pearlite

2004-05-12 Thread devel@xfree86.org
It is a pearlite goods factory of Hebei province of China, the main variety that the speciality produces: Pearl mere sands, pearlite( 2. 5 mm-7mm),it regulate explosives densities because pharmaceutical( hate pearlite water), hate water keep pearlites warm board of, The cement pearlite keeps the

pearlite

2004-05-12 Thread devel@XFree86.org
It is a pearlite goods factory of Hebei province of China, the main variety that the speciality produces: Pearl mere sands, pearlite( 2. 5 mm-7mm),it regulate explosives densities because pharmaceutical( hate pearlite water), hate water keep pearlites warm board of, The cement pearlite keeps the

Re: xterm display of DEL character

2004-05-12 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Wed, 12 May 2004, D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote: > My understanding is that DEL is a control character and that it should > be (essentially) ignored when written to a screen. > > This is the case for old versions of xterm (e.g. XFree86 4.0.1(139) on > Red Hat Linux 7.0). > > This is not the case for

Re: Sis6326 register unlock problem

2004-05-12 Thread Thomas Winischhofer
harry wrote: > Thx for the info, in fact, I guessed that I used a wrong IO port > address for sis on Mips, but I don't know where can I find the > correct IO address and video memory mapping address. It's both in the PCI config registers. The X driver uses this info anyway - but the version you ar

Re: Reengineering X applications

2004-05-12 Thread Gian Filippo Pinzari
Suresh wrote: In the paper "Profiling the X Protocol" by John Daskin & Pat Hanrahan, Its is given that most X messages trains are less than 100 bytes and since the TCP/IP protocol adds 48 bytes of header information, this is a bigh overhead, (and hence he has suggested using Compressed Serial IP ov

Re: Reengineering X applications

2004-05-12 Thread Suresh
> Enter NX now. > > NX solves the latency problem. Once solved the latency > problem it treats bandwidth as part of the picture and > tries to achieve that good compression. > > http://www.nomachine.com/documentation/NX-XProtocolCompression.php > > The NX proxy system rewrites the wire X protocol t

Re: xterm display of DEL character

2004-05-12 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Wed, 12 May 2004, D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote: > My understanding is that DEL is a control character and that it should > be (essentially) ignored when written to a screen. > > This is the case for old versions of xterm (e.g. XFree86 4.0.1(139) on > Red Hat Linux 7.0). > > This is not the case for

xterm display of DEL character

2004-05-12 Thread D. Hugh Redelmeier
My understanding is that DEL is a control character and that it should be (essentially) ignored when written to a screen. This is the case for old versions of xterm (e.g. XFree86 4.0.1(139) on Red Hat Linux 7.0). This is not the case for newer versions (e.g. XFree86 4.2.0(165) on Red Hat Linux 8.