ce.
> Please, correct me if I'm wrong. But don't spend too much time on point
> '8' , I know I'm right about this one.
OK, I won't bother arguing. Saves me time anyway.
And the disk-space issue is fixed.
--
Daniel Stone
27;s really not, you know. Aside from the fact you can do permissions, there's
also the KDE module, with a flexible checkin script to allow/deny/whatever
commits, based on an arbitrary ruleset.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.deb
ICT)
placing conditions on his continued participation in a volunteer activity, not
making demands of other volunteers.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.debian.org - http://www.kde.org - http://www.freedesktop.org
"What's ne
t stands, it's an
external binary. Its main function is to show one what registers need what data
shoved into them.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.debian.org - http://www.kde.org - http://www.freedesktop.org
"Configurabi
GNOME and KDE versions will come. Don't have none, have both. Red
Hat can ship the GNOME version, SuSE/whatever can ship the KDE version, and they
work the same way, semantically. Everyone's happy.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 07:19:38AM -0400, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Daniel Stone wrote:
> >On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 02:04:00AM -0400, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> >> It's GPL licensed unfortunately. Only MIT licensed code is
> >> accepted into XFree
27;s source code. It's possible to do a clean room
> implementation, but I'm not sure if anyone would really want to
> bother when there's a working driver already.
Well, couldn't the upstream author just relicense it?
--
Daniel Stone
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 02:25:47PM -0600, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Aug 2003, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > > > This patch puts the kernel version in the banner, on Linux, and also whether
> > > > > or not it's tainted (providing it's a suffi
On Sun, Aug 10, 2003 at 09:40:43PM -0600, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
> You seem to be "submitting" a string of old patches, some of them twice.
> Why?
These patches are all from the Debian packages.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMA
On Sun, Aug 10, 2003 at 09:04:42PM -0600, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 10, 2003 at 04:57:14PM -0500, Warren Turkal wrote:
> > > This patch puts the kernel version in the banner, on Linux, and also whether
> &g
move RH_CUSTOM, etc).
Please do not accept this Linux-specific hack of a patch; I merged it to Debian,
and Mike asked me not to send it upstream.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.debian.org - http://www.kde.org - http://www.xwin.org
&quo
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 06:14:06AM -0500, Todd T. Fries wrote:
> Penned by Daniel Stone on Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 04:51:49PM +1000, we have:
> [..]
> | I did suggest this (mv hp,v hp.old,v).
>
> If you guys care about history at all, aka the ability to checkout files
> in the p
m, HP is an abbreviation for Hewlett-Packard - two proper nouns, which should
be capitalized. Dell, on the other hand, is just the last name of Michael, and
thus shouldn't be fully capitalized.
> Would it be possible to fix this issue on the repository side? I
nce in names, but feels a difference in object type
> (file vs. directory).
> Perforce on Windows has the same problems.
>
> Please manually delete `hp' file, and try `cvs update' again.
Moving hp,v to hp.old,v on the server would also help a lot. Another sterling
example
On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 05:12:00AM -0400, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Jul 2003, Daniel Stone wrote:
> >Not very many, and their competitirs would then have access to all their IP, so
> >could out-do them in the next generation of cards.
>
> I doubt that it would involv
> microcode engine from one of these drivers however is even much
> more likely than reverse engineering the KFC recipe by analyzing
> the molecular structure of the crispy crust.
Aye. The problem with this view is that most people slam you for trying to kill
open source or some cr
ss to all their IP, so
could out-do them in the next generation of cards.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.kde.org - http://www.debian.org - http://www.xwin.org
"Configurability is always the best choice when it's p
sion
> of X than my own, what can I do? Should I try it with a 4.3 server?
> (and if so, are some official debs available?) Could you compile it
> against a lower version for me? Or shall I just give up on this whilst
> somebody else with more xfree86 smarts tests it? :(
4.3.0 debs
to support the relocation types introduced in gcc3.2, as we
recently had to do for other, non-i386/powerpc architectures.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Trinity College, University of Melbourne
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
x27; instruction which adds
> some other files to the final map).
So what's the best way to get an Apple Pro keyboard working fully?
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Trinity College, University of Melbourne
msg00251/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
this in his latest package set, IIRC.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Trinity College, University of Melbourne
msg00152/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 12:06:42AM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III scrawled:
> >>>>> "DS" == Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> DS> Probably, but in the 40 Dell Optiplex SX260s I just helped deploy
> DS> as a lab one and a half hours ag
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 11:54:04PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III scrawled:
> >>>>> "DS" == Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> DS> There's also a BIOS option to do this early ...
>
> Many of the BIOS versions out there are bugg
es shared memory, whereas the
> >Savage/MX has its own separate VRAM. The driver doesn't care at all.
>
> I guess the Intel integrated graphics chips (810/815, 830M, 845G) are
> a little different then, with the agpgart kernel driver allowing additional
> system me
x27;s irrelevant now, isn't it? One of the big complaints
> has been that XFree86 has had the appearance of an exclusive club.
> Well, that has been addressed by effectively eliminating the club!
> Isn't that what the "Open Source Community" wanted?
patches@, fixes@,
e general public?
Yes, but with Bugzilla you can have open submissions, but only certain
users able to set bugs to CONFIRMED, etc. Maybe if we handed the latter
out to only clueful people ...
:) d, KDE developer and current Debian XFree86 4.3 dude, so excuse the
bias
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Trinity College, University of Melbourne
msg00073/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
26 matches
Mail list logo
