + selects text. >> But if i press shift + , i get numbers! So the current XKB >> behavior makes Shift kind of like the "lockless" ver

Re: Change of behavior of shift+ (withoutnumlock)

2003-08-04 Thread James H. Cloos Jr.
> "Egbert" == Egbert Eich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Egbert> This requests sounds reasonable so I would like to find out if Egbert> somebody has a strong opinion on this issue. If not I will Egbert> commit the supplied fix. I'm on a notebook now, so it is less of an issue, but I've always l

Re: How to get individual screen's resolution in a TwinView setup?

2003-08-04 Thread Mark Vojkovich
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Ping Cheng wrote: > In my Wacom driver, I need to get each screen's resolution. Is there a way > to get it in XFree86? For one physical screen spread over two monitors (TwinView and TwinView- like implementations), not that I know of. The server itself has no understanding

How to get individual screen's resolution in a TwinView setup?

2003-08-04 Thread Ping Cheng
In my Wacom driver, I need to get each screen's resolution. Is there a way to get it in XFree86? Thanks for any help. Ping ___ Devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Rewrite of the NV driver

2003-08-04 Thread Mark Vojkovich
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Ducrot Bruno wrote: > On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 02:22:32PM -0700, Mark Vojkovich wrote: > > > >In CVS I have just checked in something I've been working on > > for a few weeks. It is a substantial rewrite of the nv driver, > > the main changes being removal of Riva128 int

Re: Seeking MergedFB - Xinerama development advice

2003-08-04 Thread Thomas Winischhofer
Alex Deucher wrote: I'd be interested in seeing your code once you have decided on a route, so that I can update the radeon mergedfb driver. I already thought of you. You will, no worries. Thomas -- Thomas Winischhofer Vienna/Austria thomas AT winischhofer DOT net *** http://www.winischh

Re: Seeking MergedFB - Xinerama development advice

2003-08-04 Thread Alex Deucher
I'd be interested in seeing your code once you have decided on a route, so that I can update the radeon mergedfb driver. Alex --- Thomas Winischhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > However, I am still interested in how the binary NVidia driver solves > > this logical puzzle. (I have changed my

Re: Seeking MergedFB - Xinerama development advice

2003-08-04 Thread Thomas Winischhofer
Alexander Stohr wrote: just a short comment on the illustrations... Mode 1: (fixed width font required for viewing) +--+ |++ +-+| ||| | || ||| | || |

RE: Seeking MergedFB - Xinerama development advice

2003-08-04 Thread Alexander Stohr
just a short comment on the illustrations... > Mode 1: (fixed width font required for viewing) > > +--+ > |++ +-+| > ||| | || > ||| | || > ||

RE: radeonfb in 2.6.0-test2 and radeon 320m

2003-08-04 Thread Alexander Stohr
> I have laptop with 320m radeon. radeonfb didn't seem > to work for it on 2.4.21. Has this changed in 2.6.0-test2? this is the XF86 development mailing list for the XF86 windowing system infrastructure. there are other people around that do work on the framebuffer device support. you might

Re: Change of behavior of shift+ (withoutnumlock)

2003-08-04 Thread Owen Taylor
On Mon, 2003-08-04 at 09:10, Egbert Eich wrote: > Bugzilla 558 requests to change the behavoir of shift+ > > > In reasonable X GUIs (GNome/KDE), shift + selects text. > > But if i press shift + , i get numbers! So the current XKB > > behavior makes Shift kind of like the "lockless" version of

Re: radeonfb in 2.6.0-test2 and radeon 320m

2003-08-04 Thread Alex Deucher
These questions are about the linux kernel framebuffer drivers and would probably be better answered on either the linux-kernel or linux-fbdev mailing lists. This ML is for Xfree86 development. Alex --- "Mr. Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have laptop with 320m radeon. radeonfb did

radeonfb in 2.6.0-test2 and radeon 320m

2003-08-04 Thread Mr. Mailing List
I have laptop with 320m radeon. radeonfb didn't seem to work for it on 2.4.21. Has this changed in 2.6.0-test2? __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com _

rivafb and 2.6.0test2

2003-08-04 Thread Mr. Mailing List
Does rivafb work(better than vesafb) with 2.6.0-test2 and nvidia drivers? i have geforce2. if so, how to change refresh rates? what resolutions are supported? __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo

Change of behavior of shift+ (without numlock)

2003-08-04 Thread Egbert Eich
Bugzilla 558 requests to change the behavoir of shift+ > In reasonable X GUIs (GNome/KDE), shift + selects text. > But if i press shift + , i get numbers! So the current XKB > behavior makes Shift kind of like the "lockless" version of Numlock, which is > insane, IMHO. the numpad keys are *ar

Seeking MergedFB - Xinerama development advice

2003-08-04 Thread Thomas Winischhofer
I now implemented a small Xinerama extension for the SiS driver's MergedFB mode, following the binary NVIDIA driver's example. However, since Xinerama and MergedFB (or Twinview, if you want) is not entirely the same, I encountered a logical problem during programming: With Xinerama, the two scr

Re: Rewrite of the NV driver

2003-08-04 Thread Ducrot Bruno
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 02:22:32PM -0700, Mark Vojkovich wrote: > >In CVS I have just checked in something I've been working on > for a few weeks. It is a substantial rewrite of the nv driver, > the main changes being removal of Riva128 into a separate module > and a complete rewrite of th